OpEdNews Op Eds

Medicare For All via H.R. 676

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Group(s): , Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


It is obvious that none of the major Presidential candidates of either the Democratic or Republican Parties are supporting the right approach to providing universal healthcare. Frankly, all the Republican candidates are going to be major obstacles to achieving this national goal. While the top Democratic candidates (Clinton, Edwards and Obama) do support the concept, they are all offering Band-Aid approaches for a life-threatening economic and health crisis in America.

A bill has already been introduced in The House by Congressman John Conyers that effectively addresses the issue. H.R. 676 expands Medicare to cover all citizens.


The scope of the healthcare crisis in America is huge. It has very serious economic and moral implications. It is crippling our nation in terms of protecting American manufacturing, competing in the global economy and undermines our national security. It reflects badly on us as a just and moral society. It is literally killing Americans in huge numbers.


The number of Americans without health insurance is currently 47 million and growing rapidly. The number of underinsured Americans is much larger than the number of uninsured Americans. In America, over half of all personal bankruptcies are the direct result of medical crises. Over half of those bankruptcies are from individuals who had health insurance when their medical crises started.


Industry friendly studies of the number of Americans who died because they had no health insurance place the number at around 50 per week. The number is absurdly low and illogical.


 Doing without healthcare at any point in life for a significant period of time will likely create health issues and physical damage. This damage accumulates over a lifetime and shortens your lifespan. You die younger than you would have if you had always had adequate healthcare. You might die at 70 instead of 85. In addition, the last years might have much lower levels of quality. Since most people die after reaching the age where Medicare coverage is already in effect, those deaths are not counted as resulting from a lack of healthcare insurance although they can be directly traced to an earlier lack of coverage. Most of the deaths resulting from a lack of healthcare insurance are thus concealed.


Even using the fraudulent 50 per week figure, killing Americans to preserve the profits of HMO’s and insurance companies is completely immoral. Bankrupting Americans because of illness is a national disgrace. It does not happen in other industrialized nations. Out of the top 75 most industrialized nations in the world, only in the United States are citizens not provided by their government with universal healthcare.


In the United States, we saddle our businesses and corporations with the cost of providing for the healthcare needs of their employees. Our international competitors do not. This is one of the major reasons why good paying manufacturing and service sector jobs are leaving our nation. It is economic suicide.


None of the Band-Aid approaches advocated by the top Democratic Presidential candidates deal effectively with the trade implications of healthcare policy. I am personally supporting Edwards because he is more inclined to advance fair and balanced trade agreements than Clinton and Obama. For example, Clinton and Obama supported the most recent “so-called free trade” agreement with Peru while Edwards did not. However, even Edwards has not yet addressed the clear connection between international trade and healthcare.


The best solution for providing universal healthcare is expanding Medicare to cover all American citizens. Medicare is a proven program. It is popular and cost-effective. Our current private system has much higher levels of overhead costs than does Medicare. The only inefficient aspects of Medicare are the “privatized” programs added by the Bush White House and their Republican allies in the Senate. Medicare has been hugely successful despite ongoing Republican and corporate attempts to undermine it.


We can count on Republican politicians to label any move toward universal healthcare as “socialized medicine.” They attempted mightily to destroy Medicare in the past using such tactics and failed completely. Politically, providing universal healthcare by expanding Medicare will be much easier than any other approach.


The private, profit-drive healthcare system is terribly unfair and inefficient. We spend 17 percent of our total economy on healthcare while our international competitors spend only 8 percent. They cover everyone and we do not. The numbers speak for themselves!


Expanding Medicare to cover everyone will not prevent citizens from buying supplemental healthcare if they can afford it. It will greatly help doctors who are General Practitioners by making medical need become effective demand. It will help hospitals by removing the burden of providing healthcare to those who cannot pay for it. It will make our workers healthier and more productive.


There must be a grassroots movement built behind “Medicare For All.” Local activists, union leaders, businesses and politicians must all exert their efforts in a common movement. Most national union organizations and state AFL-CIO organizations are supporting H.R. 676. They are joined by many members of Congress. The legislation has 89 co-sponsors with more being added frequently. Many candidates are backing it!


Local leaders are already getting organized all over the nation. People like Amos B. McCluney, Jr. in Delaware and Alena Bandy in Maryland are actively organizing Medicare For All state chapters.  Both leaders are grassroots Democratic activists with roots in the United Auto Workers. Both are reaching out into the community recruiting civil rights leaders, churches, community organizations and local politicians behind H.R. 676. They are not alone. I personally have talked with local activists from Tennessee, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania and several other states who are working on building support for this legislation.


Pressure must be placed on all opinion leaders to support Medicare For All. Presidential, Senatorial and Congressional candidates should be pressured to support H.R. 676. All candidates should be placed on record that they would not veto Medicare For All nor place legislative obstacles in the way of passing H.R. 676, even if they do not actively support passage. Candidates failing to make such public pledges should not be supported by any American citizen.


Average Americans must reframe the debate over healthcare. Instead of calling for universal healthcare or single-payer healthcare, we should simplify the debate. We should be calling for “Medicare For All” and supporting H.R. 676.

Next Page  1  |  2


Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Urge passage of H.R. 676 which expands Medicare to cover all citizens.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Stephen Crockett is co-host of Democratic Talk Radio and author of the Democratic Voices opinion column.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Letterman Joke deception, Smears and Cynicism of Sarah Palin

Delaware State Worker Pay Cut Fight: Part 2

The Jindal Lesson: Keeping Those Republicans Out of Power

The Citizens United Trap for Republicans

Suggested Amendments to the U.S. Constitution for 2011

The Tea Party Does a Striptease and It Turns Out to be the Republican Party with Misspelled Signs


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
You seem to have the same mistaken belief that man... by Watching on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 7:29:23 AM
Funding Medicare For All can be done many differen... by Stephen Crockett on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 8:02:13 AM
Sweden's ruined?  I had no idea.  Pl... by Bob Kincaid on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 9:31:44 AM
This article will not be well received among the i... by ardee D. on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 8:09:26 AM
This article will not be well received among the i... by ardee D. on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 8:10:20 AM
I am going to respectfully disagree with the WATCH... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 8:24:08 AM
I would only add that the current healthcare "... by Bob Kincaid on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 9:07:36 AM
ILLINOIS TEACHERS UNIONS ENDORSE HR 676Chicago, Il... by Stephen Crockett on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 9:48:54 AM
Excuse me, but Dennnis Kucinich has proposed "... by Caronome on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 12:44:56 PM
He is unlikely to go up in the polls significantly... by Stephen Crockett on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 4:03:31 PM
Under your proposal, if I am GE Medical and I am d... by Patrick Henry on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 3:42:18 PM
First of all, the current system kills people in l... by Stephen Crockett on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 4:11:37 PM
understood, thanks for setting me straight.  ... by Patrick Henry on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 6:54:47 PM
Government will not be driven by profit. Of course... by Stephen Crockett on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 8:58:11 PM
Knocking down ideas falsely being associated with ... by Stephen Crockett on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 9:03:49 PM
Look, you are not even trying to make a point. &nb... by Patrick Henry on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:45:38 PM
"Why?" we need Medicare For All is clear... by Stephen Crockett on Saturday, Dec 29, 2007 at 7:30:11 AM
This is a strange line of argument. Are you really... by Stephen Crockett on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 4:19:24 PM
Here is an important resource site on the subject ... by Stephen Crockett on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 5:07:11 PM
That's right all you single payer ney-sayers, ... by InsuranceTeaseDOTcom on Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 5:42:55 PM