Albury Smith
Become a Fan.You'll get emails whenever I post articles on OpEdNews
OpEdNews Member for 189 week(s) and 5 day(s)
2 Articles, 0 Quick Links, 807 Comments, 0 Diaries, 0 Polls
807 Comments
Page 1 of 9 Next Back First Last View All
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 7:39:42 AM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
We can now defeat
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 7:33:10 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Dear Mr. Cappa
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 7:08:13 AM
Great opportunity for you
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 6:33:28 AM
"Shill judges" and lawsuits from the 9/11 "truth movement"
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 6:05:46 AM
First of all,
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 5:39:04 AM
Whoosh! Right over your head.
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 5:17:21 AM
I can't say the same for yours, Aidan
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 7:12:31 PM
What did the thermate do?
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 7:03:08 PM
Were all eleven
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:37:34 PM
Good link
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:28:48 PM
Actually,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:24:33 PM
Mr. M
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:20:15 PM
As I said,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:02:49 PM
There really is no point in this discussion
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 5:23:55 PM
Yeah, Mr. M,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 5:09:48 PM
Sure tops
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:52:54 PM
It's puzzling to me
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:36:37 PM
You're playing with words
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:22:41 PM
You have a bigger problem,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:14:05 PM
That's not investigating, William,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:00:44 PM
Try
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 3:52:54 PM
The "shill"
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 3:29:27 PM
You don't seem too familiar
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 3:05:00 PM
You might find one of these helpful:
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 2:58:33 PM
Thanks,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 2:49:06 PM
Given the fact
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 2:16:30 PM
See that, William?
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 1:42:21 PM
I despise
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 1:39:16 PM
Today's your lucky day, Willaim
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 1:25:37 PM
I suspect
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 1:17:18 PM
You're in luck, William
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 9:55:04 AM
I'm just wondering
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 9:49:09 AM
Here are some of the things
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 9:33:41 AM
It seems odd
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 8:28:52 AM
Bill Maher's answer to the 9/11 "truth movement":
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 8:06:29 AM
Let's poll
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 8:00:30 AM
Here's another bombshell, Waldo:
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 5:10:15 PM
I've often considered
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 4:22:49 PM
I considered it
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 3:53:39 PM
re: "Republicans, Saudis, Israelis" and whatever
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 3:49:36 PM
re: "huh, huh?"
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 2:09:46 PM
OK, let's:
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 1:40:46 PM
How could the evidence be gone
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 1:20:18 PM
So the reason
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 1:14:47 PM
What's wrong with my suggestion
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 1:07:23 PM
What "disinformation group"?
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 11:44:18 AM
The purpose of 9/11
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 11:35:43 AM
Jeepers,
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 9:05:24 AM
Diary : "My Letter Of Support For Daniel Sunjata"
That's swell, Edward
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 8:38:48 AM
In a "movement"
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 9:23:47 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
It never ceases to amaze me
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 6:09:32 PM
Give truth a chance first, Jon.
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 12:31:23 PM
Leslie E. Robertson
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 12:11:58 PM
....
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 10:42:29 AM
The last place you want to go
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 10:09:22 AM
Try to keep up
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 6:23:46 AM
No, I don't recall that memo,
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 10:23:37 PM
Gee whiz,
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 10:10:02 PM
Your worst enemy
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 9:22:14 PM
Here are three more "attacks"
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 7:20:57 PM
Quicklink : "911 Truth Hits Mainstream TV"
Some Americans
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 1:06:29 PM
Here are some legitimate questions for you,
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 7:08:14 AM
There's no law against ignorance,
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:57:43 PM
What a bunch of crap
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:34:56 PM
Which building?
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:26:45 PM
"inadequaite [sic] and irrelivant [sic]"
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:09:53 PM
Your "experts"
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 6:59:01 PM
LOL
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 5:34:48 PM
Reality check, "hat shot"
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 5:16:34 PM
No, "George,"
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 4:46:11 PM
Nice spamfest,
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 4:37:16 PM
Nice job of mangling the truth,
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 4:06:16 PM
When did Bush
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 3:29:01 PM
Thanks for the link, Perry
Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 7:58:20 PM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
Pay your fees where they'll really do some good, David
Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 7:33:54 AM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
Is that Nick Berg
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:54:47 PM
Here's a clue for you, David.
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:43:31 PM
It should be simple enough to prove,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:35:52 PM
That's proof
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:23:01 PM
Their names and job titles were furnished by you,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:20:49 PM
So why is it
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:16:03 PM
Sign me up, Alan
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 6:59:17 PM
I didn't see him say that,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 6:38:02 PM
Since you're
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 6:08:20 PM
Yep,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 5:58:16 PM
So from a short list
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 5:44:59 PM
Thanks, that's one of the funniest things you've posted yet
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 5:15:33 PM
Yes, you are
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 4:55:48 PM
What actions and whose crime?
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 3:45:21 PM
Diary : "Hear 9/11 Truth Teachin Marathon Sunday on NO LIES RADIO ---"
Jones, Griffin, Gage
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 11:31:16 AM
It's a pity
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:52:00 AM
Did all of the thousands of
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:43:19 AM
These "experts working
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:38:44 AM
You're
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:34:42 AM
Your argument's lost
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:25:26 AM
Sorry,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:20:08 AM
You claimed
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:14:12 AM
I connected them,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:05:53 AM
Just because
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:00:30 AM
Yes,
807 Comments
Page 1 of 9 Next Back First Last View All
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 7:39:42 AM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
We can now defeat
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 7:33:10 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Dear Mr. Cappa
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 7:08:13 AM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
Great opportunity for you
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 6:33:28 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
"Shill judges" and lawsuits from the 9/11 "truth movement"
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 6:05:46 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
First of all,
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 5:39:04 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Whoosh! Right over your head.
Monday, February 9, 2009 at 5:17:21 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
I can't say the same for yours, Aidan
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 7:12:31 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
What did the thermate do?
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 7:03:08 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Were all eleven
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:37:34 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Good link
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:28:48 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Actually,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:24:33 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Mr. M
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:20:15 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
As I said,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 6:02:49 PM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
There really is no point in this discussion
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 5:23:55 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Yeah, Mr. M,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 5:09:48 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Sure tops
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:52:54 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
It's puzzling to me
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:36:37 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
You're playing with words
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:22:41 PM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
You have a bigger problem,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:14:05 PM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
That's not investigating, William,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 4:00:44 PM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
Try
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 3:52:54 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
The "shill"
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 3:29:27 PM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
You don't seem too familiar
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 3:05:00 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
You might find one of these helpful:
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 2:58:33 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Thanks,
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 2:49:06 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Given the fact
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 2:16:30 PM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
See that, William?
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 1:42:21 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
I despise
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 1:39:16 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Today's your lucky day, Willaim
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 1:25:37 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
I suspect
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 1:17:18 PM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
You're in luck, William
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 9:55:04 AM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
I'm just wondering
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 9:49:09 AM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
Here are some of the things
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 9:33:41 AM
Article : "Top Counter-Terrorism Experts Question 9/11"
It seems odd
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 8:28:52 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Bill Maher's answer to the 9/11 "truth movement":
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 8:06:29 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Let's poll
Sunday, February 8, 2009 at 8:00:30 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Here's another bombshell, Waldo:
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 5:10:15 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
I've often considered
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 4:22:49 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
I considered it
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 3:53:39 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
re: "Republicans, Saudis, Israelis" and whatever
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 3:49:36 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
re: "huh, huh?"
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 2:09:46 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
OK, let's:
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 1:40:46 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
How could the evidence be gone
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 1:20:18 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
So the reason
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 1:14:47 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
What's wrong with my suggestion
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 1:07:23 PM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
What "disinformation group"?
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 11:44:18 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
The purpose of 9/11
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 11:35:43 AM
Poll : "Poll: Obama Should Commission An Independent 9/11 Special Pr"
Jeepers,
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 9:05:24 AM
Diary : "My Letter Of Support For Daniel Sunjata"
That's swell, Edward
Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 8:38:48 AM
Diary : "My Letter Of Support For Daniel Sunjata"
In a "movement"
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 9:23:47 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
It never ceases to amaze me
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 6:09:32 PM
Diary : "My Letter Of Support For Daniel Sunjata"
Give truth a chance first, Jon.
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 12:31:23 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
Leslie E. Robertson
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 12:11:58 PM
Diary : "My Letter Of Support For Daniel Sunjata"
....
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 10:42:29 AM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
The last place you want to go
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 10:09:22 AM
Diary : "My Letter Of Support For Daniel Sunjata"
Try to keep up
Friday, February 6, 2009 at 6:23:46 AM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
No, I don't recall that memo,
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 10:23:37 PM
Diary : "My Letter Of Support For Daniel Sunjata"
Gee whiz,
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 10:10:02 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
Your worst enemy
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 9:22:14 PM
Diary : "My Letter Of Support For Daniel Sunjata"
Here are three more "attacks"
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 7:20:57 PM
Quicklink : "911 Truth Hits Mainstream TV"
Some Americans
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 1:06:29 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
Here are some legitimate questions for you,
Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 7:08:14 AM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
There's no law against ignorance,
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:57:43 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
What a bunch of crap
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:34:56 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
Which building?
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:26:45 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
"inadequaite [sic] and irrelivant [sic]"
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:09:53 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
Your "experts"
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 6:59:01 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
LOL
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 5:34:48 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
Reality check, "hat shot"
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 5:16:34 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
No, "George,"
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 4:46:11 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
Nice spamfest,
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 4:37:16 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
Nice job of mangling the truth,
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 4:06:16 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
When did Bush
Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 3:29:01 PM
Article : "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"
Thanks for the link, Perry
Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 7:58:20 PM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
Pay your fees where they'll really do some good, David
Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 7:33:54 AM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
Is that Nick Berg
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:54:47 PM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
Here's a clue for you, David.
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:43:31 PM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
It should be simple enough to prove,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:35:52 PM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
That's proof
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:23:01 PM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
Their names and job titles were furnished by you,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:20:49 PM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
So why is it
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:16:03 PM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
Sign me up, Alan
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 6:59:17 PM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
I didn't see him say that,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 6:38:02 PM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
Since you're
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 6:08:20 PM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
Yep,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 5:58:16 PM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
So from a short list
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 5:44:59 PM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
Thanks, that's one of the funniest things you've posted yet
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 5:15:33 PM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
Yes, you are
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 4:55:48 PM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
What actions and whose crime?
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 3:45:21 PM
Diary : "Hear 9/11 Truth Teachin Marathon Sunday on NO LIES RADIO ---"
Jones, Griffin, Gage
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 11:31:16 AM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
It's a pity
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:52:00 AM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
Did all of the thousands of
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:43:19 AM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
These "experts working
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:38:44 AM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
You're
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:34:42 AM
Article : "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"
Your argument's lost
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:25:26 AM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
Sorry,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:20:08 AM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
You claimed
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:14:12 AM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
I connected them,
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:05:53 AM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
Just because
Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:00:30 AM
Article : "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""
Yes,
Page 1 of 9 Next Back First Last View All