|
|
Tags for This Article:
Government (2557) Republican (1446) Economic (713) Health (645) Wars (557) Greed (339) Taxpayers (165) Ideology (158)
|
Group(s): Democrats (unofficial) Add to My Group
The kind of money being spent by the Bush Republicans can result in saved or lost lives. We all can see the results in the case of Iraq. Launching his optional war against Saddam Hussein, in the way he did, Bush has directly cost the lives of thousands of American soldiers and maybe a hundred thousand mostly innocent Iraqi civilians. We have failed as a nation to come to terms with the massive costs that are less direct and obvious but just as real. The Iraq War we did not really have to fight will certainly cost the American taxpayers over a trillion dollars and maybe much more. The number is so large that few citizens truly understand the number. The best way to get a handle on a trillion dollars is first to imagine a stack of a million one dollar bills. A trillion dollars is a million stacks with a million ones in each stack. Most estimates of the financial resources needed to repair the key infrastructures of the American economy are in the range of one to two trillion dollars. Both the Iraq War and the infrastructure cost needs may be higher than estimated at this time. The infrastructure needs are mostly repairs to bridges, roads, railroads, harbors and public utilities. The cost of the Iraq War would have largely met these essential needs. Spending the money here would have saved American jobs and prevented inevitable future deaths resulting from the inevitable future failures of key infrastructure components. The horror we just witnessed with the collapse of the interstate bridge in Minnesota will become much more common because of the waste of taxpayer money in Iraq. The tax cuts for the Super Wealthy that the Republicans pushed into law during the earliest months of the Bush Administration have been more damaging to the financial ability of the federal government than even the Iraq War. These tax cuts were even less needed than was the invasion and occupation of Iraq. While middle class tax cuts were justified, tax cuts for those making millions of dollars per year were not! The government debt, created by these tax cuts, is going to cost taxpayers trillions of dollars in future interest payments. Government services will be cut. As a result, public needs will not be met. Republican ideology and Republican greed has trumped serving the public good! The government revenues lost as a result of tax cuts for the Super Wealthy would have largely paid for universal, single-payer health care. The United States is the only developed nation in the world to deny their citizens this kind of health care. Germany has been providing this kind of government guaranteed health care for over 120 years. Literally millions of Americans have died earlier than they should have as a result of Republicans blocking health care reform. We could have guaranteed universal health care as far back as President Truman. Republicans have always falsely stated that guaranteed universal health care was just not financially possible. If we could afford trillions of dollars for unwise wars and tax cuts for Super Wealthy individuals who do not need them, we can afford to both rebuild our economic infrastructure and guarantee our citizens universal access to decent health care! Our choices in public spending should save and improve the lives of our citizens instead of killing them. www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com Stephen Crockett is co-host of Democratic Talk Radio and author of the Democratic Voices opinion column.
Picturing a million, etc. Most people can't picture a million very well either. Pick up a magazine with about 200 pages in it, or two 100 page magazines. Find a page with mostly print. A typical magazine will have have 5,000 characters on it, if you include the periods, commas, etc. (Multiply the characters in one row by the number of rows if you want to be sure). Consider that 5,000 dots x 200 pages = 1,000,000 (1 million) dots. Hold the magazine in your hand and ponder the number of characters. Convert each one in your mind to a dollar bill. There's your million dollars. Now for each dot, picture a thousand dollars. That's a billion. (A thousand million, or a million with three more zeros: 1,000,000,000). But this article mentions a trillion. Now we're talking a thousand billion, or a one with nine zeroes: 1,000,000,000,000. That's how much, in dollars, our country has spent to kill, maim, terrorize, and mutilate our fellow humans halfway around the world. These mental images have helped explain many things to myself and also to sixth graders, when contemplating the span of life on earth (4.6 billion years), the age of the universe (around 13 billion years), number of people on earth ((650 billion, last I heard), Bill Gates fortune (up to $90 billion), distance to the sun (93 million miles), and so on. The images break down in astronomy, with the nearest star system, Alpha Centuri, being 4 light years away (the time it takes light, travelling 186,000 miles per second, to reach us). A million light years is considered relatively close, as these things go. by
Daniel Geery (26 articles, 55 quicklinks, 121 diaries, 660 comments)
on Thursday, August 2, 2007 at 8:18:56 AM
I worked as a teacher in the Michigan Department of Corrections for nearly 30 years. I retired from state service in 2003. I am now an adjunct history instructor at Baker College of Muskegon, in Muskegon, Michigan--and I love it.
Infrastructure Collapse How ironic, in light of the collapse of the Minneapolis bridge yesterday! The bridge had been rated as structurally unsound a few years ago, but evidently there were no funds to "fix" the problem. Now, disaster has struck. The cost of the Iraqi imperialistic venture will cost over one trillion dollars. And yet, and yet....We will face more calamaties of this nature unless our priorities are redirected to repairing roads, bridges, water-sewer systems. And redirecting those priorities will require that the "criminal" upward redistribution of wealth that has occured in this country since the hey day of St. Ronald be undone--with a vengeance. The cost of empire is, indeed, high. by
Tom Sciamanna (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 24 comments)
on Thursday, August 2, 2007 at 8:31:48 AM
Thanks Stephen Great article. I felt the need to write a part II. John by
John R Moffett (79 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 591 comments)
on Thursday, August 2, 2007 at 9:51:16 AM
Peggy McCann is a mother and writer living in Greensboro, NC.
Blame Placing I've heard about our impending infrastructure problems for about 15 years now. The Democrat and Bill Clinton didn't put money into it either. The real fault here lies with the American people that pay no attention to what politicians are doing with OUR money. How about, for instance, less money for Congressional raises and more for other things. And that's just a small sample. by
Peggy McCann (18 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 34 comments)
on Thursday, August 2, 2007 at 1:20:26 PM
Great points. Letting neocons make budget decisions is literally killing us. This is from my view as a frustrated Minnesotan who has watched the transportation funding fight for years. by
Kathlyn Stone (33 articles, 204 quicklinks, 19 diaries, 557 comments)
on Thursday, August 2, 2007 at 2:27:03 PM
These people hate government for a reason The Grover Norquist, neo-con conception of government is that it is something which needs to be made non-functional and useless. The reason for their assault on government is that they want you to distrust and hate government so much, that you are willing to privatize everything. Today on CNBC they were talking all day about how we need to privatize the highway system (toll roads everywhere) in order to fix this problem. They failed to mention how government funding has been diverted elsewhere, like Iraq, for the last 5 years. They failed to mention how massive government debt, rung up by the Republicans, is making it harder to fund anything anymore. by
John R Moffett (79 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 591 comments)
on Thursday, August 2, 2007 at 4:20:53 PM
Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
This analysis has two big weaknesses. 1) You're not putting the spotlight on the distinction between who's paying for all these things, and who's profiting from them. For instance, all US taxpayers pay for the Iraq war. The defense contractors & oil corps reap a bonanza from it. So essentially, it's a transfer of wealth from most of the population, to profiteers of the military-industrial complex (MIC). Infrastructure repair would benefit a far larger section of the US population, but would not be nearly so profitable, for those at the top of the feeding chain -- who are coziest with both parties in Washington. You're right that "...government debt, created by these tax cuts, is going to cost taxpayers trillions of dollars in future interest payments. Government services will be cut. As a result, public needs will not be met." // But again, this is little problem for the wealthy, who don't much need govt services, & will invest in government debt. On balance, this condition will actually be beneficial to them. 2) Finally, your attempt to blame all this on "Republicans" is ludicrous & intellectually dishonest. The Dems have gone along with every bit of this stuff, from the tax cuts to the war. Furthermore, they've prevented the public from grasping the real nature of the process. They're too gutless to say publicly that it's an immense wealth transfer from the populace to the MIC & oil corps, because they themselves have been bought by the MIC & oil corps. I challenge you to point to a single statement from a leading Democrat, that calls for an urgent downsizing of the MIC. The Dems are 100% complicit in having helped the MIC to become the out-of-control monster it now is. In fact, the Dems have been no worse about this over time than the Republicans, despite the more blatant public warmongering of Republicans in recent decades. by
Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1026 comments)
on Thursday, August 2, 2007 at 3:23:49 PM
Retired military. Conservative. Politically independent. I enjoy critical thinking. I wish everybody did.
This is analysis? I asked because I was wondering. This article has so many glaring deficiencies that I hardly know where to start. But I'll start with your second statement to wit: "We all can see the results in the case of Iraq." This is so obviously false as to be ridiculous. While I would agree we can see the immediate consequences, no one can see the results. We simply do not know what is going to happen there. That many on the Left wish for a complete failure of the current policy is without doubt. Whether we should have gone into Iraq is an acedemic exercise of small import. What should be done now is the real question. A little farther along in the piece you say, "The cost of the Iraq War would have largely met these essential needs." This may be largely true but it begs the question of whether the absence of the war would have resulted in spending on such a massive scale to repair infrastructure. The obvious answer is no. The Dems as much as the Repubs use pork to build new monuments to themselves. They are uninterested in maintaining the old monuments to someone else. You can posit that spending the money here would have prevented whatever it is you wish to posit it would have prevented but most of the money simply would not have been spent at all and most that was spent would not have gone to infrastructure improvement and repair. Surely you cannot believe otherwise. This simply shows that the Dems don't so much dislike the deficit as much as they dislike what the money was spent on. If the trillion or so dollars spent on Iraq were, instead, spent on social programs not one peep would be heard from the Dems about the deficit. But I digress. You then go on to say, "The government debt, created by these tax cuts..." Government debt is not created by tax cuts. It is created by government spending. Spending, by the way, which grows year after year no matter who is in charge. Then we have to touch on the holy grail of the Left: socialized medic... I mean, universal healthcare. You said, "The government revenues lost as a result of tax cuts for the Super Wealthy would have largely paid for universal, single-payer health care." This shows once again that the argument really isn't about access to health care or the affordability of health insurance. It's simply about getting someone else to pay for it. After all, the "Super Wealthy" can afford to pay for my health care more the I. I didn't believe I would have to wait long before someone blamed the bridge collapse on Bush. You didn't disappoint. by
Joe Reeser (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 23 comments)
on Thursday, August 2, 2007 at 4:40:35 PM
|
|
