Tags for This Article:

Truth (1660)  9 11 WTC Attack (509)  Al Qaeda (243)  People Osama Bin Laden (115)  Treason US (99) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
February 10, 2007 at 15:58:01

View Ratings | Rate It

Are Bush & bin Laden joined at the hip?

by W. Christopher Epler     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

Are Bush & bin Laden joined at the hip?

**********************************************************************
Let's face it, there's something treacherously suspicious about the Bush & bin Laden relationship. Apart from Bush's blunder (?) which allowed bin Laden to escape from Afghanistan, there are tons of unanswered questions here.



For example, just why did Bush fly plane loads of bin Laden's relatives out of our country a mere few hours after 9/11?

And speaking of 9/11, we should never forget that Bush was in the political toilet before the 9/11 catastrophe. And then, thanks to Bin Laden and 9/11, president pinhead suddenly became a cardboard patriotic figure.

And just how difficult can it be to run down ONE MAN in going on seven years with the state of the art intelligence capabilities and nearly limitless fire power of our country?

And it's international common knowledge that the Bush Royal Family and the Saudi Royal Family are simply two sides of the same coin.

And everyone agrees that Osama's antics have been the prime rationalization for the Likudnik lobby's neocon juggernaut during the last several years.

And even barnyard animals understood that Bin Laden's "photo op" right before the 2004 Presidential election probably helped Bush to steal the election more than anything else. Always nice to have friends, isn't it?

So just what is this incestuous marriage between these two men?

At least, unlike Judas Joe Lieberman, we don't have any pictures of Bush giving bin Laden a big, smacking kiss.
**********************************************************************
W. Christopher Epler

more op-eds, poems, essays, and fiction from Bill at

The Liberation of Realism

 

www.theliberationofrealism.blogspot.com

A liberal American, PhD mathematician, bipedal Earthling.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments


Michael Weaver-Robbins

The answer is YES

I am ceaselessly amazed at the ability of the American public to fail to remember what happened, figuratively, yesterday.

The Republican leadership was openly talking of dumping Bush within less than a year following Bush's election due to his dimwitted policies on the economy which had turned a national surplus into a record deficit. This deficit Bush later blamed on 'failed' policies of the Clinton administration...yeah right. This all was BEFORE 9/11/2001 which Bush tends to blame for our economic woes in that we have run up the deficit and the national debt to an amazing all-time record level paying to fight what was once called the "War on Terror". Well, bull manure George.

The whole 9/11 scenario is beginning to smell to high heaven. It certainly happened, and it happened at a convenient time for this ignorant, arrogant, spoiled and dangerous mental midget from Crawford, TX don't you think? Several experts on explosive demolition have stated on the record that the Twin Towers falling had every earmark of controlled explosive demolition. These same experts have stated that the explanations offered by Administration 'experts' for the "failure" of the Towers' structures cannot be believed. The physics involved just do not add up. I wonder why this information never got into the 9/11 Commission Report. I do not know for certain what happened and neither do 99% of Americans. Most just 'know' what they have been told by the government. I for one believe almost nothing that our government tells me any more.

Yes, why indeed is no one really investigating the Crawford, TX Village Idiot's having multiple members of Bin Laden's family flown out of the US right after 9/11 when no other flights were being allowed in the US?

When is it going to occur to someone to ask why, if Iraq had ANYTHING to do with 9/11, were all but one of the 'hijackers' accused of the 9/11 attacks all Saudi citizens?

The Saudi royals are thoroughly insulated by their long-standing personal relationship with the Bush family (George Herbert Walker Bush is one of the corporatists' champions of the so-called New World Order in which we will be expected to toil to further enrich the top 2% of all Americans-while struggling to live ourselves) from answering for their role in the current state of Middle Eastern affairs.

These things along with the reported "blunder" that allowed Bin Laden to escape Afghanistan all cry out to have the current occupant of the Oval Office to stand to answer for them.

I personally do not believe that there has ever been a meaningful search for Osama Bin Laden. If there has been, the failure to find and kill him would be yet another manifestation of the complete ineptitude and incompetence of Bush and his Neocon thugs.

Impeachment...

It will never happen. The mainstream media is all owned and controlled by the corporate/fascist powers who pull GW Bush's strings and call the tunes that he dances to so willingly. Our Congress, with a few notable exceptions of course, is riddled with corruption. The source of that corruption is ubiquitous lobbyist that slithers up and down the halls of the House and Senate providing "expert assistance in crafting legislation" along with MONEY and graft of other sorts (a la Randy "Duke Cunningham R-CA) by the truck load to our elected representatives through various means. We cannot reasonably expect a successful impeachment and conviction of Bush and Cheney under these circumstances.

by Michael Weaver-Robbins (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 30 comments) on Thursday, February 15, 2007 at 4:03:51 AM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

End of the Road to Moronity by Rand Clifford

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

Leading lives of quiet desperation this holiday season by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis

For the GOP, the Economic Meltdown May Have Happened Just a Wee Bit Early by Bernard Weiner

Go To Top 50 Most Popular