OpEdNews.Com
So maybe Michael Moore's controversial documentary Fahrenheit 9/11
does preach to the choir. But as a member of the liberal Democratic
choir, I hope that Moore's movie can recruit some new members and change
the tune of some swing voters.
In amassing $22 million in its first weekend, Fahrenheit 9/11 has
already become the biggest grossing documentary of all time. What's
remarkable about the movie's success is that it isn't being widely
distributed--thus, block-long lines and sold-out theatres have been the
norm.
While skeptics might dismiss the phenomenon of the movie's success as
a result of publicity and controversy, there might be something deeper.
It's true that many people who are flocking to this movie are staunch
Bush-haters who have already formed their opinion of the current
administration. However, since the movie does show disturbing images
from the Iraq war and posed questions that the mainstream press shied
away from, it might make some people see things in a different light.
I saw the movie at a theatre in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, a small
suburb of Philadelphia. Jenkintown is located in a swing district in a
key battleground state. During the movie, people laughed at the portions
that portrayed Bush as a buffoon and applauded loudly after the movie.
There was stunned, attentive silence during most of the film,
especially during the portions where a mother talked about losing her
son who was killed in Iraq.
After the movie, there were several volunteers standing outside the
movie theatre registering people to vote.
Hopefully, this movie will serve as a rallying point to energize the
liberal base against Bush. There's also the chance that it might
convince a few independents and swing voters to vote for Kerry.
No doubt, the right wing attack dogs are out trashing Moore and his
film as unpatriotic, left-wing liberal lies and propaganda.
The film shows us many images that most Americans haven't seen, such
as severely wounded American soldiers with amputated limbs, bloody
battle scenes, as well as American soldiers and their families
questioning President Bush and the Iraq war. It also raises legitimate
issues about the Bush administration's ties to the Saudi government as
well as its decision to invade Iraq, given Bush administration
officials' statements before 9/11 that Iraq and Saddam Hussein did not
pose a threat to the United States. Moore's film also raises a
legitimate issue about the military's aggressive recruitment of
underprivileged teenagers, while only one member of Congress has a son
or daughter in the military.
John Kerry has been defined unjustifiably as a flip-flopper by Bush
campaign ads and conservative columnists and right-wing talk radio.
What Moore does through his movie is no different than what Rush
Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Charles Krauthammer do on a daily basis-
present and spin facts in a partisan manner.
Up until recently, President Bush has received a free ride from the
media, which served as patriotic flag wavers after 9/11 and in the
months leading up to the Iraq war. Moore's excoriation of Bush is no
different from the right wing media's lampooning of Kerry every day. If
the so called "liberal media" had raised the same issues that
Moore's movie raises, would we have launched this war against Iraq,
which had no weapons of mass destruction, no clear ties to al-Qaeda, and
no involvement in the September 11 attacks?
Would we have been silent while the administration conducted a
half-hearted effort to get Osama bin Laden and instead diverted
resources from Afghanistan to Iraq? Would we be more outspoken and
demand that more resources be put into homeland security?
To paraphrase a well-known Bushism shown in the movie--Bush fooled us
once, but he won't fool us again. It's unrealistic to expect Fahrenheit
9/11 to win too many fans in the Red states, but if Moore's movie can
convert 537 voters to pull the lever for Kerry, maybe it will make a
difference.
------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------
Larry Atkins, a lawyer and writer, has written over 200 Op-Eds,
articles, and essays for many publications, including the Atlanta
Journal Constitution, Baltimore Sun, Chicago Tribune, Christian Science
Monitor, Cleveland Plain Dealer, Dallas Morning News, Detroit News,
Indianapolis Star, Kansas City Star, Los Angeles Daily News, National
Public Radio (Commentaries for the national versions of Morning Edition
and Only a Game), Newsday, Philadelphia Inquirer and Inquirer Sunday
Magazine, San Francisco Chronicle, and Seattle Post-Intelligencer. He
teaches editorial writing as an adjunct professor at Temple University.
His e-mail address is larryLTatkins@aol.com
This article is copyrighted by Larry Atkins and originally appeared
in the Los Angeles Daily News.
Permission is granted to forward this or to place it on a website or
in print as long as the article is included intact, including this
statement.
Published in OpEdNews.com.