Tags for This Article:

Torture (668)  People Rumsfeld Donald (174)  Abu Ghraib (101) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
June 19, 2007 at 14:20:08

Taguba, Torture, And Abu Ghraib

by Todd Huffman, M.D.     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

"Among the corrosive lies a nation at war tells itself is that the glory - the lofty goals announced beforehand, the victories, the liberation of the oppressed - belongs to the country as a whole; but the failure - the accidents, the unaccounted civilian dead, the crimes and the atrocities - is always exceptional."

In the days after a shocked world beheld the vacation pictures of depraved American soldiers enjoying their stay at Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad, where Saddam Hussein too enjoyed torturing innocent Iraqis, Phillip Kennicott of the Washington Post wrote these poignant words. Americans, though by and large horrified by these scenes, were resting their collective conscience assured by the President that these reprehensible acts were the handiwork of no more than “a few bad apples”, and not representative of the overall U.S policy toward the treatment of prisoners.



Kennicott’s was a lonely voice we didn’t and still do not want to hear. Americans do not but must believe, as he said further, that "great national crimes begin with acts of misguided individuals; and no matter how many people are held directly accountable for these crimes, we are, collectively, responsible for what these individuals have done. We live in a democracy. Every errant smart bomb, every dead civilian, every sodomized prisoner, is ours."

Multiple Pentagon investigations into the abuses committed at Abu Ghraib have each provided final explanations, and resulted in punishments for those smiling soldiers. Yet each investigation has failed to punish anyone outside Abu Ghraib, even as the independent panel investigating the abuses, chaired by former Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger, criticized the Pentagon’s civilian leadership up the chain-of-command to and including then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

Even now, well into 2007, there are continuing revelations of torture, murder, and maltreatment of detainees and corpses in Guantanamo
, Iraq and Afghanistan, and in secret CIA prisons in Poland and Romania.  And this week comes the latest. In the June 25th issue of the New Yorker magazine (http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/06/25/070625fa_fact_hersh?print), veteran reporter and thorn in the administration’s side Seymour Hersh details how Army Major General Antonio Taguba, who investigated the Abu Ghraib scandal, became one of its casualties. It makes for solemn reading as to how blatantly those in the administration, including the president himself, have lied when telling the American public time and again that they do not support torture.

Torture makes no moral or common sense. No matter how certain their guilt, torturing prisoners blurs the line between us and those we claim as our enemies. In torturing prisoners, we become what we are fighting against.

There are practical arguments as well against the use of torture: Torture does not produce reliable intelligence; torture of detainees held by the U.S. hands our enemies a dangerous excuse to torture our soldiers when they are captured; and torture’s negative impact on America’s reputation and security undermines the larger “war” against terrorism.

But that there would even be debate over torture begs the question of who we are, of what we have become. The rule of law both secular and heavenly makes plain that cruel and inhuman punishment is beneath the dignity of men and nations. Did our dignity collapse in the rubble of the twin towers?

Why would anyone want to defend torture ever? Torture is an unqualified evil that stains our souls. Torments inflicted on body and mind violate the intrinsic dignity and worth of the human being, and erode the character of the nation that tortures.

Moreover, how is it that those who profess to walk with God and speak his wishes condone or even authorize the harm of a human life believed made in his image? Jesus was tortured on the cross by the Roman Empire. How can any Christian support any kind of torture?

Torture is always wrong. Always. It is impermissible in all circumstances. Yes, this is moral absolutism. When it comes to torture, moral relativism leads us into the caves of our purported enemies, where we'll end up meeting ourselves.

Authorizing torture trusts government simply too much. As Mr. Kennicott reminded us, we live in a democracy, and every tortured prisoner is ours. 

 

www.strangeanimals.us

Todd Huffman is a pediatrician and writer living in Eugene, Oregon. He is a regular contributor to many newspapers and publications throughout the Pacific Northwest.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

Bush has made us a nation of Shame.

Thank you for stating clearly what we all know. We need to hear it bannered in the WP, NYT, LATimes, Dallas Morning News, and featured even on news releases.

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 940 comments) on Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 11:08:49 AM
 


Margaret Bassett is an 86-year old, currently living in senior housing, with a lifelong interest in political conumbrums. She hopes to hold out for one more presidential election. Bachelors from State University of Iowa (1944) and Masters from Roosevelt University (1975) help to unravel important requirements for modern communication. Early introduction to computer science (1966) trumps them. It's payback time. She's been "entitled" so long she hopes to find some good coming off the keyboa...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Margaret BassettMargaret Bassett is an 86-year old, currently living in senior housing, with a lifelong interest in political conumbrums. She hopes to hold out for one more presidential election. Bachelors from State University of Iowa (1944) and Masters from Roosevelt University (1975) help to unravel important requirements for modern communication. Early introduction to computer science (1966) trumps them. It's payback time. She's been "entitled" so long she hopes to find some good coming off the keyboa...

to see more of bio, click on member name

I read the Taguba story and started thinking

back to the robust beginning of a volunteer (professional) army. As disastrous as the Viet Nam war was, at least there was a benchmark for what is expected of a citizen soldier. So after the Church committee, we got our FISA and general acknowledgment of FBI and DOD overkill in the Intelligence Department. But what also transpired was the virtual cessation of the draft (officially not dead at this writing as far as I know). It was quixotic for Charlie Rangel to bring up the draft during the days when Falluja,et al, were playing out. However, he made his point. That the poor send their sons and daughters to battle. John Kerry's "joke" about acing exams or going to the Army was pungent because it pointed to the same demographics as Rangel's proposal.

So it is much less worrisome to me now, than it was in the 70's, that the military might become a uber-institution with political power. Touches of the thought came up during Wes Clark's short run for the presidency. Not very threatening, it appeared. In the current war, I think more of India during the days of the British Empire where the native fighters were used for real tasks and the British officers were the overseers.

Only in Iraq, the tables are turned. The American enlisted personnel are on slogging detail, although they have in fact been trained for much more, and the real beneficiaries, money wise, are truly outsourced from Halliburton and others at much higher rates of pay. To me it was a shock that to keep US enlistment steady it was necessary to give bonuses for reenlistment. I don't think that was the intention of Congress when they changed the law.

Obviously, accountability to the nation suffers. Financially, we have lost the ability to know where the money is coming from. The poor young enlistee is suckered in to a system where a little upfront money is dangled in front of his eyes and he is lucky for advancement. That, to me, lacks a mark of professionalism. Accountability to the civilian leadership of the nation is a very serious concern. The outsourced personnel is not obliged to honor respect for the political values of a nation which pays them.

Perhaps Taguba and others like him can benefit from bitter experience for the sake of the American system of military protection. Whether the answer is a frank discussion in the political realm, or whether there is a core in military colleges which can turn the corruption around--that is hard to answer.

by Margaret Bassett (19 articles, 1263 quicklinks, 26 diaries, 742 comments) on Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 8:32:55 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
(Most forwarded)

Are you ready for nuclear war? by Paul Craig Roberts

Loserville: Obama Is Channeling Kerry and Gore by Dave Lindorff

Fresh New Discovery - Can You Guess What This Photo Is? by Meryl Ann Butler

NSA MAY BE READING WINDOWS SOFTWARE IN YOUR COMPUTER by Sherwood Ross

"Caroline: Pull a Cheney!" An Open Letter to Caroline Kennedy (head of the Obama VP search team) by Michael Moore

Mr. Bill: "OH NO, Fix the coast you broke, Shell Oil!" by Georgianne Nienaber

The REAL John McCain by Mike Kuykendall

Pelosi Gets "Booked" & Confronts Her Own Past by Linda Milazzo

The Urgency of Impeachment by Jeeni Criscenzo

New Zogby/Reuters Poll: Obama Down 5, in an Almost Perfect Storm by Rob Kall

24 hrs 48 hrs
72 hrs 1 week
1 month 6 months
1 year All Time
Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls