Tags for This Article:

Terrorists-Terrorism (998)  Humor (327)  Double Standards (94)  Kindness (58) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 14, 2007 at 08:40:24

The REAL Domestic Terrorism Threats

by Todd Huffman, M.D.     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Every day brings fresh news of international terrorism. Television brings us face to face with violence across the world: suicide bombings, car bombings, improvised explosive devices, pipeline sabotage, hostage taking, mass executions, and wanton genocide.

Newspapers force us to suffer our imagination. Both fill us with a headline-induced anxiety and a fear of things that will almost certainly never affect us personally.  

But why does no one cover the terrorism that does affect us personally, that exists in our daily lives, and is steadily on the rise? You know the terrorism I’m talking about, the kind perpetrated by a certain type of person with a certain type of personality, known as the ‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ personality.

I don’t know about you, but quite frankly Osama bin Laden brings far less fear into my everyday life than do ‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ people.  

‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ people are running rampant in our country and wreaking havoc everywhere they go. While most of us follow the rules, these people seem to believe that there’s an exception for every rule, and by the grace of God they are it.

As a group, these people are responsible for more rudeness, more bad behavior, and more terror than any group in America, and my feeling is that if politicians in Washington want to protect me from anyone, I want it to be these people. The first one who says he or she will gets my vote. 

‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ people are not hard to find. Their favorite place to terrorize is on the road. ‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ people are the ones driving through the red light at every intersection. Dear reader, you know this is no exaggeration. It’s the rare intersection anymore where no one brazenly runs the red. What was once a cause for exclaiming to your passenger “Wow! Did you see that guy? He just ran a red light!” is now the norm, not worthy of anything more than yet another wistful shake of the head at the sad state of our world today.  

So expected is it, in fact, that a ‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ person will run the red light that most of us know not to heed the urging of the green light to “go” until the yellow light is almost turned, to the ire of fifty drivers waiting behind us. Except, of course, for those ‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ people back there who plan on going through the intersection anyway, no matter what color the light. 

‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ people are also the ones who pull out or merge into oncoming traffic no matter how fast or how nonexistent the space to accommodate them, and no matter how many pedestrians or bicyclists are in the crosswalk. “I frankly don’t care if my action causes a chain reaction that endangers the lives and limbs of dozens of you rule-abiding people. You WILL make room for ME!” the ‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ person thinks.

He knows it’ll be the guy two cars back that gets ticketed, for rear-ending the guy in front of him who slammed on his brakes to avoid rear-ending the ‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ person, who is already home and walking his dog and letting it poop in the neighbor’s yard by the time the police reach the scene of the accident. 

And what happens when you glare or honk your horn at them for endangering your life? The ‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ person becomes quite indignant, even angry. If you’re lucky, they’ll only just flip you off. If you’re not, you might become a victim of road rage, of Terror on the American Road. The threat of road rage to you and me is so high nowadays that I think the Homeland Security Department should raise its Homeland Threat Level to orange.

Raising it to red won’t work - the ‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ people will just ignore it. 

‘Rules Don’t Apply To Me’ people are more than just dangerous on the road, they’re a rude presence just about everywhere we go. The rules clearly do not apply anywhere to these people, as they share every word of their private lives with us while talking on their cel phones during the movie and in the restaurant.

Or, as they stall the express line at the grocery store with at least fifteen items more than the fifteen items or less clearly stated in big, easy-to-read letters on the sign above the fifteen year-old cashier too timid to enforce it.

Or, as they struggle and fail to lift into the overhead bin their over-sized, over-stuffed carry-on bag while the rest of us claustrophobically wait in the aisle, hoping to take off before the end of our vacation.

Or, worst of all, as they lead the country. 

 1  |  2

 

www.strangeanimals.us

Todd Huffman is a pediatrician and writer living in Eugene, Oregon. He is a regular contributor to many newspapers and publications throughout the Pacific Northwest.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

Former Lawyer, current Business Consultant,history buff, Christian, father of 2 sons and a supporter of democratic government.
ArchieFormer Lawyer, current Business Consultant,history buff, Christian, father of 2 sons and a supporter of democratic government.

Real

There are people like that everywhere but the worst are the rich ones. look at Paris Hilton, but she got her comeuppance. What about the former owner of the Plaza Hotel in New York. She believed that only ordinary people should have to pay taxes not her but of course she also ended up wearing stripes. So although many get away with this character flaw others don't. We just have to work to lower the number of don'ts.

by Archie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1087 comments) on Thursday, June 14, 2007 at 10:27:48 AM
 


The author a human who has made a important discovery."I'm just happy to be here..."  
RoageThe author a human who has made a important discovery."I'm just happy to be here..."  

The rules do not apply to me!

I never signed up to be a slave or a practice dummy for others who  ignorantly believe they are my master. I nor, anyone else in this country, the Republic that is, need shills forcing us or tricking us to comply with their devious perverted order. I do not have the opportunity to trade in monet that has real value and the land of my birth has been overun by foreign occupiers looting me of my birthright. I am forced to labor for money in which I am unable to lawfully transfer ownership of property. What is needed in my country is not more mindless obedient slaves ,it needs more people standing up and telling shills to mind their own business. A general strike would do much to remind these reprobates just who actually runs this country. Those that don't like can go back to their own country. All who ignorantly claim to be "US Citizen" do not understand that their country's actual territory includes Washington DC, Pueto Rico, and a few little islands. If one does not understand what I am talking about then I suggest they educate themselves and become proper members of our Sovereign Republic. Remember Mr. Huffmann: The Law Cannot Compel Perfomance! If you do not understand why that is true then you have no business telling other people what they should or should not do!

by Roage (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 53 comments) on Thursday, June 14, 2007 at 5:08:53 PM
 


I am a professional life-extensionist and liberty promoter who practices what I and husband, Paul Wakfer, preach. More detail about both of us - philosophically and physically - at http://morelife.org/personal/

When the comment time period has closed at OpEdNews.com, readers are welcome to post their comments/questions at MoreLife Yahoo after meeting the posting requirements of that group, sent to all new members upon joining. All archived messages, however, are available to anyone....

to see more of bio, click on member name

Kitty Antonik WakferI am a professional life-extensionist and liberty promoter who practices what I and husband, Paul Wakfer, preach. More detail about both of us - philosophically and physically - at http://morelife.org/personal/

When the comment time period has closed at OpEdNews.com, readers are welcome to post their comments/questions at MoreLife Yahoo after meeting the posting requirements of that group, sent to all new members upon joining. All archived messages, however, are available to anyone....

to see more of bio, click on member name

The REAL Problem of Road Usage

The problem is that the roads are not privately owned and the use of which is by contract. In such a case - just as with a private business in which the customer does not obey the rules of the establishment - the road user would be a former user of that road. Instead roads are viewed as a commons, open to anyone and because they are paid for by taxes - money taken from property owners and purchasers of various products, especially motor fuel.

With current transponder technology, electronic monitoring of road usage for payment is possible making private ownership and operation of thoroughfares also possible. Then when someone doesn't obey the owner's rules, they suffer whatever consequences the owner has set and all users have agreed to prior to usage.

Even now with governments in essence owning the roads, this view reasonably could take place. However, governments are not businesses that must operate in the marketplace and can also be ignored by those who do not wish their product or service. In addition, they obtain their operating funds from taxpayers by force (or threat of it), and it is a never ending source - no profit is necessary. And governments operate as a monopoly, allowing no competition in the many services it has co-opted as theirs in a deemed geographical area. The rules decreed by governments - local and state typically for road usage - are often arbitrary and without true market competition of alternate routes or modes. There is little/no incentive for keeping the customer happy (ie. keeping the traffic moving smoothly). And with the federal government controlling the use of the skies, the boundless space above the ground is virtually closed to private individual transportation methods.

Government presence in transportation - including roads by way of construction, maintenance and operation - has created the problems like those described, and its attempts to reduce them creates more. When significant numbers of people in an area come to see governments as a hindrance and understand that interactions to mutual benefit between people can take place without governments, then the many existing private alternatives - and ones not even yet conceived - will have a real chance to operate.

**Kitty Antonik Wakfer

by Kitty Antonik Wakfer (19 articles, 3 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 111 comments) on Thursday, June 14, 2007 at 11:47:56 PM
 


I am a retired civil servant. I was an electronics technician.
BarkerI am a retired civil servant. I was an electronics technician.

"rules don't apply to me"

You are right - America is run amok with psychotic imbeciles (I remember the album from the early 1970s, 'twenty-first century schizoid man').
What can we do? We can set examples for others to follow. I eat meat sparingly, less than six pounds a year. I drive less than 7,500 miles. I do not worship celebrities who travel by private jet (how much carbon does that emit) so they (or their bodyguards ) can carry a piece (so much for opposing the Second Amendment).
And I practice family planning. I do not want to be responsible for destroying the planet by growth and development. I have made the decision to have one child and adoption.

by Barker (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 119 comments) on Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 5:52:14 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not Pass by Patrick Henningsen

30 Lies Refuted about Ayers and Obama Posted by John Wilson

Those Who Call Obama A Muslim Posted by Rob Kall

Palin Debate Performance Deconstructed by Steven Leser

Albright, Clarke, 200 Diplomats Laud Obama's Willingness to Talk Directly to Adversaries Without Preconditions Posted by Stephen Fox

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

All that's missing are the uniforms! Posted by W. Christopher Epler (Bill)

The End of American Hegemony by Paul Craig Roberts

Meet The $700 Billion Bailout Czar by Rob Kall

The Real Cause of the Current Financial Crisis by Joe Reeser

Go To Top 50 Most Popular