Founder and President of US Count Votes, dba The National Election Data Archive and volunteer for honest, accurately counted elections since 2003. Masters degree in mathematics with emphasis on computer science. Has written numerous academic and scientific papers with computer scientists, statisticians, and mathematicians on election integrity topics, inluding how to calculate minimum manual audit amounts necessary to ensure election outcome integrity.
48 comments
Saturday, April 21, 2007 at 5:17:35 PM
Article: "Two Compelling Reasons To Resist the Holt Bill"
Andi - HR811 ends trade secret software
Sunday, April 8, 2007 at 1:01:34 PM
Article: "Election Reform Groups Formally Oppose Public Disclosure of"
Bev - Tell me ONE thing that is not true & I'll Retract it
Saturday, April 7, 2007 at 4:23:26 PM
Article: "Election activist aims to test Sequoia machines in Nevada"
Great Patricia - John Gideon & I Investigated NV's "Audits"
Saturday, March 31, 2007 at 1:40:35 PM
Article: "Urgent call to FAX Congressional Reps and House Admin Ctte o"
Colleen - I'll answer your Question Directly re. Holt
Friday, February 23, 2007 at 4:46:17 PM
Quicklink: "Turning the Vote Theft Issue on its Head"
"Voter" fraud and "Vote" fraud are two different things.
Thursday, February 22, 2007 at 4:58:37 PM
Article: "Holt's HR 811, A Deceptive Boondoggle -- 10 Blunders to Fix"
Good Post - one small error
Tuesday, February 20, 2007 at 9:23:36 PM
Article: "The Worst 10 Senators up for Reelection"
Great Job - Thanks for doing this
Sunday, February 18, 2007 at 11:19:11 PM
Article: "Response to Avi Rubin's Support for Holt HR 811"
You have some good points here Bev
Monday, February 5, 2007 at 4:25:49 PM
Quicklink: "If you thought election law battles were over, think again"
It is not practical to verify voting machine software
Monday, February 5, 2007 at 4:23:36 PM
Quicklink: "If you thought election law battles were over, think again"
legal args to obtain election records - records requests
Saturday, January 27, 2007 at 12:52:56 AM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Lay Person"
Your comments are factually inaccurate, illogical, etc.
Friday, January 26, 2007 at 1:44:31 AM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Lay Person"
Good Question - Several Reasons
Thursday, January 25, 2007 at 12:05:48 PM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Lay Person"
I agree 100% with Adams, why don't you?
Thursday, January 25, 2007 at 12:03:27 PM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Lay Person"
Again your 100% mischaracterizations show you lack honesty
Thursday, January 25, 2007 at 2:15:00 AM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Lay Person"
Wow. Reposted Paul Lehto's Entire Article Here!
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 8:42:36 PM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Layman"
You are mischaracterizing Why don't you want fair elections?
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 6:43:03 PM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Layman"
Thanks for the correction
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 5:05:34 PM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Layman"
You are Provably Incorrect & are Mischaracterizing
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 3:26:33 PM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Layman"
Why do you not want fair elections in 2008?
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 2:31:14 PM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Layman"
I understand that you do not want fair elections in 2008
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 1:26:37 PM
Article: "Insider trading stock sell-off by Ciber execs during EAC sec"
Nicely written article -
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 1:03:44 PM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Layman"
No I am saying that that is NOT an option now in the US
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 11:30:39 AM
Article: ""Tiered Election Audits" for the Layman"
That is not one of the choices Mark
Tuesday, January 16, 2007 at 10:48:41 PM
Article: "It Is Not Whether Or Not To Audit Elections, But HOW!"
Yes I support "real" audits - as written in article above
Tuesday, January 16, 2007 at 6:15:00 PM
Article: "It Is Not Whether Or Not To Audit Elections, But HOW!"
Vote Counts should be audited even if initially hand-counted
Tuesday, January 16, 2007 at 12:34:31 PM
Article: "It Is Not Whether Or Not To Audit Elections, But HOW!"
I agree. No voting machine should be trusted - so AUDIT
Tuesday, January 16, 2007 at 10:45:32 AM
Article: "It Is Not Whether Or Not To Audit Elections, But HOW!"
Please read the above press release
Monday, January 15, 2007 at 7:25:12 PM
Article: "CT: National Model for Election Security - 20% manual Audits"
Interesting that you support hand counting LESS than 20%
Sunday, January 14, 2007 at 7:32:29 PM
Article: "CT: National Model for Election Security - 20% manual Audits"
I am not a computer expert. I am a mathematician.
Sunday, January 14, 2007 at 5:00:10 PM
Article: "CT: National Model for Election Security - 20% manual Audits"
Nancy Tobi and I both want to ensure election integrity
Sunday, January 14, 2007 at 12:01:38 PM
Article: "CT: National Model for Election Security - 20% manual Audits"
CT is doing election integrity audits - not machine audits
Monday, January 8, 2007 at 2:12:34 AM
Article: "Overview of Major Expert Studies on Voting Systems"
Nice Rady - Here's Another Shorter Summary Too
Sunday, January 7, 2007 at 5:27:49 PM
Article: "The Single Greatest Threat to the Media Reform Movement : E"
I agree with everything - except the REQUEST solution
Saturday, January 6, 2007 at 1:49:30 PM
Article: "The Battle Amongst Election Integrity Groups over Federal Le"
You say you want hand-counts of ballots but fight against it
Friday, January 5, 2007 at 8:44:27 PM
Article: ""Request by Voters" Campaign for Election Reform Catches Fir"
I respect & appreciate Bev'd Work but These Ideas Fall Short
Friday, January 5, 2007 at 6:01:38 PM
Article: "The Battle Amongst Election Integrity Groups over Federal Le"
Most of your criticism is based on your mischaracterizations
Friday, December 22, 2006 at 7:21:52 PM
Article: "Free Trade is Not Free!"
Free Trade OK with Environmental & Worker Protections
Monday, December 18, 2006 at 2:25:53 PM
Article: "Experts for the U.S. Congress to Consult with on Election In"
A 10% ballot sampling procedure is a bad idea IMO
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 12:05:05 PM
Article: "Experts for the U.S. Congress to Consult with on Election In"
Again you mischaracterize our manual audit proposals
Saturday, December 16, 2006 at 12:24:54 PM
Article: "New Voting Method to Improve Democracy is Catching On"
IRV voting would complicate achieving election integrity
Friday, December 15, 2006 at 11:35:04 AM
Article: "My Suggestions for Congress"
We also need to assure the integrity of election outcomes
Friday, December 15, 2006 at 11:26:48 AM
Article: "David Dill Unpluggd: Computer glitch leaves electronic voti"
This article is incoherent
Sunday, December 10, 2006 at 1:23:22 PM
Quicklink: "Where's the Vote Fraud?"
Hi Joan - You mean "Voter" Fraud
Friday, December 1, 2006 at 10:35:07 PM
Article: "Recommendations for Federal Legislation to Ensure the Integr"
You misunderstood my comments & mischaracterize my positions
Thursday, November 30, 2006 at 1:11:16 PM
Article: "Recommendations for Federal Legislation to Ensure the Integr"
Most of your comments mischaracterize our recommendations
Thursday, November 23, 2006 at 1:35:25 PM
Article: "HR-2239, HR-550, What Now?"
These Proposals Leave Us Wide-Open to Vote Fraud
Thursday, October 26, 2006 at 12:18:58 AM
Article: "Pull the Plug on E-Voting"
Bruce - Excellent Article
Monday, October 9, 2006 at 12:20:06 PM
Article: "Rampant Voter Fraud in America"
Re. Rampant Voter Fraud in America