Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Capital Murder in Texas

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

Suppose, hypothetically, that the mayor and city council of a Texas border town learned that the city was threatened by criminals on the far side of the border in Mexico. Suppose the mayor then ordered the chief of police to organize an armed posse to enter Mexico and kill people the mayor identified as criminals, and suppose the chief carried out this order. Could the mayor get away with this?

It's probably fair to say that most Texas prosecutors would charge him with mass murder and put him on trial for his life. Under Sections 19.02 and 19.03 of the Texas penal code, a person commits capital murder when he intentionally takes the lives of two or more people.

The mayor might argue that he was justified in the killings because his victims were criminals, and he was acting in defense of the community. Under Section 9.31 of the penal code, a person is justified in using force against another when force is immediately necessary to protect himself or another person against the victim's use of unlawful force. The mayor might have some trouble producing evidence of an "immediate" threat under the circumstances.

He might argue that as a high-ranking public official, he had the authority to order the killings. In our system of enumerated powers and due process of law, however, he would have trouble producing a license to kill as a perquisite of his office. He would hardly dare to claim the protections of Section 9-21, which allows the use of deadly force in the lawful conduct of war. He doesn't have the authority to declare war or launch a military operation against Mexico.

He might argue that he didn't actually kill anybody, but that would be unavailing. Under Section 7.02 of the penal code, a person is responsible for an offense committed by another if he solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other person to commit the offense.

He might argue that all the deaths occurred in Mexico, but that argument wouldn't hold up. Under Section 1.04 of the penal code, Texas has jurisdiction over an offense if the conduct in Texas constitutes an attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit an offense in another jurisdiction that is also an offense under the laws of Texas. Conspiring in Texas to commit mass murder in Mexico is a capital crime in Texas.

- Advertisement -

What the executive and legislative branches of a city government would never dare do, the executive and legislative branches of our national government have done. For over five years, our leaders, without recourse to a constitutional declaration of war, have conspired to dispatch soldiers to kill people in foreign countries.

A considerable part of the criminal conduct, especially that committed by the executive branch employees, occurred in Texas, where the penalty for it is death. A responsible and courageous prosecutor could single-handedly end the war and restore public confidence in our legal system by bringing these felons to justice under the laws of Texas.

- Advertisement -

 

Hartford, Connecticut, lawyer, grandfather, Air Force veteran. Author/publisher, Current Invective www.currentinvective.com

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Capital Murder in Texas

Fort Hood Mystery

Censored: Media Consolidation Debate

Yoo Disbarment Sought

All In for Rotten AIG

Connecticut Congressman Dodges Impeachment Questions

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Seeing the truth must be hard for the other Americ... by martinweiss on Thursday, May 1, 2008 at 11:55:59 PM
Just a lawyer who grieves for the rule of law.&nbs... by Steve Fournier on Friday, May 2, 2008 at 5:24:29 AM
US government history is rife with madness resulti... by Michael McCoy on Friday, May 2, 2008 at 6:07:28 AM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2015, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum