George Bush says that he entered the “war against terror” to avenge the deaths of 3,000 Americans who died on 9/11.
Three-thousand Americans did die on 9/11 and, even though I am a Canadian and not an American, I honor every one of them. But, in my view, they did not die in an act of foreign terror.
I allege that they died at the hands of unknown parties under the direction of President George Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney.
This September 11, let’s remember how they died and why they really died. Because we now stand on the verge of perhaps the biggest catastrophe that we could ever conceive if we behave like sheep around 9/11 and allow America to go to war with Iran.
Let's review the events of that day.
Remember the Fox employee who reported from the street that the second plane to hit the World Trade Center did not look like a passenger plane? It had no windows, he said, and it had no logo like any he had ever seen.
It was not a passenger plane. It was a military drone. The first time the United States considered using military drones was in the Lyman Lemnitzer/Joint Chiefs’ plan called the Northwoods Document (google) in the early 1960s. Drones have been used to test the impact on planes of jet-fuel crashes for decades.
When the second plane hit WTC 2, that would have been the first crash that you and I observed on TV that day. The networks did not catch the first crash. The film that the French crew shot was aired the next day.
But George Bush could tell an audience a while later that he saw the first crash while he was on his way into the Florida classroom. What channel might he have been watching that none of the rest of us had access to? How was whoever filmed it able to catch a plane crashing into the WTC when no one else knew about it? I argue that the coincidence is improbable.
No reinforced steel and concrete building before or since WTCs 1 and 2 has collapsed because of a fire.
Yet there is that small matter of a 48-storey building that did collapse because of a fire. A little known building. You may have overlooked it, although it proves the fraudulence of the whole 9/11 scenario.
It was that other WTC building. WTC 7. It had an office fire in it. Just paper burning. No plane and no great degree of debris hit it. And yet, at around 5:30 p.m. on 9/11, owner Larry Silverstein gave the order to “pull it.” Pull a 48-storey building with a small fire in it. Well, as I recall, nothing surprised us on 9/11 after the Twin Towers collapsed.
But, nevertheless, “pulling it” is a demolition term for bringing the building down in a controlled explosion.
Notice in the videos of that day, which we may see again this year, that the New York firemen on the street receive an order to clear the area some time before Building 7 comes down (I think it was an hour before) and then blam! Down it comes.
Silverstein told the command of the FDNY to pull Building 7 and the command did. Did the FDNY command say to Silverstein: "What do you mean - pull it?" After all, how would the FDNY know that Building 7 was rigged with thousands of thermate cutter charges to "pull"? Does that not suggest that the FDNY command was also "in the know," before 9/11 or during?
The video shows WTC 7 neatly falling into its own center and then collapsing straight down, just like a controlled demolition. Well, if it was a controlled demolition, the thousands of thermate charges needed to do it could not have been positioned that day. They must have been positioned before 9/11.
