Craig Ranke
Become a Fan.You'll get emails whenever I post articles on OpEdNews
www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com
OpEdNews Member for 198 week(s) and 6 day(s)
3 Articles, 0 Quick Links, 28 Comments, 4 Diaries, 0 Polls
28 Comments
Tuesday, November 8, 2011 at 1:25:23 PM
Diary : "9/11 Pentagon Debate: Craig Ranke (Cit) Vs Anthony Summers"
yes that is important as well....
Thursday, February 18, 2010 at 10:12:09 PM
Article : "Infiltrating the Truth Movement"
Richmond is part of the 9/11 myth cult
Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 1:05:55 PM
Diary : "Erik Larson's Methods vs Ed and Shinki Paik's Accounts - A R"
podcast address
Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 1:04:44 PM
Diary : "Erik Larson's Methods vs Dawn Vignola's account - A Rebuttal"
Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 1:01:42 PM
Diary : "Shinki and Ed Paik Accounts vs. CIT Methods"
rebuttal and debate challenge
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 at 4:06:45 PM
good questions
Tuesday, September 1, 2009 at 9:45:12 AM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
congress won't ask irrelevant deceptive questions...
Tuesday, September 1, 2009 at 2:01:39 AM
scroll up to the reply titled.....
Monday, August 31, 2009 at 2:20:06 AM
all pilots, experts, and even CIT detractors disagree
Sunday, August 30, 2009 at 3:01:11 PM
the witnesses are "fake"?
Sunday, August 30, 2009 at 2:59:34 PM
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 8:00:38 PM
you are exposing your own deceptive debate tactics
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 5:09:05 PM
so now the airport ISN'T right next door to the Pentagon??
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 2:47:24 PM
what's more accurate google earth or real earth?
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 2:37:33 PM
yes I did but your questions aren't germain to the evidence
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 12:35:05 PM
but there is no evidence for a missile.....
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 2:22:20 AM
ok fine Brian Good I'll answer all "nine" of your questions
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 12:00:12 AM
none of your "questions" are relevant since evidence proves:
Friday, August 28, 2009 at 8:22:27 PM
you haven't asked any relevant questions for me to reply to
Friday, August 28, 2009 at 9:10:06 AM
quite wrong
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 4:24:58 PM
Diary : "Is the 9/11 "Pentagon Hole" a Psyop to Distract from Real Qu"
personal attacks do not refute evidence
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 4:18:48 PM
don't tell me what I think or have done
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 3:50:33 PM
they are images.....
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 2:19:42 PM
Evidence is not opionion
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 11:56:10 AM
The entire premise of your argument is false
Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 1:32:38 PM
Article : "9/11: The Lack of Foundation Damage at the Pentagon is Irrec"
security video
Wednesday, April 23, 2008 at 4:26:30 PM
missile
Wednesday, April 23, 2008 at 4:17:45 PM
reply to Howard
28 Comments
Tuesday, November 8, 2011 at 1:25:23 PM
Diary : "9/11 Pentagon Debate: Craig Ranke (Cit) Vs Anthony Summers"
yes that is important as well....
Thursday, February 18, 2010 at 10:12:09 PM
Article : "Infiltrating the Truth Movement"
Richmond is part of the 9/11 myth cult
Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 1:05:55 PM
Diary : "Erik Larson's Methods vs Ed and Shinki Paik's Accounts - A R"
podcast address
Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 1:04:44 PM
Diary : "Erik Larson's Methods vs Dawn Vignola's account - A Rebuttal"
podcast address
Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 1:01:42 PM
Diary : "Shinki and Ed Paik Accounts vs. CIT Methods"
rebuttal and debate challenge
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 at 4:06:45 PM
Diary : "Erik Larson's Methods vs Dawn Vignola's account - A Rebuttal"
good questions
Tuesday, September 1, 2009 at 9:45:12 AM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
congress won't ask irrelevant deceptive questions...
Tuesday, September 1, 2009 at 2:01:39 AM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
scroll up to the reply titled.....
Monday, August 31, 2009 at 2:20:06 AM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
all pilots, experts, and even CIT detractors disagree
Sunday, August 30, 2009 at 3:01:11 PM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
the witnesses are "fake"?
Sunday, August 30, 2009 at 2:59:34 PM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
the witnesses are "fake"?
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 8:00:38 PM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
you are exposing your own deceptive debate tactics
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 5:09:05 PM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
so now the airport ISN'T right next door to the Pentagon??
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 2:47:24 PM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
what's more accurate google earth or real earth?
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 2:37:33 PM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
yes I did but your questions aren't germain to the evidence
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 12:35:05 PM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
but there is no evidence for a missile.....
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 2:22:20 AM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
ok fine Brian Good I'll answer all "nine" of your questions
Saturday, August 29, 2009 at 12:00:12 AM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
none of your "questions" are relevant since evidence proves:
Friday, August 28, 2009 at 8:22:27 PM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
you haven't asked any relevant questions for me to reply to
Friday, August 28, 2009 at 9:10:06 AM
Article : "INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMI"
quite wrong
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 4:24:58 PM
Diary : "Is the 9/11 "Pentagon Hole" a Psyop to Distract from Real Qu"
personal attacks do not refute evidence
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 4:18:48 PM
Diary : "Is the 9/11 "Pentagon Hole" a Psyop to Distract from Real Qu"
don't tell me what I think or have done
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 3:50:33 PM
Diary : "Is the 9/11 "Pentagon Hole" a Psyop to Distract from Real Qu"
they are images.....
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 2:19:42 PM
Diary : "Is the 9/11 "Pentagon Hole" a Psyop to Distract from Real Qu"
Evidence is not opionion
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 11:56:10 AM
Diary : "Is the 9/11 "Pentagon Hole" a Psyop to Distract from Real Qu"
The entire premise of your argument is false
Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 1:32:38 PM
Article : "9/11: The Lack of Foundation Damage at the Pentagon is Irrec"
security video
Wednesday, April 23, 2008 at 4:26:30 PM
Article : "9/11: The Lack of Foundation Damage at the Pentagon is Irrec"
missile
Wednesday, April 23, 2008 at 4:17:45 PM
Article : "9/11: The Lack of Foundation Damage at the Pentagon is Irrec"
reply to Howard