Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

We'll Give You What You Want, if you'll consider dropping us a crumb from your table

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Well, I guess Congress is going to give Bush another $70 billion to keep our kids in the Cheney/Bush Hell of Iraq and Afghanistan for the foreseeable future. The deal is that they will give him what he wants to promote the war, if he will consider not vetoing the funding bill coming up, which apparently has some 1,100 pieces of pork buried in it.

This apparently is another one of those “must pass” bills, to which every bottom feeder is allowed, if not encouraged, to attach any big pork payoffs, so they will become law if the government is to continue being funded.

Then, when a constituent complains, they get an apology from their alleged representative that, they are sorry, but they had to vote for it as it was part of a “must pass” bill.

In the runup to yet another Congressional vacation, the Congress has passed several thousand pages of legislation of which nobody but lobbyists and staff has read any more than the title. Buried in that legislation are items such as the REAL ID Act, which was rejected hands down several times as stand alone legislation. It is now the Law of the Land (“Your papers, please?”)

Hundreds of pork payoff items are attached to these bills. Apparently, after these things are attached to a bill, the only way to get rid of them is to defeat the bill, and since the bill is to get money to meet the government (read Senate and House) payroll, and the pork is paid for out of our pockets, with our tax money, they just go ahead and vote for it (on the advice of their staff and the lobbyists that pay them) and let us pay the bills.

Short of armed revolution, if we are ever to have a representative Constitutional Republic again, we must somehow get the Read the Bills Act  http://www.downsizedc.org/rtba_legislation_p.html  and the One Subject at a Time Act http://www.downsizedc.org/osta-legislation_p.shtml  introduced and passed. At one time, every bill had to be read aloud in the House and Senate, and heard and understood by the members. Then, as the House and Senate gained power, they unilaterally decided that that required them to actually work for their pay! So, they passed a law that they only had to listen to the title of a bill and vote on it. Their staff could skim over it and make a recommendation, based on what the lobbyists told them. Remember, the House and Senate are only in session about three days a week, for just a few months a year. The rest of their time is taken up campaigning and fund raising for the next election only four years away, when not going on junkets to see how somebody else does something on the Rivera or Bali or wherever.


The Read the Bills Act says that members shall be present for the complete reading of all bills in open house. The bills will be available on line for constituents to review before they come up for a vote. All votes will be roll call votes so the constituents will be able to see how their representatives voted. The legislators will have to certify under penalty of perjury that they have read and understood the bill before voting on it.

This will have two salutary effects. 1. It will eliminate those “Gone with the Wind” several hundred page bills that are currently voted on without reading or considering. 2. It will put legislators on record about the laws they pass or reject.

The One Subject at a Time Act will restrict bills to just one subject. No pork, no attachments. A federal financing bill will consist of federal financing; no unpopular dam projects, no big oil giveaways, no multi-million dollar bridges to nowhere. An education bill will address education, not have enhanced Homeland Security powers buried in it. Any amendments to the bill have to deal with the bill, and only the bill.

Again, this will have two salutary effects. 1. As above, the bills will be shorter and more understandable. 2. It will force pork and underhanded legislation to stand alone, to be subject to evaluation on its own merits (or lack thereof). There are billions of dollars given away every year, and hundreds of pieces of draconian, special interest and restrictive legislation passed each year by being hidden in these unread, five or six hundred page bills that are routinely approved by the House and Senate. These are things that would never be passed if they were considered in the light of day. Many would not even be brought up if they were to be seen.

What do We the People do about this? Well, going back to the start of this article, we had better get on the horn and let our alleged representatives know that we want no compromise, or surrender, to Cheney/Bush about ending the war. No money without a deadline for bringing the troops home, the money to be used for that purpose. If Bush wants to veto money for running the government, so be it. Congress can just keep passing a finance bill and let Cheney/Bush keep explaining how they would rather have the government go broke than not get their way about their illegal wars. Perhaps that would awaken some of the American Sheeple.

The second thing we can do is start insisting that our alleged representatives introduce the Read the Bills Act and the One Subject at a Time Act, read them over carefully, then enact them and bring some accountability back to the House and Senate and our alleged representatives. Perhaps then, we could strike out the “alleged” and consider them to be actual representatives.

That would give us a gigantic step “backwards” to when we actually had a representative government, elected by We the People and responsive to Us. Something we all look forward to, I’m sure.

 

Biobyte: Stephen M. Osborn is a freelance writer living on Camano Island in the Pacific Northwest. He is a columnist for the Populist Party website and has had a number of articles published internationally. He is an "Atomic Vet." (Operation (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments