Become a Fan. You'll get emails whenever I post articles on OpEdNews
Assisting in the research of 9/11 since 2006. Only physical evidence observable through pictures or measurement data should be considered to determine what happened at all three sites. Hearsay and unsupported hypotheses must be dismissed and considered intentionally proffered to distract.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 Two 9/11-related Qui Tam Cases Filed in U.S. District Court, SDNY (32 comments)
A nearly complete set of briefs and affidavits have been filed in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, by the attorney for Dr. Judy Wood in the case entitled Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al. 1:07cv3314 (Hon. George B. Daniels, Judge). Similar affidavits were filed by Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel USA vs. SAIC et al 1:07cv4612 one month previously, also pending with J. Daniels.
