OpEdNews Op Eds

When The Media Grew Ears: ABC

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

The American media has discovered that Ron Paul has something to say, knows his facts, and is able to offer a cogent defense of his political positions. Most of the other candidates have had ample opportunities to respond to questions in an open interview format, but those have been rare and brief segments for Ron Paul. It seems that some media outlets have grown ears and are now ready to listen.

ABC News’ John Stossel has always had libertarian inclinations – they’re evident in his 20/20 segments and specials. This week, he sat down with Ron Paul to discuss a host of issues ... and allowed him to offer complete responses to each question. The interview is posted on the web and will likely be broadcast at an opportune moment. The chat between “Two Libertarians”, is offered in six segments:
  • Freedom of Choice
    Stossel
    : You would legalize marijuana, cocaine, heroin?
    Paul: I would get the government out of regulating all those substances and allow the states to deal with the problems: whether children should have them; whether children can buy cigarettes and alcohol, or hard drugs, marijuana, and different states would probably do different things.
    … Governments can't protect individuals from themselves, it’s just impossible. Otherwise, they become a tyrannical state.

  • The Role of Government
    Stossel: What should government do?
    Paul: Protect our freedoms; have a strong national defense; take care of our borders; have a sound currency.
    … These problems can be solved with a lot less government.

  • Foreign Policy
    Stossel: You say ‘we should have no world policeman.’ The world doesn’t need a policeman?
    Paul: It’s O.K. for us to have a responsibility personally to help other people. If we didn’t have an income tax, you would have more money, and you could help as many people as you wanted.
    … In defense, I don’t think there’s every a moral justification to start the war.

  • Immigration
    Stossel
    : You want a 700-mile fence between our border and Mexico?
    Paul: Not really. There was an immigration bill that had a fence in it – to attack amnesty. I don’t like amnesty, so I voted for that bill to stop the amnesty, but I didn’t think the fence can solve our problems.
    … You subsidize illegal immigration, you’re going get more of it.

  • Health Care
    Stossel:
    Is the answer more government, more protection?
    Paul: Some people are arguing that, and of course, I take the position that government interferes too often, we become complacent and depend on the government to protect us, and they fail, and they don’t provide the services they claim.
    … I don't want to run your life. I don’t want to run the economy. I don’t want to police the world.


  • Constitutional Freedoms
    Stossel: You talk about freedom and tyranny. I seldom hear politicians use those words.
    Paul: That’s right. I think those are our only two choices and we’ve had a grand experiment in this country, where we emphasize freedom. If you read the constitution, the constitution was designed to protect individual liberty, to restrain the government.
    … Freedom is new. Tyranny is old … it’s ancient.

This is a fun interview. All of Stossel’s questions are “softballs” or tongue-in-cheek,  but he leaves the time open for Paul to respond with full thoughts and explanations. That’s a welcome relief from the interviews that toss out spurious allegations or frivolous charges, giving Paul only a few meager seconds to answer. You get the impression that Ron Paul really is a serious candidate, who can win.

Paul has more time to talk here than in all of the broadcast “debates” combined. Rarely has he been granted more than two minutes out of a frivolous two-hour exchange where “plain talk” had better be a thirty second sound bite.

 

www.westmiller.com/comment/

Political commentary and activism for five decades. National Chairman, Republican Liberty Caucus www.rlc.org Previous: RLC Secretary, California Chairman 1998 Candidate for Congress, California 24th CD Libertarian Party National Secretary, (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ron Paul Blimp Soars Over BiCRA

Mitt Romney's Fall From Grace

When The Media Grew Ears: ABC

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

ron paul is not a great choice as leader.  hi... by tanya on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 10:26:02 AM
Tanya: Ron Paul is a Dangerous IdeaThat may or may... by William Westmiller on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 2:36:18 PM
This nation needs a recalibration or it will be so... by Larry Wainwright on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 10:53:23 AM
From what I have seen and heard about Ron Paul ~ i... by tabonsell on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 3:58:49 PM
You offer your impressions, which aren't based... by William Westmiller on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 4:19:59 PM
Hi All, We all hear about Ron Paul's posi... by Louis Nardozi on Sunday, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:32:28 PM
Malignant usurpation and supreme belligerance.&nbs... by Tim Riley on Tuesday, Dec 18, 2007 at 4:49:58 PM