OpEdNews - Comments - Author's Page for albury smith

That's swell, Edward

Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 8:38:48 AM

In a "movement"

Friday, February 6, 2009 at 9:23:47 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

It never ceases to amaze me

Friday, February 6, 2009 at 6:09:32 PM

Give truth a chance first, Jon.

Friday, February 6, 2009 at 12:31:23 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

Leslie E. Robertson

Friday, February 6, 2009 at 12:11:58 PM

....

Friday, February 6, 2009 at 10:42:29 AM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

The last place you want to go

Friday, February 6, 2009 at 10:09:22 AM

Try to keep up

Friday, February 6, 2009 at 6:23:46 AM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

No, I don't recall that memo,

Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 10:23:37 PM

Gee whiz,

Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 10:10:02 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

Your worst enemy

Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 9:22:14 PM

Here are three more "attacks"

Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 7:20:57 PM

Quicklink: "911 Truth Hits Mainstream TV"

Some Americans

Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 1:06:29 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

Here are some legitimate questions for you,

Thursday, February 5, 2009 at 7:08:14 AM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

There's no law against ignorance,

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:57:43 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

What a bunch of crap

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:34:56 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

Which building?

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:26:45 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

"inadequaite [sic] and irrelivant [sic]"

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 7:09:53 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

Your "experts"

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 6:59:01 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

LOL

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 5:34:48 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

Reality check, "hat shot"

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 5:16:34 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

No, "George,"

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 4:46:11 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

Nice spamfest,

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 4:37:16 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

Nice job of mangling the truth,

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 4:06:16 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

When did Bush

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 3:29:01 PM

Article: "Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Offic"

Thanks for the link, Perry

Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 7:58:20 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Pay your fees where they'll really do some good, David

Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 7:33:54 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Is that Nick Berg

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:54:47 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Here's a clue for you, David.

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:43:31 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

It should be simple enough to prove,

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:35:52 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

That's proof

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:23:01 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Their names and job titles were furnished by you,

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:20:49 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

So why is it

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:16:03 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Sign me up, Alan

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 6:59:17 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I didn't see him say that,

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 6:38:02 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Since you're

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 6:08:20 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Yep,

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 5:58:16 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

So from a short list

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 5:44:59 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Thanks, that's one of the funniest things you've posted yet

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 5:15:33 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Yes, you are

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 4:55:48 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

What actions and whose crime?

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 3:45:21 PM

Diary: "Hear 9/11 Truth Teachin Marathon Sunday on NO LIES RADIO ---"

Jones, Griffin, Gage

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 11:31:16 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

It's a pity

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:52:00 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Did all of the thousands of

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:43:19 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

These "experts working

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:38:44 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

You're

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:34:42 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Your argument's lost

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:25:26 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Sorry,

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:20:08 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

You claimed

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:14:12 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I connected them,

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:05:53 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Just because

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:00:30 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Yes,

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:14:26 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Good point, Paul

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 8:59:23 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Do you have a directory of the Pentagon,

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 8:45:36 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

William of Occam

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 8:02:35 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

How did CDI

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:56:20 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

It was found inside the Pentagon,

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:52:19 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

They didn't

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:45:54 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

So which one?

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:42:44 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I just described him

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:32:33 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Pick your own video

Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:26:51 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

"High decimal"

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:55:48 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I've also seen "proof"

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:46:21 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

The main part of the problem

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:39:32 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I submit

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:23:03 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

One of your fellow "theorists"

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:19:10 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Thanks, but I prefer

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:14:14 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I don't

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:09:28 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

That's not what appears stupid

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 1:58:05 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I told you what you should do

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 1:52:12 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I noticed

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 1:48:47 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

More hogwash from the "truth movement"

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 1:40:52 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I guess you didn't read

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 1:37:07 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

No particular knowledge

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 1:24:17 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Sure they were

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 12:48:12 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Isn't everyone

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 12:43:24 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

And if it doesn't,

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 12:38:16 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

re:"mr M kicks it up a notch"

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 12:32:48 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

What's yours?

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 12:26:55 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

If that's all you looked at,

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 12:16:26 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

YOUR mistake

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 12:13:48 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Legend

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 11:58:56 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

We're past that point.

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 11:55:24 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Half the time,

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 11:47:31 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

It's what you don't see.

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 11:34:44 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

You'd love

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 11:30:02 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

How did

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 11:19:39 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

What advice?

Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 11:15:25 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Why would I have to do that?

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 9:55:22 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Thanks for sharing, Wael,

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 9:33:03 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Your "surge in put options"

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 9:26:30 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

"Your" funny, "to"

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 8:50:28 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Good point

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 8:21:15 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Jones

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 7:36:22 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Why don't you

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 7:23:40 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

William,

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 7:16:12 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

"Vaporized plane"

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 1:18:34 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I have a suggestion for you too.

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 1:11:23 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Sure, William

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 1:03:46 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Good point

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 12:52:33 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Great post Rammy,

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 12:48:18 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

There are just too many

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 12:44:23 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Berg

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 12:35:20 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Here's another conspiracy

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 12:26:48 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Gee thanks, William

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 12:21:19 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

If NIST made the whole thing up,

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 12:08:08 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

A suggestion for you, William

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 12:01:30 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

I see you're mathematically challenged, too

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 11:34:13 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

The people

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 11:21:53 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Have you seen an optometrist recently?

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 11:07:49 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Right over your head

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 10:50:15 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

If you're really an engineer

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 9:19:53 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Would they be equally amusing

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 9:05:43 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

That's odd.

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 8:48:04 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

No way and no how

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 8:31:54 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

From your "gradeschool level understanding of gravity,"

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 8:19:35 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Bye, bye, Robert

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 8:13:15 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Free-fall time is an exaggeration,

Saturday, January 31, 2009 at 7:52:50 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

So you visited the WTC towers once,

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 4:45:55 PM

Article: "President Obama, Let Peltier Live!"

Yes, it sounds fair

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 4:00:12 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Common sense

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 1:44:18 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Then what's

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 1:05:32 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Why is it traitorous

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 12:48:44 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Why don't you

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 12:35:03 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Way to go, William

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 12:31:40 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Tell us why

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 12:17:30 PM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

"Slower than that"

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 9:56:17 AM

Article: "An avalanche of documentation that 9/11 was an "inside job""

Why don't you

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 9:49:22 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

What Hollywood technicalities

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 9:27:15 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Please furnish

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 9:04:24 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Thanks, Wael,

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 8:44:42 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

Pity

Friday, January 30, 2009 at 8:29:42 AM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

No, thank YOU, Rammy

Thursday, January 29, 2009 at 9:03:33 PM

Article: "President Obama, Let Peltier Live!"

Peltier is living

Thursday, January 29, 2009 at 6:57:22 PM

Article: "Facts Suggest Motivation For 911 Far More Complicated Than A"

You're in luck, William.

Thursday, January 29, 2009 at 5:50:25 PM

Read and learn,

Thursday, January 29, 2009 at 5:48:11 PM

I can't tell

Thursday, January 29, 2009 at 5:38:37 PM

That's because they were carefully written

Thursday, January 29, 2009 at 2:36:19 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

The only Pentagon mystery

Thursday, January 29, 2009 at 7:49:17 AM

Mark Roberts

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 at 7:35:10 PM

Article: "I'm Not Leaving the Country After All"

I've already connected the dots, Eileen,

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 at 7:25:02 PM

NIST has responded

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 at 6:41:49 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

There's a big difference

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 at 2:49:43 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

The flight capability

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 at 9:05:21 AM

Article: "I'm Not Leaving the Country After All"

In all honesty,

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 9:00:22 PM

correction:

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 8:56:23 PM

Reality check

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 7:12:30 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Your link doesn't work,

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 6:50:18 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

What happened on 9/11 isn't rocket science,

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 5:37:15 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Educated guesses

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 5:04:58 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Oh, quit it

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 4:50:00 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

"Cruise missile"

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 12:19:56 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Why don't you

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 12:12:34 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

I addressed it

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 12:06:41 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Ducks, Geese, MISSILES, or BOMBS, David?

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 11:47:23 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

How many of your

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 10:55:41 AM

A real patriot

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 9:36:54 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Where are you going with this, David?

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 9:18:08 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Meridian Plaza

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 9:02:20 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Barry Jennings' "truth"

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 8:08:35 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Two interesting facts about watermelons

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 10:39:52 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Where's yours?

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 10:24:55 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

You just stated

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 9:51:47 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Career suggestion

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 9:41:49 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

So did NIST

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 9:23:36 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Only one or two people

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 7:50:33 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

The concept of a "Heat Sink"

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 7:43:42 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

What force

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 7:28:07 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Hani Hanjour

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 7:16:09 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

He's yours, William.

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 6:56:55 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

The other stuff

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 6:23:39 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

The nitty gritty

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 5:50:23 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

"737 engine"

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 9:11:17 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

No planes, Robert?

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 8:21:48 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

"Impressive new group"

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 7:53:33 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Gee, what a coincidence

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 7:19:17 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Shills?

Monday, January 26, 2009 at 6:53:27 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Hijackers' ID

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 10:22:05 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

"LOL ... you're funny ..."

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 9:14:30 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Would you please post the 5 explanations

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 8:26:27 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Be careful, Alan

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 2:54:59 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Not your day, Cosmic :-))

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 2:35:46 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

No problem,

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 1:26:39 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

The tonnage of the steel

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 12:53:03 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

The mass differential

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 12:29:38 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

I'd have found your link more stimulating

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 12:03:49 PM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Who told Giuliani

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 11:42:28 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

All of those tons of evidence

Sunday, January 25, 2009 at 10:31:21 AM

Article: "Unanswered 9/11 Miracles about To Be Answered"

Would you please post

Saturday, January 24, 2009 at 8:31:40 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Bon Voyage

Saturday, January 24, 2009 at 1:44:27 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Newsweek

Saturday, January 24, 2009 at 11:51:37 AM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

What a classic straw man argument

Saturday, January 24, 2009 at 11:14:24 AM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

The key word there is "assembled"

Friday, January 23, 2009 at 10:07:11 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Earth to Mike

Friday, January 23, 2009 at 10:29:53 AM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Some more questions for you

Friday, January 23, 2009 at 7:35:52 AM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Don't you wish you'd left sooner, Mike?

Thursday, January 22, 2009 at 10:13:43 AM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

With your newer version,

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 at 10:06:30 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Here's some Kool-Aid for you:

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 at 12:24:14 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

re: "Where are the pictures of the bowed trusses?"

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 at 11:03:17 AM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Please try making some sense for a change

Tuesday, January 20, 2009 at 2:40:24 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

re: your comedy of errors

Sunday, January 18, 2009 at 4:50:53 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Who cares?

Sunday, January 18, 2009 at 4:40:44 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Although all 7 WTC buildings were totaled on 9/11,

Saturday, January 17, 2009 at 7:13:50 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

I'm puzzled by your lack of interest in the facts, Mike

Saturday, January 17, 2009 at 11:32:51 AM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

The real story

Thursday, January 15, 2009 at 9:56:48 PM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

David's "great video"

Thursday, January 15, 2009 at 6:53:16 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

What I believe

Thursday, January 15, 2009 at 7:47:34 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

re: Your last two posts

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 at 7:51:43 PM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

Some suggestions

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 at 11:43:35 AM

Diary: "Snap out of it"

You need to get your facts straight

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 at 8:47:39 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

No, I try to provide factual information and stay on topic,

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 at 8:35:24 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

Yes, it's not only improbable, or impossible,

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 9:49:15 PM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

So why don't you answer it?

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 5:40:24 PM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

You already know

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 5:13:55 PM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

You already claim to know

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 5:07:38 PM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

re: What David finds interesting

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 10:45:28 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

Have you ever bothered

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 8:49:29 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

How telling

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 8:39:29 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

Here's what NIST "admits,"

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 8:30:54 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

Are Ron Insana, Ashley Banfield,

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 7:42:10 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

How many NYC firefighters

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 8:10:31 PM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

Quick question, JG

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 7:13:04 PM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

Wrong again, JG.

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 4:46:48 PM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

It's a typical

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 8:11:19 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

You could state hundreds of reasons,

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 8:05:30 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

How curious

Monday, January 12, 2009 at 8:02:35 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

You've been duped

Sunday, January 11, 2009 at 11:35:39 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

Since you've done the research,

Sunday, January 11, 2009 at 9:47:03 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

I simply asked a question, Mr. M

Sunday, January 11, 2009 at 7:43:56 AM

Diary: "Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11"

What kind of explosives were used?

Saturday, January 10, 2009 at 9:38:14 PM

Article: "Towering Obstacles Prosecuting the Oscar Grant Killing"

Probably not

Saturday, January 10, 2009 at 4:15:19 PM

Article: "Towering Obstacles Prosecuting the Oscar Grant Killing"

It was a horrible incident,

Saturday, January 10, 2009 at 4:03:58 PM

Article: "Towering Obstacles Prosecuting the Oscar Grant Killing"

Did the rioters

Saturday, January 10, 2009 at 10:43:41 AM

Article: "Towering Obstacles Prosecuting the Oscar Grant Killing"

The guy's toast,

Saturday, January 10, 2009 at 8:48:40 AM

Diary: "9/11 Truth Goes Global"

Yep

Friday, January 9, 2009 at 8:58:13 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

No asbestos?

Friday, January 9, 2009 at 5:55:10 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

Have you

Friday, January 9, 2009 at 5:29:24 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

Which of us is reaching?

Thursday, January 8, 2009 at 5:34:02 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

How does collapse time

Thursday, January 8, 2009 at 5:21:48 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

That's just brilliant

Tuesday, January 6, 2009 at 7:56:32 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

The collapse of WTC 7

Tuesday, January 6, 2009 at 2:56:48 PM

Diary: "(9/11) NIST: a. Free Fall Requires No Resistance b. WTC7 was"

No problem at all

Tuesday, January 6, 2009 at 2:30:08 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

I posted one

Tuesday, January 6, 2009 at 7:49:45 AM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

Selective indignation?

Monday, January 5, 2009 at 5:59:03 PM

Diary: "(9/11) NIST: a. Free Fall Requires No Resistance b. WTC7 was"

Chandler

Monday, January 5, 2009 at 5:53:24 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

There's almost no sound emission,

Monday, January 5, 2009 at 5:46:14 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

The AE911"Truth"

Monday, January 5, 2009 at 5:43:02 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

Chandler and Steven Jones

Monday, January 5, 2009 at 11:16:53 AM

Diary: "(9/11) NIST: a. Free Fall Requires No Resistance b. WTC7 was"

New tactic

Monday, January 5, 2009 at 10:46:54 AM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

Rhetorical questions

Monday, January 5, 2009 at 10:42:28 AM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

There are several steps

Monday, January 5, 2009 at 9:29:44 AM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

I thought you said you read NCSTAR 1A, David

Monday, January 5, 2009 at 8:13:03 AM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

Here are some more

Sunday, January 4, 2009 at 8:19:52 PM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

Helpful for what?

Sunday, January 4, 2009 at 7:36:59 PM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

As usual,

Sunday, January 4, 2009 at 7:16:36 PM

Diary: "9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / Fals"

One thing's for sure

Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 4:06:16 PM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

I'd don't know if I'd go that far, Brett.

Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 1:50:38 PM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

What is your point?

Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 9:00:37 AM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

McCoy

Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 8:19:17 AM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

What

Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 8:15:20 AM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

A suggestion

Friday, January 2, 2009 at 10:04:30 PM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

You and I

Friday, January 2, 2009 at 6:54:27 PM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

And I'll settle for

Friday, January 2, 2009 at 6:28:28 PM

Diary: "Able Danger: 9/11 Truth Night In Wayne, PA"

There's probably

Friday, January 2, 2009 at 6:10:32 PM

Diary: "Able Danger: 9/11 Truth Night In Wayne, PA"

Occam's Razor

Friday, January 2, 2009 at 4:37:05 PM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

We're about to get rid of

Friday, January 2, 2009 at 10:20:43 AM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

The three

Friday, January 2, 2009 at 9:37:01 AM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

Your responses actually are laughable, Mr. M

Friday, January 2, 2009 at 9:29:07 AM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

Post Script

Friday, January 2, 2009 at 8:12:33 AM

Diary: "Obama's Change.gov & 9/11 investigation Vote!"

Factors that cannot be overlooked

Thursday, January 1, 2009 at 1:55:27 PM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

You're funny too

Thursday, January 1, 2009 at 10:45:48 AM

Diary: "Able Danger: 9/11 Truth Night In Wayne, PA"

What part

Wednesday, December 31, 2008 at 8:39:36 PM

Diary: "Able Danger: 9/11 Truth Night In Wayne, PA"

Here are

Wednesday, December 31, 2008 at 11:00:08 AM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

You're welcome, Scott

Tuesday, December 30, 2008 at 7:16:50 PM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

YOU show me the 9/11 terrorists,

Tuesday, December 30, 2008 at 7:12:46 PM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

Typical "Mr. M" comment

Tuesday, December 30, 2008 at 7:01:23 PM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

Anyone

Tuesday, December 30, 2008 at 5:33:49 PM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

You're not playing with me,

Tuesday, December 30, 2008 at 5:04:57 PM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

I have no doubt, either

Tuesday, December 30, 2008 at 3:56:08 PM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

In a real court of law,

Tuesday, December 30, 2008 at 3:41:41 PM

Article: "URGENT! Israeli Navy Attacking Civilian Mercy Ship! TAKE ACT"

More information needed

Tuesday, December 30, 2008 at 11:36:51 AM

Diary: "He's Kept Us Safe"

I know

Monday, December 29, 2008 at 1:10:37 PM

How typical...

Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 8:07:43 PM

You

Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 4:42:54 PM

I don't know

Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 11:14:22 AM

I'm hoping for a miracle too

Saturday, December 27, 2008 at 7:53:09 AM

Quicklink: "Secretary of Transportation Testifies Cheney Aware of Jet Fl"

Another minor point

Friday, December 26, 2008 at 6:20:20 PM

Diary: "911lb. Gorilla"

What was

Thursday, December 25, 2008 at 1:41:36 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

A suggestion, David:

Thursday, December 25, 2008 at 9:56:12 AM

Diary: "Rumsfeld, Cheney, Myers-Sued on 9/11 Conspiracy Charges"

Is your first link

Thursday, December 25, 2008 at 9:10:56 AM

Quicklink: "Dick Cheney: Osama Bin Laden Not Involved in 9/11"

The official reason

Thursday, December 25, 2008 at 8:10:52 AM

Quicklink: "Secretary of Transportation Testifies Cheney Aware of Jet Fl"

That's hilarious, Wizard

Thursday, December 25, 2008 at 8:01:50 AM

Diary: "Rumsfeld, Cheney, Myers, Sued on 9/11 Conspiracy Charges"

I hope she gets a judge who's brighter than you and Gene are

Wednesday, December 24, 2008 at 6:41:27 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

This is certainly an exciting discovery

Wednesday, December 24, 2008 at 8:54:24 AM

Quicklink: "Secretary of Transportation Testifies Cheney Aware of Jet Fl"

If you'd like a plausible explanation

Monday, December 22, 2008 at 7:03:13 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Gag order

Monday, December 22, 2008 at 6:53:42 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

They were closer than you were, Boris,

Monday, December 22, 2008 at 6:51:49 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

If you're claiming that your picture,

Monday, December 22, 2008 at 6:36:39 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

You must have missed this, Boris

Monday, December 22, 2008 at 5:49:49 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Yes, it's very simple, David

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 6:27:16 PM

Quicklink: "Secretary of Transportation Testifies Cheney Aware of Jet Fl"

I'd recommend

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 3:40:05 PM

Quicklink: "Secretary of Transportation Testifies Cheney Aware of Jet Fl"

You STILL haven't

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 2:51:38 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

That's

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 2:46:54 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

That's all the more reason

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 2:33:36 PM

Quicklink: "Secretary of Transportation Testifies Cheney Aware of Jet Fl"

You

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 1:23:33 PM

Quicklink: "Dick Cheney's 9/11 Connection"

Facts

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 10:57:43 AM

Quicklink: "Dick Cheney: Osama Bin Laden Not Involved in 9/11"

Since

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 10:41:46 AM

Quicklink: "Secretary of Transportation Testifies Cheney Aware of Jet Fl"

Truthseeking

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 10:33:57 AM

Quicklink: "Secretary of Transportation Testifies Cheney Aware of Jet Fl"

How did your "missile"

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 10:18:52 AM

Quicklink: "Dick Cheney's 9/11 Connection"

Cheney

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 10:11:32 AM

Quicklink: "FBI says, it has "No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9"

The FBI

Sunday, December 21, 2008 at 10:04:53 AM

Quicklink: "Dick Cheney: Osama Bin Laden Not Involved in 9/11"

Rumsfeld

Saturday, December 20, 2008 at 11:30:43 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Do you

Saturday, December 20, 2008 at 10:42:33 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

The blue tarp

Saturday, December 20, 2008 at 10:35:31 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Here's the NTSB's report on the FDR:

Friday, December 19, 2008 at 9:39:11 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Why should we discount the FDR this time?

Friday, December 19, 2008 at 8:38:10 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Really simple, David

Friday, December 19, 2008 at 7:52:44 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

What altitude?

Friday, December 19, 2008 at 5:20:47 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

I'll answer again, David

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 8:10:31 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

If you

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 2:35:19 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

FDR time delay

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 8:13:09 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

The great Richard Gage

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 6:36:14 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Better be careful, Boris/ Dave/ Alburara...

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 6:29:18 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

You need

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 6:24:27 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

The dust clouds

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 6:18:01 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Suggestion for you, Boris

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 6:13:03 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Too funny

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 5:55:30 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

No problem, Boris

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 5:51:54 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Wtf is WRONG with you, Boris/ Dave/ Alburara...?

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 5:34:27 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Flight Manifests

Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 5:19:39 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

OK, Boris/ Dave/ Alburara/ Albvry/ Stephen/ Alan,

Wednesday, December 17, 2008 at 4:54:12 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Good source, Alan,

Wednesday, December 17, 2008 at 4:42:13 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Their "initial lie,"

Wednesday, December 17, 2008 at 4:32:13 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Yes, Boris/ Dave/ Alburara/ Albvry/ Stephen/ Alan,

Wednesday, December 17, 2008 at 2:03:52 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

FDRs

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 at 6:12:29 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Richard Gage

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 at 6:00:30 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

I know, Dave

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 at 5:50:36 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Yes, it was mostly drywall,

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 at 4:32:13 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Hard evidence

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 at 4:22:04 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Is al Qaeda

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 at 4:19:53 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Good move, Ken

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 at 4:12:29 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

So 9/11

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 at 3:59:24 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Have you

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 at 3:50:38 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

Your arguments are ridiculous

Monday, December 15, 2008 at 7:04:39 AM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

re: "instead of"

Sunday, December 14, 2008 at 7:53:23 PM

Diary: "(UPDATED) 9/11 and the NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, and"

The best part

Sunday, December 14, 2008 at 4:17:15 PM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

There are

Saturday, December 13, 2008 at 9:34:41 AM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

There's nothing funnier

Friday, December 12, 2008 at 8:44:06 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

"Another 9/11 disinformation troll"?

Thursday, December 11, 2008 at 5:05:13 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

Is your name Erik now,

Thursday, December 11, 2008 at 1:19:02 PM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

Thanks for reading it, Peter

Thursday, December 11, 2008 at 7:17:46 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

Red hot steel

Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 7:06:28 PM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

I knew that Davidsson

Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 1:30:18 PM

Article: "The Goldman Conspiracy"

You're embarrassing yourself even further, Tony

Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 11:49:48 AM

Article: "The Goldman Conspiracy"

No, you proved mine

Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 11:12:04 AM

Article: "The Goldman Conspiracy"

Your concept of conspiracies

Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 10:06:15 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

Jonathan Barnett

Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 8:54:12 AM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

Great video, Sonny

Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 8:26:17 AM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

Making up more facts, Erik?

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 7:59:25 PM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

What does this prove,

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 7:31:35 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

The fact that

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 7:21:44 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

I don't have to guess

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 7:07:20 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

More BS from Erik

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 6:26:50 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

There are good reasons

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 4:46:38 PM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

I just want to know

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 4:41:44 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

Sonny,

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 1:15:58 PM

Article: "The Goldman Conspiracy"

You've fabricated a "Goldman conspiracy,"

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 11:03:44 AM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

Assuming

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 10:01:37 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

Try to keep up, Tom

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 7:59:45 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

When

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 7:33:07 AM

Article: "The Goldman Conspiracy"

Wrong again, sport

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 6:58:08 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

If the towers were blown up,

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 6:41:58 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

Have you

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 6:07:51 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

re: "I missed something"

Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 5:58:06 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

I think I can explain

Monday, December 8, 2008 at 8:10:33 PM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

Free-fall

Monday, December 8, 2008 at 7:23:11 PM

Why would NIST

Monday, December 8, 2008 at 3:32:43 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

To reiterate

Monday, December 8, 2008 at 3:03:21 PM

Some advice

Monday, December 8, 2008 at 2:34:39 PM

Article: "The Goldman Conspiracy"

The media

Monday, December 8, 2008 at 9:28:04 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

I've already explained this to you,

Monday, December 8, 2008 at 9:07:04 AM

Article: "The Goldman Conspiracy"

re: "Goldman Article"

Monday, December 8, 2008 at 8:55:55 AM

If you actually read NCSTAR1,

Monday, December 8, 2008 at 8:15:33 AM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

Nice straw man, Erik

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 5:34:00 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

Hilarious

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 4:46:23 PM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

I've addressed

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 2:54:31 PM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

It's interesting

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 2:38:43 PM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

You're just being dishonest now

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 2:08:04 PM

You're the one who's ignoring facts, sport,

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 11:02:38 AM

Quicklink: "New World Trade Center Collapse Videos"

The new videos,

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 10:37:57 AM

Article: "The Goldman Conspiracy"

Ron Goldman

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 10:10:14 AM

Are you saying

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 10:02:18 AM

Why

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 9:55:02 AM

There was a

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 9:14:00 AM

Are you a

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 9:04:40 AM

I've already

Sunday, December 7, 2008 at 8:35:35 AM

Diary: "Media Matters Catalogues Gibson-Bush Interview Spin, Omits P"

GeeDubya

Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 8:12:27 PM

William...

Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 7:59:46 PM

re: "Crime scene"

Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 7:13:30 PM

Incendiaries

Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 6:52:17 PM

Yes, it was thorough, open, and independent,

Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 2:51:25 PM

That's just lovely, William

Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 8:11:56 AM

From what I've read

Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 7:46:33 AM

What a comedy of errors

Friday, December 5, 2008 at 2:41:58 PM

Diary: "Change.NOT: Left Gatekeeper Blocks Support for 9/11 Commissi"

It's too bad

Friday, December 5, 2008 at 10:42:42 AM

Diary: "Change.NOT: Left Gatekeeper Blocks Support for 9/11 Commissi"

Are you deliberately lying, Ramsheyi,

Friday, December 5, 2008 at 7:54:14 AM

Diary: "Change.NOT: Left Gatekeeper Blocks Support for 9/11 Commissi"

Subhumans

Friday, December 5, 2008 at 7:45:15 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

Airline flight manifests

Friday, December 5, 2008 at 7:41:54 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

One question, Dave

Friday, December 5, 2008 at 7:37:24 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

re: Concrete in the WTC towers

Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 3:16:17 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

That was not an intelligent answer,

Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 11:39:07 AM

Diary: "Change.NOT: Left Gatekeeper Blocks Support for 9/11 Commissi"

Just a reminder, Ramsheyi

Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 9:32:21 AM

Article: "The 2000 Cole bombing: Warm-up for the 9/11 false flag attac"

re: "please provide"

Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 8:49:45 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

Ramsheyi:

Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 8:27:10 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

Please post

Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 8:19:42 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

re: airfones and Albury

Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 7:11:19 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

Then just answer my question,

Wednesday, December 3, 2008 at 6:43:05 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

Said what on camera?

Wednesday, December 3, 2008 at 5:53:30 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

BWO's inconsistencies and confusion

Tuesday, December 2, 2008 at 5:12:15 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

The passport

Tuesday, December 2, 2008 at 7:05:10 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

Didn't you

Monday, December 1, 2008 at 7:45:38 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

Sounds familiar

Monday, December 1, 2008 at 7:05:21 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

The feeling's mutual.

Monday, December 1, 2008 at 6:26:34 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

NIST

Monday, December 1, 2008 at 6:16:29 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

It ain't rocket science, BWO

Monday, December 1, 2008 at 7:32:22 AM

Questions for you too

Monday, December 1, 2008 at 7:17:26 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

You're not?

Sunday, November 30, 2008 at 7:42:52 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

How's this source?

Sunday, November 30, 2008 at 6:02:13 PM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

It's pretty simple

Sunday, November 30, 2008 at 9:45:44 AM

Diary: "The Debate Over 9/11 Truth - Jon Gold & Screw Loose Change"

Who's really "dishonest and a liar"?

Friday, November 28, 2008 at 12:30:03 PM

Diary: "Reflections On Gratitude And Resistance By Janice Matthews"

Just wondering...

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 at 8:58:52 AM

David Ray Griffin

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 8:13:13 PM

Didn't you

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 4:07:56 PM

I'm still waiting for

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 7:12:59 AM

What is wrong with this picture?

Monday, November 24, 2008 at 3:49:01 PM

I'd like to know

Monday, November 24, 2008 at 2:57:54 PM

An order

Monday, November 24, 2008 at 2:53:01 PM

As I said,

Monday, November 24, 2008 at 2:00:08 PM

How do you "know"

Monday, November 24, 2008 at 1:33:46 PM

Munich

Monday, November 24, 2008 at 11:02:02 AM

Good news, Ginger!

Monday, November 24, 2008 at 9:36:08 AM

"Way too much money has been made..."

Sunday, November 23, 2008 at 7:32:30 PM

You're a real patriot, fer sure,

Sunday, November 23, 2008 at 6:25:20 PM

Gee, this is pretty simple...

Sunday, November 23, 2008 at 6:04:12 PM

You're more than sorry

Sunday, November 23, 2008 at 5:12:27 PM

Yep,

Sunday, November 23, 2008 at 11:45:15 AM

Have you...

Sunday, November 23, 2008 at 9:37:49 AM

Larry Silverstein

Saturday, November 22, 2008 at 6:45:08 AM

The point is that you want to stall, evade, and obfuscate

Friday, November 21, 2008 at 8:39:05 AM

So did you

Friday, November 21, 2008 at 6:26:11 AM

Quit ducking the issues

Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 9:14:20 PM

You're busted, Chris

Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 8:28:17 PM

Tom meets reality

Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 5:51:56 PM

Diary: "Boolean Algebra and Probability Theory Prove Official Explan"

More blatant deception from Dave and the "truth movement"

Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 9:04:04 AM

Tom vs the heathens

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 10:35:22 PM

Diary: "Boolean Algebra and Probability Theory Prove Official Explan"

I've noticed...

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 10:27:51 PM

Diary: "Boolean Algebra and Probability Theory Prove Official Explan"

Yes, Ken

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 10:09:29 PM

Diary: "Boolean Algebra and Probability Theory Prove Official Explan"

Speculate on this

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 5:27:21 PM

Four or five nitwits with box cutters,

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 4:40:48 PM

Diary: "Boolean Algebra and Probability Theory Prove Official Explan"

Good grief...

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 3:58:58 PM

You're denying or omitting

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 11:58:22 AM

Diary: "Boolean Algebra and Probability Theory Prove Official Explan"

Prove yours

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 10:47:45 AM

No, thank YOU, Tom

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 9:26:43 AM

I didn't ask to be deliberately misquoted

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 7:34:50 AM

Trying to educate Chris

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 6:19:11 AM

You're welcome, Tom,

Monday, November 17, 2008 at 8:36:15 PM

Diary: "Boolean Algebra and Probability Theory Prove Official Explan"

Better explanations?

Monday, November 17, 2008 at 7:04:16 PM

Whether

Monday, November 17, 2008 at 6:13:15 PM

This video is still available:

Monday, November 17, 2008 at 12:19:15 PM

Why see "Educating Albury,"

Monday, November 17, 2008 at 11:09:16 AM

Still waiting, Chris

Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 9:16:27 PM

Diary: "Boolean Algebra and Probability Theory Prove Official Explan"

Your "researcher"

Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 10:34:49 AM

Mind-boggling, innit?

Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 9:12:10 AM

Let me rephrase that

Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 8:33:12 AM

Figure 12-16?

Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 8:27:14 AM

YOU'RE doubting MY honesty?

Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 8:54:50 PM

Article: "9/11 Explosions-Proof Positive"

Pyroclastic Dust Clouds

Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 7:34:42 PM

correction

Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 7:27:17 PM

My bad

Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 6:02:07 PM

re: Alleged Denial and Doubletalk

Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 10:09:48 AM

::YAWN::

Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 9:57:20 AM

What you find relevant is downright funny

Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 9:50:54 AM

How many times does this have to be explained to you, Chris?

Friday, November 14, 2008 at 8:02:33 PM

re: A conclusive case

Friday, November 14, 2008 at 7:50:56 PM

A real clarification, since you're just repeating yourself

Friday, November 14, 2008 at 11:25:35 AM

Alan Murphy Williams

Friday, November 14, 2008 at 7:59:09 AM

Please explain

Friday, November 14, 2008 at 7:30:41 AM

My point

Friday, November 14, 2008 at 6:45:51 AM

My scenario

Friday, November 14, 2008 at 6:24:41 AM

If NIST is guilty of fraud,

Friday, November 14, 2008 at 6:12:41 AM

If this happened

Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 5:05:20 PM

CHRIS

Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 5:02:43 PM

CHRIS

Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 10:07:13 AM

Further evidence that your "theory" is nonsense

Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 8:15:44 AM

Sure, Harold

Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 8:02:35 AM

Give it up, Chris

Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 7:44:40 PM

Good one

Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 5:49:17 PM

No thanks

Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 4:36:58 PM

Roberts

Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 1:58:00 PM

What a stupid thing to say

Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 1:46:42 PM

OK, just stay ignorant

Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 11:22:53 AM

Hess and Jennings

Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 9:39:34 AM

Earth to Chris

Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 5:49:14 PM

Prove the fraud allegation

Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 1:02:52 PM

Let me simplify this for you, Chris

Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 9:59:50 AM

Reason for reconsidering your premise

Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 9:50:04 AM

All cleared up

Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 9:26:02 AM

You're also stretching the truth a bit

Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 7:11:11 AM

Thanks, Arthur

Monday, November 10, 2008 at 4:50:50 PM

Since there's nothing more to be said,

Monday, November 10, 2008 at 3:01:32 PM

I just had a good laugh

Monday, November 10, 2008 at 2:12:00 PM

More nonsense from the 9/11 "truth movement"

Monday, November 10, 2008 at 9:20:34 AM

Typical nonsense from the 9/11 "truth movement"

Thursday, November 6, 2008 at 8:44:44 PM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

At least

Thursday, November 6, 2008 at 7:42:18 PM

Article: "Why Truthers Need to Vote for Obama"

The bombs in the basement

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 11:26:54 AM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

So what?

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 11:05:47 AM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

I was referring to explosives,

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 9:44:51 AM

Diary: "Okay, People: The Irrefutable 911 Evidence of Government Com"

Can we debate the lies, then?

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 9:06:48 AM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

The video

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 8:48:16 AM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

Why don't you refute some of it

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 6:46:58 AM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

If...

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 6:27:56 AM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

re: Molten Metal

Tuesday, November 4, 2008 at 7:16:00 PM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

Your "evidence"

Tuesday, November 4, 2008 at 6:59:31 PM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

Reality check

Tuesday, November 4, 2008 at 4:54:59 PM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

Good grief

Tuesday, November 4, 2008 at 9:17:04 AM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

What's to work on?

Tuesday, November 4, 2008 at 7:14:25 AM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

Sane people

Monday, November 3, 2008 at 8:08:33 PM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

This may be the wrong forum for you

Monday, November 3, 2008 at 3:51:57 PM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

Time the collapses yourself

Monday, November 3, 2008 at 3:17:21 PM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

Your controlled demolition "hypothesis"

Monday, November 3, 2008 at 2:33:28 PM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

What a comedy of errors!

Monday, November 3, 2008 at 1:48:53 PM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

There's also this thing known as

Monday, November 3, 2008 at 10:52:17 AM

Diary: "The 911 View From Texas: It Was A Lucky Shot"

Controlled demolition technologies

Monday, November 3, 2008 at 9:39:02 AM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

No need to apologize

Monday, November 3, 2008 at 9:09:53 AM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

What you've proven

Monday, November 3, 2008 at 8:43:44 AM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

Sure, post it

Saturday, November 1, 2008 at 7:02:54 AM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

What leap?

Saturday, November 1, 2008 at 6:49:06 AM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

re: your colossal ignorance

Friday, October 31, 2008 at 8:05:29 AM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

I'm glad you're amused

Friday, October 31, 2008 at 7:52:09 AM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

You're not making any sense

Wednesday, October 29, 2008 at 6:33:14 PM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

Matter of time

Wednesday, October 29, 2008 at 6:27:14 PM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

Yes, you're a "no-planer"

Wednesday, October 29, 2008 at 5:19:16 PM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

Separate lawsuit

Wednesday, October 29, 2008 at 8:47:13 AM

Diary: "9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON - Official Release"

Real professionals

Sunday, October 19, 2008 at 3:03:13 PM

Article: "8 House Members View Draft Bill on Independent Science/Tech"

The WTC asbestos lie

Thursday, October 16, 2008 at 8:10:10 AM

Diary: "911 Truth for the Lying Mainstream Media"

The "lying" MSM

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 at 4:16:00 PM

Diary: "911 Truth for the Lying Mainstream Media"

What evidence?

Saturday, October 11, 2008 at 5:49:03 PM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Patent credulousness

Saturday, October 11, 2008 at 11:58:05 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Reply to comment: "here we go again"

Saturday, October 11, 2008 at 9:18:32 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Reply to comment: "problems"

Friday, October 10, 2008 at 12:41:40 PM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

The problems are yours

Friday, October 10, 2008 at 11:31:50 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

You'll accept any theory except the official one

Friday, October 10, 2008 at 9:51:02 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

By the numbers

Friday, October 10, 2008 at 7:20:52 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Make up your mind

Thursday, October 9, 2008 at 8:46:34 PM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Wrong again

Thursday, October 9, 2008 at 1:08:07 PM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Really lame "evidence"

Thursday, October 9, 2008 at 9:05:58 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Noted

Thursday, October 9, 2008 at 8:18:03 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Wow

Thursday, October 9, 2008 at 8:16:12 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Regarding your conspiracy nonsense

Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 8:31:38 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Good point

Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 8:23:39 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Who's really looking foolish?

Tuesday, October 7, 2008 at 5:02:47 PM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Just so you don't misunderstand...

Tuesday, October 7, 2008 at 9:59:33 AM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

More "spiffing little" questions

Monday, October 6, 2008 at 7:21:14 PM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

Silverstein said

Monday, October 6, 2008 at 3:58:41 PM

Quicklink: "9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi"

"Ultimate" showdown?

Friday, October 3, 2008 at 5:23:46 PM

Nice spin

Friday, October 3, 2008 at 12:45:41 PM

Name one

Friday, October 3, 2008 at 11:54:12 AM

I'm waiting

Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 2:37:13 PM

Says who?

Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 1:03:59 PM

Must be lots of

Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 11:47:53 AM

OK, we'll assume it was both

Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 10:57:50 AM

I've also noticed

Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 10:54:44 AM

How hot?

Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 9:22:33 AM

I'm not trying to shut you up,

Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 9:18:35 AM

Arguing with you

Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 7:57:12 AM

And now,

Monday, September 29, 2008 at 6:35:31 PM

A word to the wise...

Monday, September 29, 2008 at 6:18:31 PM

Yes, one thing is for certain

Monday, September 29, 2008 at 5:25:31 PM

Bob

Monday, September 29, 2008 at 5:16:05 PM

What A. Smith believes

Monday, September 29, 2008 at 4:13:43 PM

Was the question too difficult for you?

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 9:21:30 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Have you been able

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 9:07:02 AM

Flight manifests

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 8:56:09 AM

It's a "tad odd"

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 8:34:55 AM

You're doing a piss poor job of it

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 8:30:47 AM

Some people

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 8:29:01 AM

No bodies

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 8:25:34 AM

The members of these organizations

Saturday, September 27, 2008 at 7:30:23 PM

re: Barry Jennings is dead

Saturday, September 27, 2008 at 2:12:38 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

You're right, Dave.

Saturday, September 27, 2008 at 1:44:11 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Should I now be ashamed of serving my country?

Saturday, September 27, 2008 at 1:10:56 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Not a red herring

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 9:07:32 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

No-planers

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 8:25:42 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

A clarification for those who need it

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 8:06:57 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

As a US Army veteran,

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 7:53:41 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

He was a janitor,

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 7:47:06 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

"Alburara"

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 7:28:37 AM

Jeezus, how do I get a post to show up where it's readable?

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 7:22:56 AM

You "truthers" are the ones being contrary,

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 7:20:03 AM

Your "proof"

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 7:09:26 AM

How appropriate

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 7:01:33 AM

You "truthers" are the ones being contrary,

Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 8:03:32 PM

Spare us the histrionics

Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 7:43:26 PM

I did more than question your "researcher's" honesty,

Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 6:01:55 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Jeezus, we've just solved the energy problem

Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 11:38:12 AM

Diary: "Madsen: News of 9/11 WTC North Closed Circuit Video Surfaces"

re: Good Find

Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 11:12:49 AM

It wasn't

Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 8:58:48 AM

That's just remarkable...

Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 7:56:03 AM

A response to your logical fallacies and personal insults

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 8:53:49 PM

You're full of something too

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 7:30:11 PM

Unmistakable

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 7:08:48 PM

New phenomenon?

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 5:51:07 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Please explain

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 5:33:01 PM

Article: "Interview with David Ray Griffin on the Rob Kall Radio Show"

I'm convinced

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 5:20:36 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

That's lovely

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 5:13:52 PM

Anthony Lawson

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 5:09:34 PM

You're easily amused

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 1:31:33 PM

Yes

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 1:06:39 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

CORROBORATING EVIDENCE

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 10:05:09 AM

Easy explanation

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 9:51:21 AM

Article: "Interview with David Ray Griffin on the Rob Kall Radio Show"

What I've noticed

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 9:38:02 AM

Plausible explanations needed

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 8:48:09 AM

The "culprits"

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 7:23:11 AM

Article: "Interview with David Ray Griffin on the Rob Kall Radio Show"

Kicking it up a notch

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 6:37:24 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

"All kinds of explosions"

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 8:43:50 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

It figures

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 8:26:04 PM

Article: "Interview with David Ray Griffin on the Rob Kall Radio Show"

It's still online

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 8:02:51 PM

Article: "Interview with David Ray Griffin on the Rob Kall Radio Show"

Explosives

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 7:15:35 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Your "meteorite"

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 5:42:31 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

With good reason

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 5:39:36 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Jeepers, how did they do that?

