Since 2005, Scott Bloch, head of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), has been under investigation by the Inspector General of the White House Office of Personnel Management (OPM), at the behest of the President’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

The FBI raid was triggered by suspicion that Bloch may have destroyed computer records to obstruct justice, that he retaliated against whistleblowers who complained they were transferred out of Washington for political reasons because they disagreed with Bloch’s policies, and that he may have violated the Hatch Act, which forbids putting political pressure on career government employees. In the raid, FBI agents seized computers and records.

As OPM’s investigation moved forward, Bloch launched an investigation of the White House by combining several unrelated high-profile allegations, including last year’s firing of eight U.S. Attorneys, thousands of missing emails to and from former White House political advisor Karl Rove, and political briefings of General Services Administration managers, in violation of the Hatch Act.

The missing emails – also demanded by the U.S. Congress – are said to relate to Rove’s alleged involvement in the U.S. attorneys’ dismissals.

In yet another irony, the FBI raid on Bloch’s office and home came as Congress prepared to mark Washington Whistleblower Week, May 12-16, and on the sixth anniversary of the passage of the No FEAR Act in 2002. The act requires the government to compensate whistleblowers for judgments, awards, and settlements in equal employment opportunity (EEO) and whistleblower cases.

Bloch insists that the ‘forced removals’ were part of a reorganization that sent 12 career OSC employees to new assignments in other cities “to improve performance, not punish any employees.”

Bloch contends that one of the fired U.S. Attorneys, David Iglesias, suffered discriminatory treatment because of his 45-day absence for military service.

Public interest groups including Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) and the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) have charged that Bloch has irreconcilable conflicts of interest in his investigations of the White House.

Jeff Ruch, Executive Director PEER told us, "Scott Bloch gives opportunism a bad name."

“It makes no sense for Scott Bloch to investigate the White House while the White House investigates Bloch,” Ruch said, noting that Bloch has told allies that the White House has twice asked him to resign. Bloch can only be removed for cause. “

The 600 disclosure cases that Bloch has admitted were dismissed are all instances where civil servants came forward to report waste, fraud and abuse, yet OSC decided that there was no need to investigate," Ruch said.

He added, "Dismissing all 600 cases and deciding that not one deserved investigation -- because, in the words of the OSC spokesperson, they were all ‘minor matters or issues previously investigated’ -- stretches credulity."

POGO’s Director of Investigations, Beth Daley, said “It is not that Bloch has lacked the opportunities to conduct complex investigations since every virtually whistleblower in town goes to the OSC, but Bloch has ignored them all.  It is only when a probe serves his political agenda that he latches onto it as if it were the last helicopter leaving Saigon.”

“What we have here is a mutual investigation society. This is the bureaucratic equivalent of a mouse trying to swallow an elephant. The OSC has no standing to conduct the investigation and Scott Bloch cannot possibly investigate the White House while it is investigating him,” Daly declared.

"Bloch has yet to announce a single case where he has ordered an investigation into the employee's charges", PEER charges. The organization says, "in not one of these cases did Bloch's office affirmatively represent a whistleblower to obtain relief before the civil service court system", called the Merit Systems Protection Board.

 1  |  2