 |
|
|
I have a special interest in discussing 9/11 conspiracy theories, and am still looking for one that makes the slightest bit of sense after objectively reading and evaluating them for several years now. I am familiar with most of the conspiracy web sites and what they have to say, as well as with NIST's NCSTAR1, FEMA's WTC Building Performance Study, and a number of 9/11 debunking web sites also. The latter tend to be far more logical than the conspiracy sites, and not only express opinions, but back them up with credible sources. The conspiracy theorists frequently make claims with no corroborating evidence at all. OpEdNews Member for 129 week(s) and 4 day(s) 1 Articles, 0 Quick Links, 372 Comments, 0 Diaries, 0 Polls |
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |
372 comments
Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 10:26:12 AM
Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
There have been
Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 10:12:43 AM
Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
The obvious difference here
Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 9:45:12 AM
Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
"Only a manager"
Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 9:08:53 AM
Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
I've noticed
Saturday, December 13, 2008 at 5:11:09 PM
Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"
In this case,
Thursday, September 11, 2008 at 9:57:09 AM
Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"
Sorry about your distress
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 7:42:23 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Way too many assumptions
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 7:09:41 PM
Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"
That's easy
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 5:50:48 PM
Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"
Not much
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 5:31:14 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Smokescreen?
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 5:12:50 PM
Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"
Did you notice this?
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 2:14:38 PM
Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"
No, there weren't
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 1:58:02 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
You apparently don't think
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 1:54:26 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
How gullible can you get?
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 1:37:44 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
More sophistry from the "truth" movement
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 10:58:05 AM
Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"
It was neither classic nor controlled
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 8:40:38 AM
Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"
Classic case
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 8:05:17 AM
Article: "Seven Years Later, Burning Questions Still Smolder"
Burning question that's still smoldering
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 7:37:20 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
REAL investigation
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 at 7:09:32 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Who's jumping to conclusions?
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 9:04:06 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Would it have made more sense
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 8:37:46 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Your blatant hypocrisy and obfuscation
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 8:17:48 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
There's hope
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 7:50:23 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
The witness
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 7:36:32 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Your evidence is nonexistent
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 6:37:33 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Reading comprehension assistance
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 1:21:32 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
re: correction...
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 12:50:31 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
I haven't been proven wrong once
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 12:31:32 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Special plane?
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 12:25:32 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Loose Change Forum and "no-plane" nuts
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 11:56:49 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
re: Maybe...
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 11:51:43 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Explanation
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 11:42:59 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Newest theory for the "truth" movement
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 10:21:34 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Then argue with these people, Jack
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 10:15:43 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
B-25 Mitchells
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 9:48:06 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
You do it, then
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 9:36:29 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
If they were there
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 8:50:23 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Thanks, but I know what I said
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 8:30:53 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Note to the editor
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 8:20:51 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Quite a conspiracy
Tuesday, September 9, 2008 at 7:53:09 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Neither
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 9:56:10 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
BFD
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 9:33:27 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
That's fortunate
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 9:28:20 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Dunces
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 9:23:32 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Your blurry pictures and goofy no-plane "theory"
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 9:17:34 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
One question, Dave
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 7:31:45 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Good Lord
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 7:28:08 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Faux News
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 7:23:02 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Nose cone?
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 7:18:56 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Magnitude?
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 7:14:34 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Shallow?
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 6:16:32 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Yes, that is amazing
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 6:02:04 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
It wouldn't be the first time
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 5:51:36 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Why ask me?
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 5:47:00 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Nice straw man
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 5:22:25 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Who's the chickensh*t who flagged this comment?
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 3:42:56 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
NORAD question
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 2:53:13 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Let's try this one more time...
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 12:20:02 PM
Article: "Seven Years Later, Burning Questions Still Smolder"
Pyroclastic flows
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 12:11:08 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
NTSB
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 10:55:21 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
re: It's real simple...
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 10:11:01 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Despicable cowards
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 10:04:28 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
You two are a hoot
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 9:31:43 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Global Hawks
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 8:23:50 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
You didn't cover this one
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 8:13:20 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Once again, for the slow learners
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 8:03:53 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Great news for United Airlines
Monday, September 8, 2008 at 7:19:36 AM
Article: "Seven Years Later, Burning Questions Still Smolder"
Some suggestions for you, Sherry
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 10:34:45 PM
Article: "Seven Years Later, Burning Questions Still Smolder"
Defend yours, Sherry
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 9:39:45 PM
Article: "Seven Years Later, Burning Questions Still Smolder"
Help them out
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 9:34:01 PM
Article: "Seven Years Later, Burning Questions Still Smolder"
Send in the clowns
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 9:07:56 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
That's some conspiracy, doofus
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 8:09:32 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Shhhhhh....
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 12:10:45 PM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
This has already been explained
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 11:43:10 AM
Article: "Seven Years Later, Burning Questions Still Smolder"
Open debate
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 11:23:09 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Give ME a break
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 11:20:12 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
That's called begging the question (or just plain lying)
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 9:33:05 AM
Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"
Just a hunch
Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 8:41:40 AM
Article: "Seven Years Later, Burning Questions Still Smolder"
I'm just sick and tired of fools too, Sherry
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 9:53:46 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
I'm starting to worry about you too
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 9:48:38 PM
Diary: "WTC 7 Collapsed at the Same Speed as Known Controlled Demoli"
You're preaching to the choir
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 6:39:58 PM
Diary: "WTC 7 Collapsed at the Same Speed as Known Controlled Demoli"
Too funny
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 2:41:13 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Black smoke = cool fire?
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 12:02:16 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Once again, doofus
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 10:49:27 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
I know what I said
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 9:31:46 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
More lying from Bob Smith
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 9:00:58 AM
Diary: "WTC 7 Collapsed at the Same Speed as Known Controlled Demoli"
George
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 6:56:03 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Don't be bashful, Bob
Saturday, September 6, 2008 at 6:43:34 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Computer simulation of the impact of UA 175
Friday, September 5, 2008 at 9:46:23 PM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
Captain Burlingame
Friday, September 5, 2008 at 9:32:54 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
The big dope
Friday, September 5, 2008 at 9:18:06 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
What a relief
Friday, September 5, 2008 at 8:12:02 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Hani Hanjour and the other heroes of the "truth" movement
Friday, September 5, 2008 at 7:57:04 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Yep
Friday, September 5, 2008 at 7:46:19 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
They couldn't fly?
Friday, September 5, 2008 at 4:48:35 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
I'm enjoying
Thursday, September 4, 2008 at 6:26:08 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Read NCSTAR1
Thursday, September 4, 2008 at 5:06:26 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Which will collapse first?
Wednesday, September 3, 2008 at 3:47:35 PM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
Nice copout
Wednesday, September 3, 2008 at 3:26:19 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Read it, dufus:
Wednesday, September 3, 2008 at 3:22:49 PM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
re: "I just asked if you were a shill (not a statement)"
Wednesday, September 3, 2008 at 3:14:46 PM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
To answer your question,
Wednesday, September 3, 2008 at 3:03:31 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Your photo
Wednesday, September 3, 2008 at 1:26:26 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
It's disgust, not desperation
Wednesday, September 3, 2008 at 12:36:35 PM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
I'm "interested in debating,"
Wednesday, September 3, 2008 at 10:42:41 AM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
Uh, no, it's not
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 at 7:40:40 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
You're "QUITE CERTAIN"
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 at 7:30:31 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Importance
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 at 7:24:47 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
re: "Wow...."
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 at 7:11:39 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Why do you keep lying?
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 at 6:32:08 PM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
You hit a new low with this one
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 at 6:16:11 PM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
No
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 at 5:27:49 PM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
Paid government shill?
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 at 2:13:24 PM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
More conspirators?