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 5:31:41 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

I wonder if

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 5:27:44 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Objectivity

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 3:52:34 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

It's not circumstantial,

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 3:32:47 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Nobody

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 12:27:23 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

The top part of Tower 2

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 12:14:46 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

What did these alleged explosives blow up?

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 11:50:46 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Muslims

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 11:36:10 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

There was no case for controlled demolition

Monday, September 22, 2008 at 11:14:42 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Suggestion

Saturday, September 20, 2008 at 9:03:41 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Whoop de doo

Saturday, September 20, 2008 at 7:30:17 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

My multi-year perspective

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 9:09:46 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Honesty

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 9:06:02 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

It doesn't matter how many people saw them,

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 9:01:02 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

I'm not

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 8:39:29 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

You're still not making sense

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 7:57:50 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

There's a real credible pair

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 7:33:29 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

They explained why they didn't

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 7:22:40 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

re: "hmmm"

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 7:15:20 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Gage and Jones

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 2:57:13 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Wrong

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 2:53:08 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Extensive investigations

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 2:21:41 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 2:11:28 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

It does to me

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 9:04:30 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

What thermate fires?

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 8:34:20 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Traitor

Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 8:31:46 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

I can't wait

Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 8:12:15 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Excuse me, Richard, but

Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 7:59:52 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

I'd rather investigate

Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 7:52:10 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

You finally got something right

Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 7:47:32 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

I'd be glad to

Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 7:38:07 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Real problem

Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 7:29:59 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Not a problem

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 8:32:45 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

We're past this, Bob

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 8:15:22 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Where's the beef?

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 7:32:54 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

If you were capable

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 5:38:02 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

I can try

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 5:06:41 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Evidence of what?

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 1:44:32 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Earth to Bob

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 11:33:20 AM

Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"

Anyone can debunk that garbage

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 8:30:31 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Not much for facts, are you?

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 6:55:48 AM

Article: "The NORAD Papers IV"

Easy

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 6:46:02 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Your FOURTH post on here,

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 6:39:52 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

An afterthought

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 6:26:21 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

You need to study it some more

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 5:33:54 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Admit it

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 8:39:09 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

OK, I'll bite

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 8:28:32 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Why don't you

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 8:16:26 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Phil Berg

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 8:08:38 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

So what?

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 7:19:53 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Leslie Robertson

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 6:34:39 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

AE911"truth"

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 6:29:38 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Your arguments are just getting sillier

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 5:51:04 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Your factual inaccuracies and faulty logic

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 5:01:25 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

What's your point?

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 2:14:35 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Hilarious

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 1:59:18 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Your hero, Rodriguez

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 1:48:19 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

My eyes tell me

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 11:30:35 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

One person?

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 11:14:50 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

When have you ever tried?

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 11:02:40 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Tipped off by the FDNY?

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 10:41:42 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

More suspicions

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 8:43:49 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

You have created your own rules, Cinderfella...

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 7:46:23 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

That's odd...

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 9:28:25 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Still waiting, Richard

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 8:00:05 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Photographic proof

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 7:40:05 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Instead of all of the name-calling and ad hominem,

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 6:03:35 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

You're easily amused

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 5:51:14 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Nonsense remark

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 5:44:45 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Two more things

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 1:48:52 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Psychic cop

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 1:43:03 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

They had FAA commercial pilot certificates

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 1:37:05 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Your "coincidence"

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 1:30:36 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

There have already been plenty of investigations

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 1:22:21 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

You finally got something right, Dave

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 9:13:47 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Why don't you stick to the issues?

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 7:45:05 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

re: Traitors

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 7:33:44 AM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Why do you want to ignore people who make sense?

Sunday, September 14, 2008 at 8:27:57 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

Proving it is no problem,

Sunday, September 14, 2008 at 6:03:46 PM

Article: "9/11-Last Man Out"

What a comedy of errors

Sunday, September 14, 2008 at 9:51:04 AM

Article: "The NORAD Papers IV"

Great article, Dean, but you didn't go far enough

Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 12:30:10 PM

Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"

Deja vu

Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 12:28:05 PM

Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"

Thanks for sharing

Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 11:46:45 AM

Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"

Job opportunity

Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 11:38:53 AM

Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"

What fallacy?

Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 11:34:15 AM

Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"

Here's a thought, Len

Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 11:22:32 AM

Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"

What "problem"?

Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 10:37:46 AM

Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"

Real dumb comment?

Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 9:51:11 AM

Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"

9/11 denial from the "truth movement"

Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 6:09:33 AM

Article: "High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's"

Why fool the editors?

Friday, September 12, 2008 at 10:55:50 PM

Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"

New demolition technique?

Friday, September 12, 2008 at 10:38:30 PM

Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"

This "troll"

Friday, September 12, 2008 at 10:28:15 PM

Article: "The GOP wants another 9/11 to boost John McCain"

Gee thanks, Bob

Saturday, July 5, 2008 at 11:08:31 AM

Correction to "Straw Men and Shaky Research"

Saturday, July 5, 2008 at 10:01:42 AM

No-Plane "Theory"

Friday, July 4, 2008 at 2:26:45 PM

Overkill

Friday, July 4, 2008 at 1:26:30 PM

Brain Damage?

Friday, July 4, 2008 at 12:17:03 PM

Straw Men and Shaky Research

Friday, July 4, 2008 at 9:13:58 AM

Diary: "Extra ENERGY in 9/11 buildings: Tell the Teacher"

Judy Wood

Friday, July 4, 2008 at 7:38:51 AM

Urban Legends

Friday, July 4, 2008 at 6:52:44 AM

Ample Evidence

Friday, July 4, 2008 at 6:04:59 AM

Take your own advice

Friday, July 4, 2008 at 5:27:51 AM

Planes flew at those speeds and at that altitude

Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 6:44:27 PM

Not too difficult if you try

Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 8:04:42 AM

First Things First

Wednesday, July 2, 2008 at 10:10:20 PM

Antidote

Wednesday, July 2, 2008 at 8:25:50 PM