Like
a Man Cheating on His Wife,
by
Lonna Gooden VanHorn, August 21, 2004
The Republican
funding of the attack on Kerry’s Military Record and their attempt
to discredit the valor which earned him a bronze star, a silver star
and 3 purple hearts is exactly
the same thing as a man cheating on his wife who then comes
home and accuses her of being unfaithful. She
is the wronged one, but she is the one who ends up defending herself,
thereby deflecting attention from his misdeeds. Which is his intent.
The Bush Attack Machine has used this same method when any unfavorable
information has come out about Bush or his policies. They have
attacked the messenger because they do not want the people to hear the
message. They did it to Paul O’Neal, Richard Clarke, Joe Wilson,
Bill Burkett, et. al.
Detractors
attack Kerry because his wounds were not serious. They would attack
him if he were missing limbs, just as they attacked Max Cleland.
Kerry
did not believe in the war, but enlisted in the navy and requested duty in
Vietnam
. Bush/Cheney et al believed in the Vietnam War, but worked
assiduously using every connection available to them to avoid going there.
George Bush himself said,
"
I was not prepared to shoot my eardrum out with a shotgun in order to get
a deferment. Nor was I willing to go to
Canada
. So I chose to better myself by learning how to fly airplanes."
Bush jumped over
several hundred candidates who also
did not want to go to
Vietnam
to get in the TANG, but their
fathers were not rich or important. Bush’s own
Secretary of State had something to say about that:
"I
am angry that so many of the sons of the powerful and well-placed...
managed to wangle slots in Reserve and National Guard units...Of
the many tragedies of Vietnam, this raw class discrimination strikes me as
the most damaging to the ideal that all Americans are created equal and
owe equal allegiance to their country." (Colin
Powell’s autobiography, My American Journey, p. 148)
It cost taxpayers hundreds
of thousands of dollars for Bush to learn to fly. He was
indisputably grounded from flying, at least AWOL, and probably technically
a deserter:
AWOL----absent
for 30 days or less.
DESERTION
-----absent for more than 30 days
with evidence of no intent to return to duty.
In
every military evaluation he received, Kerry was rated as an outstanding
and exemplary officer. The men who actually served under him swear
by him. Bush went AWOL stateside, but Kerry is attacked because he
served only four months in
Vietnam
.
Kerry’s
disillusionment with war only increased after he experienced war first
hand, and like hundreds of thousands of other veterans including ret. Col.
David Hackworth, when Kerry came home he took a stand against the war
-- a stand which probably cost him his bid for Congress.
Charles
Colson actively recruited veterans to attack Kerry in ’71 because he was
afraid that Kerry and other Veterans for Peace were a threat to Nixon’s
reelection campaign. Colson said Kerry was
·
“ a thorn in our flesh. He was very articulate, a credible leader of the
opposition. He forced us to create a counterfoil. We found a vet named
John O’Neill and formed a group called Vietnam Veterans for a Just
Peace. We had O’Neill meet the president, and we did everything we could
do to boost his group.”
Col.
Hackworth and many other veterans have written blistering articles against
the SBVT attacks.
All
that aside, neither man should be elected or not elected on the basis of
his service record alone, but we do need as president a man who is
intelligent, capable, and honest enough to not:
1.
Squander a surplus and take us into unending debt to benefit his rich
friends and campaign contributors, allowing them to trash the environment
in the process.
2.
Lie us into a war which has become a quagmire and which will result
in the deaths and maiming of thousands of American soldiers at the cost
of, perhaps, a trillion dollars of taxpayer money, most of which will end
up in the pockets of military-industrial contractors who are campaign
contributors to Bush/Cheney.
3.
Implicitly condone policies so egregious and culturally insensitive that
they cause the people in a country our troops occupy to prefer their
former murderous dictator to the presence of American troops, as every
poll taken in Iraq proves Bush has done. These self-defeating
policies prompted an Iraqi woman who writes a blog from
Iraq
to say months ago that she wished the Americans would just take the oil
and go. On May 7th of this year she wrote a paragraph of
advice to Americans in
Iraq
:
·
“ don't rape, don't
torture, don't kill, and get out while you can -- while it still looks
like you have a choice. . . . Chaos? Civil war? We'll take our chances --
just take your puppets, your tanks, your smart weapons, your dumb
politicians, your lies, your empty promises, your rapists, your sadistic
torturers and go."
4.
We need a president who if he proposes programs will also fund them.
5.
We
need a president who listens to the scientific and environmental
communities rather than editing their reports to make the results of his
policies look better.
6.
We do
not need
as president a man whose arrogance and belligerence has made America and
Americans universally hated around the world, with the result that America
now has hundreds of millions if not billions more enemies. The man
and the policies responsible for that increased hatred has made us less
safe, not more safe, and rather than influencing them to help us find
people who would commit terrorism against us, he has made many of the
people who formerly liked Americans actually cheer when Americans are
attacked!
Above
all, because Americans are less than 5% of the world’s population we
need a president who does not have a closed mind. A man who is
intellectually curious and can reason. Bush admits he does not read.
Policy briefings bore him. He has proven to the rest of the world he
does not have the wisdom to be the leader of the free world, even though
many Americans are in denial regarding the woeful inadequacies of the man
the majority of them did not vote for in 2000.
We
need a man who will engage in diplomacy with other nations -- one they
will respect and trust enough to negotiate with. We need a man who
can restore
America
to its’ position as the admired leader of the free world once again.
That will not happen as long as bully Bush is president.
As
Molly Ivins writes from
Canada
(but she would be writing the same message from virtually any other
country in the world)
·
“I have been at some pains to
try to answer the ever-so-delicately phrased questions: Are you people
actually going to re-elect that nincompoop?”
Lonna
Gooden VanHorn A
mother of 6 and a grandmother, Lonna Gooden VanHorn grew up in
Minnesota, the daughter of small farmers. She became so frustrated with
the media's failure to do its' job which is to question and hold
accountable those who occupy the seats of power, especially involving
something as important and costly in lives and taxpayer dollars as going
to war, that she began writing to ease her frustration. Lonna
is married to a Vietnam veteran and now lives in New Mexico. My
e-mail address is jvanhorn@peoplepc.com
|