OpEdNews Op Eds

Democrats Support The Fairness Doctrine

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Corporate Media pundits and sell-out Democratic personalities are denouncing a return to the Fairness Doctrine standards in broadcasting eliminated by the Reagan Administration. They are falling into a trap set by the Republican Right and the largest corporations in America. Essentially, they are letting Republican political spin set the agenda for “acceptable” political views.

Grassroots Democratic activists do want a return to the Fairness Doctrine and Equal Time provisions in broadcasting. Private business owners are using without charge the public airwaves. These businesses are making huge profits by using public assets that belong to all American citizens. They owe us a public obligation to present diverse opinions and provide balanced public programming.

Using public property for private profit comes with strings. Private profits are only acceptable if the overall policy serves the public good. Our government policy cannot be based solely on making the highest level of profit for the private businesses involved in broadcasting.

Broadcasters who do not give all major viewpoints a voice on their segment of the public airwaves should lose their licenses. This was the situation before the corporatist radicals surrounding Ronald Reagan rigged the system by gutting almost all the public service regulations previously in effect. We need to return to our traditional, pre-Reagan standards.

It is unfortunate that the Corporate Media wants to take support for the Fairness Doctrine off the table for the political leadership of both major Parties. It is really a fool’s errand. The grassroots of the Democratic Party strongly support the Fairness Doctrine and will demand that our candidates support it in 2008.

The Corporate Media attacks on the Fairness Doctrine are creating a backlash. Activists now will not stop at a return of the Fairness Doctrine in broadcasting. Centralized media control is now widely seen as a serious threat to our democratic institutions by most reformers. We need a complete change of direction when it comes to regulating broadcasting.

We need to limit radio station ownership to no more than 20 stations. We should encourage local ownership and minority ownership. Ownership of major city newspapers, radio stations and television stations in the same market should be prohibited.

Democrats should join with other reformers to make our public airwaves actually serve the public interest. Centralized media ownership curtails competition. It lowers the quality of programming. It promotes the possibility of politicization of programming. It drives up advertising costs. It hurts content diversity. It is broken and needs fixed! Democratic politicians who side with the large media corporations instead of the grassroots activists are going to have serious future political problems.

Written by Stephen Crockett (co-host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com).

 

Stephen Crockett is co-host of Democratic Talk Radio and author of the Democratic Voices opinion column.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Letterman Joke deception, Smears and Cynicism of Sarah Palin

Delaware State Worker Pay Cut Fight: Part 2

The Jindal Lesson: Keeping Those Republicans Out of Power

The Citizens United Trap for Republicans

Suggested Amendments to the U.S. Constitution for 2011

The Tea Party Does a Striptease and It Turns Out to be the Republican Party with Misspelled Signs

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
without so much as a word from the president or VP... by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Jul 5, 2007 at 10:38:35 PM
Democratic candidates do need the grassroots activ... by Stephen Crockett on Friday, Jul 6, 2007 at 7:33:01 AM
raised. It's an assertion of blind loyalty to ... by Richard Mynick on Friday, Jul 6, 2007 at 9:37:46 AM
Dennis kucinich for the most part, as far as I can... by aaron on Friday, Jul 6, 2007 at 4:57:29 PM
The fairness doctrine and it's predecessor may... by James on Saturday, Jul 7, 2007 at 2:20:06 AM
What nonsense. The Fairness Doctrine worked before... by Stephen Crockett on Saturday, Jul 7, 2007 at 7:53:50 AM
Odd that I point out abuses of the fairness doctri... by James on Sunday, Jul 8, 2007 at 2:42:10 PM