Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (7 comments)

O'Reilly Smears Huffpo with His Standard Jackboot Ignorance of Free Speech

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

What a surprise. Bill O'Reilly thinks the Huffington Post and Arianna Huffington have "no problem with publishing hate speech." I guess blaspheming the DailyKos was getting old.

In his weekly website column which will appear across the country in newspapers, like Sunday in the L.A. Daily News oped section along with my weekly column, O'Reilly took Arianna and Huffpo to task for allowing questionable statements concerning Nancy Reagan's injury.

Close to 200 comments were posted to the Reagan story. There were some that were in bad taste, and there were plenty who wrote in to say that they too were bad. They too were allowed by "Arianna and HuffPo" to be posted . Just like the negative comments.

Fact is, Bill, you don't even know if the person posting in the lefty who hates Nancy Reagan or a right wing poster trying make Huff Post look bad. But it doesn't matter who is commenting, they have a perfect right to. It's called free speech, Bill.

But Bill writes to say that "freedom of speech... is a canard." A duck, you hear. "Hate speech is hate speech, whether it's being spewed by some nut wearing a Nazi armband, or some gnome hunched over a keyboard. People like Arianna Huffington should be taken out to the village square and publicly scolded."

Beautiful, Bill. In one sentence you say this kind of free speech is the same as what Nazis spewed and in the next sentence you put on your jackboots and call for Nazi abuse. Should we burn a number into Arianna's arm  too?

You can question the judgment of those who posted the distasteful comments, but if you're going to claim fair and balanceness, you better make sure you rip into both sides with the same energy.

I know you won't because you never have. You've always said that the Right's smears are minuscule as compared to the Left's. What, you've never listened to talk radio? You've never gone through the tons of right wing sites? You've never watched your show?

When you first ripped into DailyKos you admitted you had never even heard of FreeRepublic.com, one of the largest right wing blog sites on the Net. Some crack research staff.

At best you'll say, "the right does it too." But to cover that with equal enthusiasm with which you attack the Left? Never. You might throw out an example but the odds are somewhere in the 1000 to 1 territory that you'll rarely if ever do a story about the right...unless they're actual Nazis. Hmmm.

As you say to back up any point you throw out there... "everyone knows." As in "everyone knows" you are anything but even handed.

Right wing sites are just as want to have a poster place a repugnant remark as the Left.

What about mentioning the comment by Rounder99 that was in the same list of Nancy Reagan comments?

"You sick fuck liberal wing nuts always shame yourselves when someone is in crisis. I hope you all die screaming. ..you sick fuck you wouldn't know class if it bit you on the ass, class you mean like the most cheated on former 1st lady. Class you mean like president blow job, democrats can't have class it comes with the D tag"

Splendid.

Did a far left loon write that? Or was it just a loon? Fact is, we don't know. Neither do you. But just like the comments of those who demeaned Reagan and her health problems, it's disgusting so why didn't you write about that one or the plenty others you can find on right wing sites? Need help? It won't take a crack research staff to find them. I mean, if you wanted them to.

How about the many like Mnmommy's Wishing her a speedy recovery? Or Cathexis's: For my part, Ms Reagan has my sympathies and I wish her a speedy recovery -- which is how I would feel for anyone who had suffered such a setback.
Did Bill see fit to mention those comments? Nah. Wouldn't suit his agenda.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

My "bio" is not relevant to this discussion

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Billo by Michael Dewey on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:27:15 AM
Billo, that word that provokes by shirley reese on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:59:45 AM
O'Reilly delivers 14 year old angry speech. by John Hanks on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:59:00 PM
As I keep saying- by shanti on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:21:31 PM
I am sorry by shanti on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:36:23 PM
Don't be sorry! by Sandy Sand on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:24:44 PM
Won't let this go unanswered by Scott on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:55:00 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum