| Who's
`out of the loop'? In Bush White House, leadership
style works against communication
by Dr. Charles M. Kelly
OpEdNews.Com
In her April 8 testimony, Condoleezza Rice repeatedly blamed structural
problems as the likely causes of our failure to connect-the-dots of
intelligence that might have prevented 9-11.
My experience with corporations suggests that problems of upward and
cross-unit communications usually are more a matter of leadership
philosophy and style than of the bureaucracy. Still, top managements
almost always blame the bureaucracy and the performance of lower-level
executives when serious communication failures hurt the organization.
For example, an organization having serious communication problems may
try to solve them by decentralizing. If done well, the decentralization
will usually improve conditions -- for six months, or maybe a year. Then,
the original problems surface again and the organization is back where it
started. Then it re-centralizes, and conditions again get better, for a
while.
The communication problems were never a matter of structure; they were
a result of leadership style. Each reorganization simply rearranged
relationships and everyone was aware of management's new, but temporary,
focus on the process. And the improvements lasted just long enough for the
old leadership style to reassert its influence.
Compare the leadership styles of the Clinton and Bush administrations.
Any mistakes the Clinton administration may have made in fighting
terrorism were likely due to judgments resulting from the faulty analysis
of extensive data. Clinton's passion for ideas and information from all
sources is legendary. As the record indicates, he sought inputs from all
sources -- from all levels and functions of government, and even from
those who disagreed with him.
On the other hand, growing evidence (e.g., books by Richard Clarke,
John Dean, Paul O'Neill) suggests that the Bush administration came into
office with a predetermined agenda, and chose to pursue that agenda almost
to the exclusion of competing ideas. They went through the motions of a
comprehensive approach to dealing with terrorism, but their leadership
style didn't fit their rhetoric, or even their published documents.
A corporation's "statement of mission" or "corporate
philosophy" always sounds like it came out of a management textbook.
Problem is: Published documents, and even public statements of top
executives, are almost irrelevant compared to leadership philosophy and
style -- as evidenced by their actual behaviors.
In much the same way, a government administration will make sure that
it officially presents a textbook description of how it is covering all
the issues that are expected in governing. And, of course, the Bush
administration had a comprehensive plan for dealing with terrorism. But
its actions demonstrated to other levels and functions of government what
their real priorities were, and who was to determine how they would be
implemented.
Dick Cheney's comment that Richard Clarke was "not in the
loop" is suggestive of the insular nature of his openness to upward
communication. And when Rice said that none of Clarke's recommendations
would have prevented 9-11, she was referring to his specific proposals to
deal with terrorism. She failed to acknowledge Clarke's constant requests
for higher-level meetings, which could have demonstrated top-level
commitment to improving upward- and cross-communications.
When you have an ideologically driven administration with predetermined
priorities, you automatically have top-down and fractured communication --
and a terrible problem-solving environment.
Chuck Kelly kellycm@comporium.net
is at http://www.KellySite.net. He
holds a Ph.D. in industrial communications from Purdue University, is now
a retired management consultant, and author of the books, THE DESTRUCTIVE
ACHEIVER, THE GREAT LIMBAUGH CON, and CLASS WAR IN AMERICA. This article
is originally published at opednews.com.
Copyright Chuck Kelly, but permission is granted for reprint in print,
email, blog, or web media so long as this credit is attached
|