Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (26 comments)

John Conyers Confirms That An Attack Against Iran Is Not a "Conspiracy Theory"

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (9 fans)   -- Page 1 of 5 page(s)

opednews.com

On March 31st, we published an article entitled Russian Intelligence Services State US Is Preparing For Attack On Iran. We were not the first to break the story, and in fact, were behind the curve and found the story posted on the Digg Community. The article was well received, however, we noticed that it was being read by an enormous amount of state governmental agencies as well as a “who’s who” of federal entities - many of whom followed every link and spent a substantial amount of time reading, and then making return visits to the same article. It ls unconscionable that our Mainstream News Media hasn’t followed-up on and reported facts that indicate the United States is on a clear path to war with Iran:

On April the 2nd, and again on April the 5th, Russian sources reported the US was gong to strike Iran within two (2) weeks, yet not a word is mentioned on the MSM or in the Halls of Congress:

Russia ‘Alarmed’ As US Readies April Nuclear Attack On Iran

By News Director on April 5th, 2008

Russian Foreign Ministry Officials are reported to be ‘alarmed’ today over a ‘presentation’ made by the United States War Leaders to President Putin at this weeks NATO summit in Romania and which details the Americans plan to begin a nuclear attack against Iran’s atomic facilities in the next two weeks.

Most disturbing of these reports, according to Foreign Ministry Analysts, are the United States ‘offers and threats’ towards Russia to ‘remain neutral’ in this conflict or face the combined weight of the American and EU central banks deliberate collapsing of the Western banking system, and US dollar, and which is estimated will cause the loss of nearly $800 billion of Russian foreign reserves.

To the ‘offers’ presented to President Putin for keeping Russia out of this war, these reports continue, will be NATO’s rejection of Ukraine and Georgia membership into the Western Military Alliance and the ending of the planned US Missile Shield being planned for Poland and the Czech Republic. MUCH MORE

The same information was reported on April 2nd at “War In Iraq”

The story and allegations appeared to be credible, and since the MSM ignored the issue, we made this statement in a follow-up article, If We Go To War With Iran, Who Will You Blame? :

The MSM is concentrating on the upcoming November elections and the economy in the US - essentially using it as cover for failing to warn us of an impending attack against Iran. When we are faced with an issue that affects every American here and abroad, it’s time to bombard the MSM with emails, letters to the various editors, and calls to Congress to demand answers. On an issue this serious, the least the MSM could do is to try and debunk what is stated on the news in other countries - tell us why it’s not a problem, and assure us that our military isn’t readying themselves to attack Iran. If Russia is stating that they have evidence an attack on Iran is imminent, I believe that it is not only newsworthy, but to ignore a threat as dire as an attack that could be a precursor to WW III, if the MSM refuse to uphold their responsibility to warn the people, they are as guilty as those who make the final decision to begin the attack.

I expected an answer, either vague or an outright denial from the MSM or Congress itself, similar to the response Congress made when thousands of Americans jammed-up their phones in regard S 1959; with the substantiation that was offered on this issue, it’s fair to say many Americans were making calls and demanding answers, none which I expected until the pressure began to mount-up - and for the first time, I was actually shocked when exactly the opposite occurred:


Conyers: “If Bush Goes Into Iran, He Should Be Impeached”

By: Jane Hamsher Tuesday March 18, 2008 9:09 am

John Conyers just finished up a panel with John Cole and Christy Hardin Smith at Take Back America with words that were heartening to everyone made just a wee bit uneasy by the recent retirement of Admiral Fallon and the implications it might have for war with Iran:

“If Bush Goes Into Iran, He Should Be Impeached,” said Conyers. (Emphasis added.)

Conyers also said that with regard to FISA, the House was going into conference with the Senate. That the Senate wanted to give retroactive immunity to the telecoms, and that the House is saying “let a judge decide.” But he also made the point that it wasn’t just the Republicans who were the problem: LINK

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

http://thepoliticalbandit.com/

I am nothing more than a patriotic American that is doing whatever I can to further the cause of democracy, the rule of law, and am extremely concerned in regard the slow creep of "soft fascism" that has been destroying America's middle-class. I (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
26 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

John Conyers: Aiding and abetting Bush's crimes by Frank J. Ranelli on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:50:36 PM
I agree... by Professor Fandel on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:19:30 PM
Conyers has more than enough evidence of High Crimes and by Susan Nelsen on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:58:10 PM
This happens you can hang it up ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:41:23 PM
You said it very well, Mr. M. by richard on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:48:59 PM
Appeasement Didn't Work With Hitler... by Richard Volaar on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:48:37 PM
Theres a plus to all this by john riggs on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:47:04 PM
Murder by Roger on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:12:46 PM
The Writer Spells out our Predicament by ronheri on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:44:42 PM
perhaps by richard on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:01:23 PM
i agree with roger by TRADESMAN on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:58:48 PM
Would the Bu$h cabal want to spoil his daughter's by Stanimal on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:12:26 PM
So what's he going to do about it? by coyote on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:35:04 PM
Iran by shirley reese on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:38:43 PM
What IS wrong With The Congress? by William Cormier on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:41:35 PM
Unlike Iraq by Mr M on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:54:12 PM
PUBLICLY HUMLATED by RICHARD SHADE on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:22:20 AM
80% of Americans are Fed Up by ronheri on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:03:27 PM
AN attack against Iran by vincent passiatore on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:12:09 AM
Holy Cow Batman! by pft on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:02:37 AM
Very good points by richard on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:30:52 AM
It's All In Perception Robin! by William Cormier on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:11:42 AM
Exaggeration by Niloufar Parsi on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:25:39 AM
What have I missed here? by Jim Freeman on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:54:35 AM
Without the MSM Reporting on The Issue, Who Knows? by William Cormier on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:50:01 PM
Attack by Archie on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:22:08 PM