![]() |
|
|
June 16, 2007 at 07:19:24
by Uri Avnery Page 1 of 3 page(s) |
|
|
Some months ago, I described this situation as a sociological experiment set up by Israel, the United States and the European Union. The population of the Gaza Strip as guinea pigs.
This week, the experiment showed results. They proved that human beings react exactly like other animals: when too many of them are crowded into a small area in miserable conditions, they become aggressive, and even murderous. The organizers of the experiment in Jerusalem, Washington, Berlin, Oslo, Ottawa and other capitals could rub their hands in satisfaction. The subjects of the experiment reacted as foreseen. Many of them even died in the interests of science.
But the experiment is not yet over. The scientists want to know what happens if the blockade is tightened still further.
WHAT HAS caused the present explosion in the Gaza Strip?
The timing of Hamas' decision to take over the Strip by force was not accidental. Hamas had many good reasons to avoid it. The organization is unable to feed the population. It has no interest in provoking the Egyptian regime, which is busy fighting the Muslim Brotherhood, the mother-organization of Hamas. Also, the organization has no interest in providing Israel with a pretext for tightening the blockade.
But the Hamas leaders decided that they had no alternative but to destroy the armed organizations that are tied to Fatah and take their orders from President Mahmoud Abbas. The US has ordered Israel to supply these organizations with large quantities of weapons, in order to enable them to fight Hamas. The Israeli army chiefs did not like the idea, fearing that the arms might end up in the hands of Hamas (as is actually happening now). But our government obeyed American orders, as usual.
The American aim is clear. President Bush has chosen a local leader for every Muslim country, who will rule it under American protection and follow American orders. In Iraq, in Lebanon, in Afghanistan, and also in Palestine.
Hamas believes that the man marked for this job in Gaza is Mohammed Dahlan. For years it has looked as if he was being groomed for this position. The American and Israeli media have been singing his praises, describing him as a strong, determined leader, "moderate" (i.e. obedient to American orders) and "pragmatic" (i.e. obedient to Israeli orders). And the more the Americans and Israelis lauded Dahlan, the more they undermined his standing among the Palestinians. Especially as Dahlan was away in Cairo, as if waiting for his men to receive the promised arms.
In the eyes of Hamas, the attack on the Fatah strongholds in the Gaza Strip is a preventive war. The organizations of Abbas and Dahlan melted like snow in the Palestinian sun. Hamas has easily taken over the whole Gaza Strip.
How could the American and Israeli generals miscalculate so badly? They are able to think only in strictly military terms: so-and-so many soldiers, so-and-so many machine guns. But in interior struggles in particular, quantitative calculations are secondary. The morale of the fighters and public sentiment are far more important. The members of the Fatah organizations do not know what they are fighting for. The Gaza population supports Hamas, because they believe that it is fighting the Israeli occupier. Their opponents look like collaborators of the occupation. The American statements about their intention of arming them with Israeli weapons have finally condemned them.
That is not a matter of Islamic fundamentalism. In this respect all nations are the same: they hate collaborators of a foreign occupier, whether they are Norwegian (Quisling), French (Petain) or Palestinian.
IN WASHINGTON and Jerusalem, politicians are bemoaning the "weakness of Mahmoud Abbas".
They see now that the only person who could prevent anarchy in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank was Yasser Arafat. He had a natural authority. The masses adored him. Even his adversaries, like Hamas, respected him. He created several security apparatuses that competed with each other, in order to prevent any single apparatus from carrying out a coup-d'etat. Arafat was able to negotiate, sign a peace agreement and get his people to accept it.
But Arafat was pilloried by Israel as a monster, imprisoned in the Mukata'ah and, in the end, murdered. The Palestinian public elected Mahmoud Abbas as his successor, hoping that he would get from the Americans and the Israelis what they had refused to give to Arafat.
If the leaders in Washington and Jerusalem had indeed been interested in peace, they would have hastened to sign a peace agreement with Abbas, who had declared that he was ready to accept the same far-reaching compromise as Arafat. The Americans and the Israelis heaped on him all conceivable praise and rebuffed him on every concrete issue.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 9 comments |
|
no mistake
America supplying arms to the Palastinians was no mistake in judgement they knew exactly what would happen.With the Palastinians busy killing each other it solves 2 problems,one it gets rid of many more Palastians and two it keeps them busy so they are not planning attacks on Israel and Israel doesn"t have the pressure to actually pretend to be negotiating to solve the Palastinian problem they have created.Its a win win situation for America and the Jews. by liberalsrock (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 256 comments [53 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Jun 16, 2007 at 8:23:51 AM
|
|
Tears and Fears
I wonder if 'civilized' men will ever put their guns down and wake up and see what they are doing to the children. I know it can ONLY happen when there is a transformation of heart and minds to see NOT stereotypes and "the other" but that ALL are sacred human beings and we must learn to share this world as equals. I became Personally involved in the Palestinian Israeli issue the second I viewed a photo of a little boy in Bethlehem, named George of Beit Jala [west Bethlehem] who graces the WAWA Banner. http://www.wearewideawake.org In 2000, George was 'captured' by photographer Debbie Hill, the morning after the Israeli army destroyed his bedroom in retaliation for a few hopeless militants who had infiltrated his once peaceful Christian village to snipe across the way into the illegal colony of Gilo. The shrapnel that pierced the wall of his sanctuary read "Made in USA" and was delivered via American made Apache helicopters. The second I saw George's eyes, my heart said "DO SOMETHING!" What I have done is travel four times in the last two years to OPT [and I am returning for a 5th in July] to bear witness and report the facts on the ground the USA government and media ignores: THE CHILDREN! The only way I can endure the visceral pain of being in occupied territory is because of my faith and the solidarity and good works of truth telling Israelis and NONVIOLENT Palestinians and Internationals who seek justice for the least, which is the only way to achieve security and peace for anyone. But, it seems that FEAR has taken the upper hand, for it drives the economies of empire. " the state of constant fear that creates a bottomless global demand for devices that watch, listen, contain and target "suspects." "And fear, it turns out, is the ultimate renewable resource."- http://www.thenation.com/ "You shall know the truth and the truth will set you free."-John 8:32 My faith tells me that whatever I do or do NOT do for the least and outcast, I do it or NOT do it unto God. Will 'civilized' man ever WAKE UP and see what they are teaching and doing to the "least" among us: The children! by Eileen Fleming (172 articles, 101 quicklinks, 274 diaries, 650 comments [16 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Jun 16, 2007 at 9:17:31 AM
|
|
Wake up!
As to be expected you bleeding heart progressives have picked the wrong side of the Arab/Israeli conflict. So that you to can be historically accrete you need to watch this HERE and after you see that you have been totally wrong about the conflict and in fact embodied the terrorists (as usual) you will need to accept the fact that your unable to understand the world political reality, with your cum ba la/group think, goggles on. Ooh, this is the funniest thing I have read in weeks. Hamas and looters raid Arafat's home, steal his Nobel Peace Prize. Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, stop it your killing me! The religion of peace blows the front door off Arafat’s house and ransacks it including the peace prize. This is after spending the week tossing people off the tallest building they could find in Gaza. Dragging others to there death behind there cars. Killing all that oppose them and then when carnage seems to be slowing down, as a cake topper to show the world that yes we can sink lower, steal the peace prize. Ha, Ha, Ha! But that’s not all folks. Hamas also stated that fanatical Islam is to be practiced by all in Gaza. Any one that is gay will be shot dead; any woman that doesn’t wear the proper wraps will be killed. Any man that doesn’t wear a beard will be killed. Anyone that wants to practice a non Islamic religion will be killed. All seculars and atheists will be killed. And last but not least anyone that disagrees with Hamas will be killed. And you progressives are on there side? Your stupidity is suicidal for what you say you believe in. In closing let me say that I’m not laughing with you, I’m laughing at you. Ha, Ha, Ha! by David C Beach (0 articles, 1 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 169 comments) on Sunday, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:55:49 AM
|
|
Reply: You are laughing
because you are being a heartless idiot. There is nothing at all funny about the situation! You say in your bio "I hate trolls and strive not to be one." You have failed utterly with your mocking post. by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 997 comments) on Sunday, Jun 17, 2007 at 1:58:30 AM
|
|
Reply: I absolutly am laughing
What’s funny is that the religion of peace produces most of the active terrorists, murderers and thugs in the world mostly financed and armed by Iran. What’s funny are liberals and socialists embracing a theology that if successful will kill you all. And states in no uncertain terms that you are the enemy! What’s not funny about a religion of PEACE looting a PEACE prize? I guess its funny to me because I don’t believe the Palestinians are anything other than pawns being played by the thugdoms of the Middle East to there own ends. I don’t respect the so called Palestinians because they produce though there actions and inactions the living conditions they then b*tch about continually. I have no respect for parents sending there kids out to explode or men that hide behind woman, children and masks. The Israelis are the most tolerant people on this earth putting up with 50 years of 12 Th century ignorance and terror from all that surround them. I think it’s sad that though your passivity and misplaced compassion you encourage and embolden very bad people to be even worse as played out in Gaza last week. I think it’s funny every time you have to make new excuses and exceptions to be “understanding” of the inhumanity of their fanaticism/ignorance. by David C Beach (0 articles, 1 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 169 comments) on Sunday, Jun 17, 2007 at 6:05:18 AM
|
|
Reply: explain that to the
"Prince of Peace", and ask him about the Christian Crusades, while you are at it -- if you meet him. It's painful for me to even think about the level of your ignorance. by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 997 comments) on Sunday, Jun 17, 2007 at 5:42:04 PM
|
|
Reply: "Prince of Peace" -- Tenth Century Crusades- what logic?
Blue Pilgrim, Where in the world did your asinine statement, "Ask the Prince of Peace," come from? "War" never aluded to Jesus Christ! As far as you and I know, he is not a Chrisitian. Where in the world is there any context about the "Tenth Century Crusades?" He has not mentioned Christianity in any context at all. Your illogic is amazing. Do you always go to such extraordinary means to attack Christianity no matter the context? by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 972 comments) on Monday, Jun 18, 2007 at 4:20:46 PM
|
|
Reply: the point
Is that to call Islam is not a relgion of peace ignores the violence of members of any religion. Sorry you didn't get the drift of that. by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 997 comments) on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 6:15:36 PM
|
|
Einstein,Buber,Fromm Envisaged a peaceful ONE State Solution
For all the wishful thinking and compassion of those who would like to see peace for everyone (and eventual prosperous conditions for Arab Palestinians), clarity is missing. by Jay Janson (105 articles, 0 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 117 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:40:51 AM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |