Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Victory in NY City Council

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

Victory in New York City Council

Resolution 131 for paper ballots and optical scanners passed the New
York City Council by unanimous vote on March 14, 2007.

The resolution was brilliantly written by the council to make clear to
all that elections must be observed by the people, and should not
require "trust" in computer experts to say whether the votes were
properly handled.

PHOTOS of the festive press conference are at
http://www.wheresthepaper.org/Res131PressConf.html

Here is the text of the resolution, and quotes from 19 national, state,
and local organizations are below the resolutions.

---TEXT OF RESOLUTION 131---



Res. No. 131-A

Resolution urging the New York State Board of Elections to promptly
certify Precinct Based Optical Scan voting systems that are compliant
with the New York State Board of Elections voting system standards for
procurement by the county Boards of Elections and urging the Board of
Elections in the City of New York to select a Precinct Based Optical
Scan system that is compliant with the New York State Board of Elections
voting system standards as the new voting technology for the City of New
York.

Whereas, Honest, observable, and easily-verified public elections
constitute the foundation of representative democracy; and

Whereas, Public confidence in the outcome of elections depends on voting
technology that is easy to use and enables citizens to observe,
understand, and attest to the reliable and secure handling of votes; and

Whereas, The federal Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) was intended
to address concerns with the manner in which elections were conducted
following the Presidential Election of 2000; and

Whereas, HAVA requires states to undertake various measures to modernize
elections and increase voter participation; and

Whereas, In 2005, the New York State Legislature enacted the Election
Reform and Modernization Act (ERMA) in order to comply with HAVA; and

Whereas, ERMA requires county boards of election to select new voting
technology to replace the mechanical lever machines, which are currently
used throughout the state; and

Whereas, Under ERMA, county boards of election may select either a
Precinct Based Optical Scan (PBOS) voting system or a Direct Recording
Electronic (DRE) voting system; and

Whereas, Further, under ERMA, the New York State Board of Elections is
responsible for certifying that voting systems are compliant with its
standards and can be procured for use by the county boards of election; and

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Teresa Hommel is a voting activist in NY and chair of the Task Force On Voting Integrity, Community Church of New York.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments