Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

No More!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Remember back a few months, when Republican leaders in the House of Representatives caved to pressure from the moderate wing of their party and proposed raising the minimum wage, hammerlocked at a paltry $5.15 an hour since 1997 by the Republican-controlled Congress? In yet another example of greed disguised as ideology, their proposal was coupled to a cut in inheritance taxes on multimillion-dollar estates, a cut that would each year benefit only the tiniest sliver about 13,000 of America's wealthiest.

Tying the elimination of the estate tax to what would at best be called only a modest step towards establishing a living wage for millions of working poor demonstrated once again the Republican leadership's callous disregard for low-income Americans. Knowing, correctly as it were, that the Senate would vote down any bill eliminating the estate tax, House leaders hoped only with their ploy to give cover to their moderate colleagues for the fall elections, while ensuring the wage hike did not become law.

Which is not to say that even if the minimum wage hike, proposed at $2.10 over three years, were uncoupled from the estate tax measure the Senate would vote its approval. It was just in June of this year that the Republican-controlled Senate rejected a Democratic proposal to raise the minimum wage to just $7.25 over two years.

The fifteen million American workers laboring at forty hours a week at the current minimum wage make just $10,700 a year, barely above the federal poverty level for a single person but well below that for a family of two, let alone three, or four. For 2006, the federal poverty level stands at a laughably low $20,000 for workers with a spouse and two children. Even at $7.25 an hour, the worker's annual income would rise to just $15,080 far from a living wage for a head of household.

Inflation has eroded the minimum wage's buying power to the lowest level in fifty-one years. Tired of waiting for Washington, twenty states have already passed minimum wages higher than the federal level. Six more have a minimum wage hike referendumon the November 7th ballot. And, in Chicago, the city council this summer passed an ordinance requiring workers make a living wage of at least $10 an hour by 2010.

Over seventy percent of Americans support raising the federal minimum wage. Seventy percent either see or are one of the millions of Americans who are working as hard as they can but still need some help to stay afloat. Seventy percent of us are fair-minded enough to recognize that the economy exists to support society and people, not the other way around. This seventy percent must include a fair number of self-labeled Republicans, though obviously not those at the helm of their party.

More than five years under a Republican leadership whose fiscal and social policy takes good care of the rich but shuns the poor, everyday Americans are realizing that the benefits are clearly not trickling down. More than thirty-six million Americans now live in poverty, and over forty million more live in near-poverty. Millions of workers have been displaced from high-end to low-end jobs, and America has gone from being a manufacturing dynamo to having a WalMart, McJobs economy.

Yet the Republican Party leadership is, even today, still offering the same sermon, preaching that the solution to poverty is to grow the economy out of the problem, to cut taxes on the wealthy so severely that the revenue generated by their reinvestment will more than offset losses to the Treasury.

But rather than foster growth, the massive Republican tax cuts for rich (read: Republican) people not to mention their catastrophic blunder in Iraq have instead over five short years fostered enormous deficits and a growing American underclass. Their free-spending, revenue-slashing, help-the-wealthy and damn-the-deficits style of governing has led to growing economic unfreedom for working families, and greater income inequality between the richest Americans and the rest of us.

Poor and middle-class Americans today are working harder and longer than ever, saving less, borrowing more, commuting longer distances, and increasingly doing without. Larger numbers of working Americans are just trying to survive, trying to stand on their own two feet and take care of their families. Individuals and families are struggling ever more to meet basic needs, and to make ends meet.

The poor and middle-class are losing ground in America, even as they do all the things that society says that they should. But the Republicans keep telling us that the economy is growing so don't worry, be happy!

But as the economy expands year after year, low-paying jobs increase and good jobs leave the country. Poverty rises, and the real incomes of working families stagnate. Pensions decline, and health care becomes a luxury. On their watch, the economy may indeed by doing fine, but the people in it quite simply are not.

On November 7th, it is time for Americans to say "no more!" to the fiscal and social policies of the Republican leadership that have resulted in billions of dollars fleeing our Treasury and our pocketbooks. "No more!" cutting taxes on the wealthy and spending on the poor. "No more!" shifting debt to the next generations. "No more!" indecent wages for decent, hard-working Americans.

Families that work hard and full-time shouldn't be poor in America. On November 7th, Americans need to elect politicians of every stripe who will support a living family income, who will put poverty relief ahead of tax relief for the rich, and who will put the interests and needs of America's workers ahead of corporations and wealthy estate-owners. In the fight against poverty, there's no Republican or Democrat way there's only the right way. On November 7th, let's vote the right way, and send the wrong way packing.

 

www.strangeanimals.us

Todd Huffman is a pediatrician and writer living in Eugene, Oregon. He is a regular contributor to many newspapers and publications throughout the Pacific Northwest.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Does Freedom Mean Anymore?

The Crisis of Meth

Poverty In America: A Republican Moral Failing

Stem Cells To Stay Locked Up

Rules Don't Apply To Me

Do Parents Matter?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
yet I have heard little from our candidates regard... by ardee D. on Tuesday, Oct 31, 2006 at 7:14:50 AM