Monday, September 1, 2008 at 11:06:58 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Nice spin
Monday, September 1, 2008 at 10:57:21 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
I've never seen one
Monday, September 1, 2008 at 10:54:19 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Coincidences and mathematical improbabilites
Monday, September 1, 2008 at 10:50:57 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
re: "What???"
Monday, September 1, 2008 at 10:07:05 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Nonsense, there was no "Evidence of Thermal Cutting Charges"
Monday, September 1, 2008 at 8:55:24 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Simple question
Sunday, August 31, 2008 at 4:30:10 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Circular saw theory?
Sunday, August 31, 2008 at 3:23:10 PM
Article: "Paging Terry Gilliam, or Why Mother Jones Can't Have It Both"
You can't have it both ways, either
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 8:36:07 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Gage needs you, Dave
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 8:30:59 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Another 9/11 "researcher"
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 8:24:30 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
LOL
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 8:13:58 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
It was severed steel, you IDIOT
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 8:02:42 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Here's yours:
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 7:57:27 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Good Lord...
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 7:43:07 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
re: "But Albury......."
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 7:33:25 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
re:
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 7:16:17 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Extremely silly
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 7:09:57 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
How silly can you get?
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 6:47:21 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Here's another
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 6:38:37 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Try again, dimwit
Friday, August 29, 2008 at 6:14:53 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
re:
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 8:53:18 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Here's
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 7:52:20 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
How about
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 7:50:42 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Nice Alex Jones quote mining job
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 7:36:50 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
They were also explained by the LDEO scientists,
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 7:32:03 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Don't take my word for it
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 7:18:33 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Here's a better one
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 7:11:25 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
You're easily amused
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 11:05:43 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Fireproofing
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 11:01:29 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
More messages
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 10:31:43 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Building codes
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 10:25:34 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
My "drivel"
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 8:39:56 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
How telling
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 8:07:57 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Funny you should mention issues, Dave
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 7:45:31 AM
Article: "A New Single Theory is Just the Same old Story"
Here are some more tips
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 6:44:40 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
re: Feet
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 6:30:01 AM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
re: "???"
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 6:19:44 AM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
Another point of logic adduced
Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 6:06:38 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
re: "F@ck off !!"
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 7:41:42 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
So what?
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 7:32:45 PM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
Stupid?
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 7:06:48 PM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
Objective physical evidence
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 6:46:54 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Do you have an argument
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 6:39:26 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
The government?
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 6:32:18 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
No, he's probably telling the truth
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 6:24:33 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Remarkable
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 6:20:53 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Smear?
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 5:48:27 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Why?
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 5:39:29 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Nothing circular about it
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 5:22:53 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
re: "Everyone..."
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 2:40:11 PM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
What "compelling evidence"?
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 2:33:42 PM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
The dumb one on the bus
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 1:41:54 PM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
Huh?
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 1:06:14 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Wrong
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 12:59:23 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
It proves that it was hot in the debris piles
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 12:36:59 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Greening and NIST
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 12:20:15 PM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
re: "So....."
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 11:52:59 AM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
100%
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 10:47:45 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Do yourself a favor, Tim
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 9:40:43 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Right about what?
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 9:06:59 AM
Diary: "Their Words On Paper"
Another thought
Tuesday, August 26, 2008 at 9:12:52 PM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
Just a simple request
Tuesday, August 26, 2008 at 8:27:09 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Molten steel is the straw man
Monday, August 25, 2008 at 7:54:24 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
re: "Share that"
Monday, August 25, 2008 at 7:44:52 AM
Article: "NIST Releases Long-Awaited Report on WTC7"
First time?
Monday, August 25, 2008 at 6:38:58 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
re: "smith at a loss"
Monday, August 25, 2008 at 6:11:39 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
LOL. Priceless
Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 7:38:31 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Obfuscate much?
Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 7:05:48 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Glad to hear it
Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 3:40:34 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
You're off topic
Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 3:15:02 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
For the record
Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 2:31:14 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
You could learn something if you didn't "know" so much
Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 1:02:57 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Would you even recognize a fact if you saw one?
Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 9:37:47 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Who's misleading whom, Richard?
Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 8:55:29 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
What "laughs," Kenny?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 7:21:27 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Serious subject
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 7:03:29 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
re: "you said it"
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 5:55:57 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Good bye to you, too
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 5:25:27 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
What "mistake"?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 4:27:42 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
They weren't even beams in the towers
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 1:17:10 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Amazing!
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 1:14:12 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
So this proves the towers were bombed by Silverstein?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 1:08:04 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Loud noise or multiple cutter charges right before collapse?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 11:58:53 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Who said it didn't?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 11:30:03 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
re: "Safety first"
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 10:38:29 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
re: Vulcanomics
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 10:27:56 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
You're grasping at straws
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 10:13:55 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Junk science from KU's Dept. of Physics
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 10:08:30 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Think so?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 9:46:52 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Duh!
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 9:40:14 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Don't be modest, Kenny
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 9:34:52 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Who's redirecting?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 9:29:03 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
You're now resorting to blatant dishonesty
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 9:18:59 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
You're the one claiming to know more than NIST does
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 9:01:40 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Where's the beef?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 8:50:02 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
So?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 8:38:14 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
You misread my comments
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 8:20:31 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
"ONLY evidence"?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 8:09:33 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Very unbelievable...
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 7:54:49 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
re: "Entropy"
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 7:48:59 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
He is?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 7:43:36 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
A "very real possibility"?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 7:26:34 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
So what?
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 7:14:03 AM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Gee, it sure was...
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 7:03:43 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Watch and learn
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 6:54:59 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Your "patriots"
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 6:26:35 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Suggestion
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 6:17:44 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
More BS and libel from the 9/11 "truth" movement
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 5:49:54 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
That's easy
Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 5:30:15 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Read much?
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 8:44:48 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
You aren't?
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 8:19:24 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
re: "Mr. Smith?"
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 7:21:24 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Special thermate?
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 7:17:25 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Sheeple
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 7:13:14 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Underground fires, a dumber than usual argument
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 6:55:04 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
How about your own?
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 6:33:05 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
You're partially correct
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 5:58:16 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Truther 101
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 5:55:18 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Rumor mongering, libel, and pure ignorance
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 5:39:11 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
re: Silverstein's Quote
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 5:16:08 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Thermate and thermite
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 5:00:55 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
More real persons
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 4:40:40 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Easy to make, hard to use
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 1:40:03 PM
Diary: "NIST Discovers Fire"
Hogwash
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 1:22:05 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Unbelievable
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 12:20:48 PM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
re: A few questions
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 11:12:20 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
So Larry was in on that too?
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 10:51:22 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
No, just another variation on the same theme
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 9:54:12 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Really lame
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 9:40:40 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Let's talk about yours
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 9:22:20 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Not strange at all
Friday, August 22, 2008 at 8:48:23 AM
Diary: "Silverstein praises the NIST WTC7 government work"
Wow, that's really some conspiracy!
Thursday, August 21, 2008 at 8:08:45 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Coincidence?
Wednesday, August 20, 2008 at 5:53:38 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Jodie, John, and Kevin
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 7:32:19 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Too complicated for you, apparently
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 7:22:32 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Good analogy
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 7:15:42 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Explosions or explosives?
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 6:47:56 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
"Your" grasping at straws
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 5:43:38 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
True, mentioning Marvin Bush and Wirt Walker makes no sense
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 5:09:46 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Basement explosions
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 4:31:03 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Not I
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 7:45:41 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
"Blown out"?
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 7:40:30 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
So what?
Monday, August 18, 2008 at 7:03:41 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Which one?
Monday, August 18, 2008 at 5:44:16 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Nonsense
Monday, August 18, 2008 at 5:04:43 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
What caused this alleged anomaly?
Monday, August 18, 2008 at 8:17:53 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
A big shill list just for you
Monday, August 18, 2008 at 6:47:01 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Hurry, Dave
Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 12:26:40 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Don't pass this one up, Dave
Saturday, August 16, 2008 at 6:10:32 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Easily explained
Saturday, August 16, 2008 at 6:08:02 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Easily resolved
Saturday, August 16, 2008 at 6:01:50 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
What's the matter?
Saturday, August 16, 2008 at 5:59:02 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
It's obvious that you can't
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 6:25:40 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
The ball's in your court
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 5:47:45 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
New kind of C/D?
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 1:47:52 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
What discrepancy?
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 1:26:51 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Pretense?
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 12:24:53 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
You're overlooking something
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 11:38:30 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Collapse time
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 10:57:24 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Garbage in, garbage out
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 10:33:40 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Shill?
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 10:27:20 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
A lot better than yours
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 9:52:18 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
You're a one-trick pony
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 9:45:49 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Answer the question
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 9:39:42 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
What a jerk
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 9:33:01 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
16 seconds per floor?
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 8:46:04 AM
Article: "An Invitation for Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton to Participate i"
You would't accept the findings of any real investigation
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 8:07:49 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
What's to know?
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 7:50:31 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Do you ever actually think?
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 7:31:49 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Thanks for that enlightenment
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 7:27:03 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
How would you know?
Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 8:18:40 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Yes, how pathetic
Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 7:22:08 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Shillin?
Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 2:04:53 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Short attention span?
Wednesday, August 13, 2008 at 8:16:28 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
More "truther" sophistry
Wednesday, August 13, 2008 at 6:39:07 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
huh?
Wednesday, August 13, 2008 at 6:15:17 AM
Article: "An Invitation for Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton to Participate i"
Start with the investigations we've already had
Tuesday, August 12, 2008 at 8:19:28 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Absurd?
Tuesday, August 12, 2008 at 5:41:39 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
The "conspirators"
Tuesday, August 12, 2008 at 4:54:14 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Not exactly
Tuesday, August 12, 2008 at 1:59:42 PM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Common sense?
Tuesday, August 12, 2008 at 6:29:15 AM
Diary: "9/11 Truth, Part 1 of 11- 9/11 & Public Opinion"
Human Being and concerned Citizen?
Sunday, August 10, 2008 at 11:42:40 AM
Article: "Anthrax Redux"
Baloney
Sunday, August 3, 2008 at 7:08:48 PM
Article: "Anthrax Redux"
Right wing, or just facts?
Sunday, August 3, 2008 at 10:21:56 AM
Article: "Anthrax Redux"
You're welcome
Sunday, August 3, 2008 at 7:57:08 AM
Article: "Anthrax Redux"
Gravity defying collapses?
Thursday, July 31, 2008 at 8:03:21 PM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Watch and learn
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 6:59:07 PM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
You forgot a few things
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 4:13:39 PM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
What do you know?
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 3:20:17 PM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Basic and simple
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 3:16:25 PM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Dr. Steven Jones
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 2:48:04 PM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
I agree
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 11:49:19 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Cherry picking info?
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 11:38:56 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
If?
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 11:23:00 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Find another hobby, goofball
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 11:14:41 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
More quote mining?
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 10:59:58 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Straw Man Argument
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 10:42:40 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Those lucky "conspirators"
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 10:32:34 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Thanks for making my point
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 10:05:31 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
More "conspirators"?
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 9:48:32 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
"Minor" details that you can't explain
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 9:41:48 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Wrong again
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 9:35:28 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Ad hominem
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 9:31:15 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Obsession
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 9:28:01 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
NIST isn't investigating the collapse of WTC 7?
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 9:21:48 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Are you?
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 9:10:05 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Spare me the mock outrage
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 9:00:19 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
If you don't, you're not looking
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 8:40:57 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Nice spin
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 8:16:01 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
Making up your own facts?
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 7:13:58 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
The FDNY did it?
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 7:08:51 AM
Article: "WTC 7: A New Kind of Controlled Demolition"
One cause can easily be ruled out
Tuesday, July 29, 2008 at 8:13:02 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
You're not quite there yet, Juan
Tuesday, July 29, 2008 at 7:57:35 AM
Quicklink: "9/11 and the Pentagon Attack: What Eyewitnesses Described"
Post your proof
Sunday, July 27, 2008 at 4:09:48 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
What part of it?
Sunday, July 27, 2008 at 8:26:55 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Yes, the official theory is correct
Sunday, July 27, 2008 at 6:21:59 AM
Quicklink: "9/11 and the Pentagon Attack: What Eyewitnesses Described"
You're worse than that
Saturday, July 26, 2008 at 9:31:34 PM
Quicklink: "9/11 and the Pentagon Attack: What Eyewitnesses Described"
Go for it
Saturday, July 26, 2008 at 4:05:06 PM
Quicklink: "9/11 and the Pentagon Attack: What Eyewitnesses Described"
No, you're not
Saturday, July 26, 2008 at 3:53:56 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Thorough Investigation?
Saturday, July 26, 2008 at 2:59:28 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Honesty and Decency?
Saturday, July 26, 2008 at 1:04:22 PM
Quicklink: "9/11 and the Pentagon Attack: What Eyewitnesses Described"
Probably?
Friday, July 25, 2008 at 6:42:13 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Your "research"
Friday, July 25, 2008 at 2:49:13 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Trolling?
Friday, July 25, 2008 at 10:29:21 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Who and how much pays me
Friday, July 25, 2008 at 8:01:36 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Be Prepared
Friday, July 25, 2008 at 7:52:40 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
A new theory
Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 8:18:15 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Since you don't read...
Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 4:17:11 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
I'm just trying to help you truthers spread the word
Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 4:13:39 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
There's just no fooling you, is there?
Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 10:38:57 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Suggestions for the 9/11 Truth Movement
Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 8:40:43 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Well what?
Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 7:27:42 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Some help for the factually challenged...
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 8:48:30 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
re: Truthers
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 7:31:27 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
You're Puzzled?
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 7:14:32 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
A "simple matter of fact"?
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 5:01:28 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
A "mercenary troll" responds
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 4:45:44 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Some context for Harry and the other high beams
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 1:16:30 PM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
"Thorough forensic investigation" just to see signs of C/D?
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 11:06:37 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
What "dead links"?
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 10:59:04 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Only if you're really obtuse
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 6:32:33 AM
Diary: "What comes after 9/11?"
Well Indeed
Monday, July 14, 2008 at 1:15:30 PM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
World Trade Center AND Building 7?
Monday, July 14, 2008 at 12:17:03 PM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
No longer "anonymous," I hope
Monday, July 14, 2008 at 11:53:24 AM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
Risk?
Monday, July 14, 2008 at 11:42:44 AM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
What "risk"?
Monday, July 14, 2008 at 11:36:06 AM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
Do you even have a point?
Monday, July 14, 2008 at 11:25:13 AM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
re: "Debunkers"
Monday, July 14, 2008 at 10:53:52 AM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
OK, I Tried It
Sunday, July 13, 2008 at 10:33:13 AM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
Moral Cowardice
Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 2:59:52 PM
Article: "BBC's Third Tower: 30 Pieces of Good News"
Not trying to be anonymous
Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 2:50:16 PM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
Still anonymous
Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 2:35:54 PM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
From "anonymous"
Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 9:27:53 AM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
Richard Gage vs The Truth
Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 8:01:23 AM
Article: "BBC's Third Tower: 30 Pieces of Good News"
More Good News for the Truth Movement
Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 7:34:46 AM
Article: "Why Are "Progressive" Media Burying 9/11?"
Indisputable Evidence?
Wednesday, July 9, 2008 at 2:47:16 PM
Article: "Suggestions for the 9/11 Truth Movement"
By The Numbers
Monday, June 4, 2007 at 6:49:33 AM
Article: "Cadet Repudiates Cheney at West Point Ceremony"
Cadet/Cheney Story