Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

RuGBYZHG

                 
Volunteer a little time and make a big difference

Become a Fan
Become a Fan.
You'll get emails whenever I post articles on OpEdNews

Assisting in the research of 9/11 since 2006. Only physical evidence observable through pictures or measurement data should be considered to determine what happened at all three sites. Hearsay and unsupported hypotheses must be dismissed and considered intentionally proffered to distract.

http://physicalevidenceof911.home.mchsi.com

OpEdNews Member for 383 week(s) and 6 day(s)

2 Articles, 0 Quick Links, 27 Comments, 1 Diaries, 0 Polls

Articles Listed By Date   List By Popularity

Monday, September 28, 2009     

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Propaganda vs. Projection: What is really the truth?
(11 comments) This article is in response to the September 15, 2009, article by Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration titled "Why Propaganda Trumps Truth".

Wednesday, March 12, 2008     

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

9/11 Qui Tam Jurisdictional Challenges Filed - 2/29/08
(9 comments) On February 29, 2008, a nearly complete set of opposition briefs and affidavits were filed in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, by the attorney for Dr. Judy Wood in the case entitled Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al. 1:07cv3314 (Hon. George B. Daniels, Judge). Follows Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel. USA vs. Science Applications International Corp. et al. 1:07cv4612.