OpEdNews Op Eds

ndiana "Name-Calling" Researchers Respond To O'Reilly Lies

By       Message Steve Young     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

NOTE: While the LA Times oped page today listed the following editorial as apprearing on the website at  latimes/blowback, as of this morning, it can't be found except if you go directly to: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-conway16may16,0,3767872.story?coll=la-opinion-center

And you can read it below...

From LATimes.com/blowback...

Bill O'Reilly and Krippendorff's Alpha
The authors of the "name-calling" study respond to Ron Mitchell's recent column.
By Mike Conway, Maria Elizabeth Grabe and Kevin Grieves
May 16, 2007

As authors of a study on Bill O'Reilly's rhetoric, we would like to thank the Los Angeles Times, other journalists, media watch Web sites, and bloggers who have brought our research to a wider audience. We are pleased that our work has sparked vigorous debate.

At the risk of sounding like dry academics, here is unspun information in response to the May 10 Blowback piece by Ron Mitchell (senior producer, The O'Reilly Factor).

- Advertisement -

Mr. Mitchell accuses us of methodological bias. Ironically, the procedures we used for the study are scientific practices to guard against the bias that Mr. Mitchell is so concerned about. Perhaps it will ease his concern to know that prior to publication, the study went through two rounds of anonymous peer review, passing rigorous inspection from the social science community.

The mischaracterization of how we counted name-calling could be cleared up by reading the study [pdf]. We did not count "liberal, conservative, centrist" as name-calling unless they were linked to a derogatory qualifier. O'Reilly's reference to "kool-aid left" is an example of what we counted as name-calling. Or is the reference to folks of a particular political persuasion as a cult on a suicide mission fair and balanced reporting?

Mr. Mitchell objects to our comparison of O'Reilly and Father Charles Coughlin. A careful read of our paper will reveal that this comparison is specific to rhetorical use of techniques like name-calling, not--as Mitchell implies--anti-Semitism.

O'Reilly himself insinuated our study was connected to a $5 million grant from George Soros and that we are allied with the Media Matters operation. We received no funding for this study and Media Matters probably came across the research the same way dozens of journalists and bloggers did: from the press release issued by our university.

With these issues cleared up, we hope the debate continues.

Indiana University professors Mike Conway and Maria Elizabeth Grabe, and graduate student Kevin Grieves, are the authors of the study Villains, Victims and the Virtuous in Bill O'Reilly's "No-Spin Zone

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

My "bio" is not relevant to this discussion

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Breaking! McCain Concedes!

Palin/Couric Interview Bombshell: Palin Unable To Name All Her Children's Names

It's Sunday - So Where's Sarah?

Fake FEMA Press Conference Template Making The Rounds

Image of Virgin Mary Found In Sarah Palin's Bouffant

Palin Suspends Vice Presidential Campaign: Rushes Back to Alaska to Keep an Eye on Russia