![]() |
|
|
May 11, 2008 at 09:00:42
Obamas 0.7% Global Poverty Tax: High Treason by Susan Allen Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|
Dear Senator Kennedy, Despite this, Senator Barack Obama, has submitted S. 2433 The 'Global Poverty Act.' Obama's bill (S. 2433), seeks to commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7% of our gross domestic product on foreign aide, which is $30 billion more than we're already paying in foreign aide. The submission of this bill, I allege, is high treason. The Founders of this country fought the Revolutionary War to free the United States from the scourge of British taxation without representation. Taking from one what hasn't been earned constitutes deprivation of property without due process of law.
Next time, please advise Congress to examine Constitutional law before submitting bills.
Sincerely,
Susan Allen, M.Ed.
cc. Brookline Town Meeting members
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 11 comments |
|
It is sad to see debunked stuff here. It insults OEN peeps.
Crafting false claims and misrepresentations about Obama, is the preoccupation of hateful FUXNews and hate-filled Rash Lamebrain, (whose seditious insurrection invective aims to float Hillary to the top of a pool of 'Chaos Op' he causes), and such massmind broadcasted sources are worse than unnewsworthy -- they are anti-News. Quoting Kincaid, Limbaugh falsely asserted Obama bill "would commit the United States to spending 0.7 percent of GDP on foreign aid" by meremark (1 articles, 3 quicklinks, 30 diaries, 572 comments [22 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, May 11, 2008 at 10:56:56 AM
|
|
Reply: sad piece of commentary
Since when do OpEd writers get their information from FOX? by Helen (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 36 comments [6 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, May 11, 2008 at 12:03:24 PM
|
|
Reply: Information not from FOX News
I didn’t get any information from FOX News. I researched the legal citations mentioned within the bill itself. by Susan Allen (18 articles, 3 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 23 comments) on Monday, May 12, 2008 at 3:54:24 PM
|
|
Reply: All three candidates are Globalists
Look, if we want to hold on to our national sovereignty, it's time we looked beyond the bait and switch staged show these three stooges are putting on for us. Evidence reveals McCain, Clinton and Obama are Globalists. All three are guilty of treason for voting to fund murder of the innocent in the war in Iraq, (Iraq didn't invade the U.S.) and expectedly all three are related to European royalty or U.S. "royalty" here in the U.S. Check it out. Obama is said to descend from the Duchess of Windsor. Reporters claim Bill Clinton's Jay Rockefeller's son and McCain's people state McCain is descended from Robert the Bruce. It's all in the family -> nepotism. A spokesman for McCain said last night: "The ancestry claim is based upon a genealogical study the McCain family had in their possession, which traced the McCain family roots back to Robert the Bruce." http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/21/johnmccain.uselections2008 by Susan Allen (18 articles, 3 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 23 comments) on Sunday, May 11, 2008 at 10:13:58 PM
|
|
Reply: Central Bank Counterfeiters behind Global Tax
UN PUSHES FOR GLOBAL TAXES INTERNATIONALIST SCHEME PROPOSED BY KOFI ANNAN http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/global_taxes.html Ron Paul on latest UN Global Tax Scheme The UN global tax plan also resurrects the long-held dream of the “Tobin Tax,” and doubles the targeted income from such a tax to a whopping $3 trillion. … I have been fighting continuously against these UN efforts to pick your pocket. … I successfully amended the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act … to prohibit … funds ..to develop … . taxation or fees … to raise revenue for the UN by Susan Allen (18 articles, 3 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 23 comments) on Monday, May 12, 2008 at 5:14:38 PM
|
|
What do we spend our money on?
Has Ms Allen complained about paying for the war in Iraq, the millions spent on mercenaries in the Middle East and on an enormous embassy-fort in Bagdhad? If less than 1% of our GNP is such a monstrous amount of money to spend on helping starving and dying human beings, well let's not. Let's give it to Halliburton, the Pentagon, the pharma's, agribusiness, the Saudis, Ms Allen will think it money well-spent. by Bryna Hellmann (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 21 comments [3 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, May 11, 2008 at 12:50:00 PM
|
|
Reply: Look at the Big Picture
If members of Congress are so "proud" of this bill, why was it voted on by voice vote, not roll call? Make no mistake about it. This bill seeks to subvert the constituted government of the U.S. to the U.N. The goal is Internationalist Monopoly on all Governments. by Susan Allen (18 articles, 3 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 23 comments) on Sunday, May 11, 2008 at 6:28:05 PM
|
|
Reply: International control on all nationalists is not a bad thing
Nationalistic hubris, which fosters nationalistic SupremeRacism against other nationalistics, that is a bad thing. Your country and people are NOT better persons than any other country and people. World social conscience is the counterweight of powermad autocrats. Thank Evolution for the internet. International control, since it regards and governs the only planet and 'international ultimate' that we, humankind, have, then of course it is a monopoly. Monopoly is not the same as predatory. Monopoly business gives 'monopoly' a bad name, yet there are ways granted monopoly license with public oversight -- a Post Office, or broadcast media facilities, for examples -- can be done right. Let there be no 'second' United Nations. Let all nationalistical-obsessed powercrazies obey this one. by meremark (1 articles, 3 quicklinks, 30 diaries, 572 comments [22 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, May 11, 2008 at 8:24:47 PM
|
|
Reply: Obama: Globalist
The Internationalists are rolling on the floor with laughter at us because they think we’re too dumb to see through their staged show. Rothschild and Rockefeller created Communism as a cover for them to create a dictatorship in Russia. They sought and gained total ownership of all property (monopoly) and took total control of Russia’s people. Communism is a carrot to lure idealistic, trusting people into accepting a non-representative. Think about it. The “People” didn’t run Russia after the Communists took over, and China doesn’t have a representative government now. Consider, Obama was probably set up to submit this bill, because the Internationalists thought people would believe Obama, being African American, would truly be interested in helping the poor. Don’t bet on it. He’s said to be descended from the Duchess of Windsor. Consider hidden nepotism is going on behind the scenes. If Obama checked out as a dedicated public servant, I would vote for him. An African American in our town advised our peace group not to vote for Obama. He advised us to vote for Cindy McKinney. I voted for her in the Primary by write in. She’s recommended by a lot of activists groups who do their homework. She does check out as a dedicated public servant. If she makes it on the ballot this November, I’m voting for her. by Susan Allen (18 articles, 3 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 23 comments) on Sunday, May 11, 2008 at 11:01:17 PM
|
|
Reply: Lotsa 'yes'
Spot-on about Rothschild and Rockefeller. However, their formulation of communal- and social-interest governance, and the Soviet and Sino formulations cited, are inconsiderate. Particularly, socialistic economics in autocratic dictatorial administration is still a dictatorship. Communism is not a dictatorship, socialism is not a dictatorship, capitalism is not a dictatorship. These are economic and financial inceptions usually defined in 'currency' or 'money' precepts in trade and commerce. Dictators, (autocrats, monarchs), are a dictatorship. Cultism and iconic ('Christ') worships are similar. --- And, right on about voting for Cynthia McKinney -- she rocks!, the real deal. by meremark (1 articles, 3 quicklinks, 30 diaries, 572 comments [22 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, May 12, 2008 at 12:12:37 PM
|
|
By FOX,
I meant that you left out all of the debunked items in the post above me, which you never did answer. OpEd definitely needs to get some quality writers who research their arguments better. This isn't the Susan Allen married to former Senator George Allen, is it? by Helen (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 36 comments [6 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 12:55:20 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |