OpEdNews Op Eds

UNSC Role Change

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (17 fans)
UNSC Role Change We must defend justice with our lives lest we need justice to defend our lives

                                                                        -   Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich

 

As I watched Iran being hauled in front of the United Nations ‘Security’ Council, a vivid picture conjured up in my mind – my native country Iran, a vulnerable and defenseless beauty being prepared for violation by brutal savages.  As she struggles to defend her honor, no one is prepared to come to her aid, save a few.   Even her own children, those raised on her soil hope she will be brutally violated.  With lust-filled eyes, they hope to fulfill their ambitions on her ravaged ruins, her broken pride.

 

Who are these beasts, and what has transformed this United body to such a menace?

 

The most uninformed among us knows that the United States is dictating the rules at the ‘Security’ Council.  The driving force behind the American policy makers’ actions is Israel represented by AIPAC and other Israeli representatives in the United States.  However, while Zionism gives motivation to the neo-conservatives in Washington to rape and ravage the Middle-East, Washington stands to benefit from AIPAC’s/Israel’s commands.

 

While America’s foreign policy is driven by Israel’s interests, as argued by many distinguished scholars such as Mearsheimer and Walt, it would be foolish to assume that some in America do not benefit from these policies.  As The Center for Public Integrity has demonstrated, The Carlyle Group profits from government and conflict[i]; a company that employed some of Washington’s most powerful figures, including former Secretary of State James Baker, former President George H.W. Bush, former Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci and former FCC Chairman William Kennard, as well as former British Prime Minister John Major – not foregoing the Ladin and Saudi ties.   

 

Not surprisingly, among the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) founders were eight people affiliated with the number-one defense contractor Lockheed-Martin, and seven others associated with the number-three defense contractor Northrop Grumman.  Of the twenty-five founders of PNAC twelve were later appointed to high level positions in the George W. Bush administration.  The Pentagon's budget for buying new weapons rose from $61 billion in 2001 to over $80 billion in 2004. Lockheed Martin's sales rose by over 30% at the same time, with tens of billions of dollars on the books for future purchases. From 2000 to 2004, Lockheed Martins stock value rose 300%. Northrup-Grumann saw similar growth with Department of Defense (DoD) contracts rising from $3.2 billion in 2001 to $11.1 billion in 2004. Halliburton, with Dick Cheney as former CEO, had defense contracts totaling $427 million in 2001. By 2003, they had $4.3 billion in defense contracts, of which approximately a third were sole source agreements[ii].

 

Today, Israel is no longer a nascent state, but en par with the world’s only super power – for not only does it have an arsenal of illegal nuclear warheads and one of the strongest conventional armies, but it has influence over US Congress, and many believe, the White House, and given the need for Israel and US for expansion and more profit, Iran it would seem, is the obstacle that must be removed.   

 

One must surely question why Iran would be shunned by all the ‘Security’ council members.  India’s case has demonstrated that non-permanent members are subject to coercion, but what of the permanent members?

 

France - If Iran’s legitimate rights are recognized, Iran would have to have her wealth returned to her; to the dismay of the Europeans.  In 1973 France, Belgium, Spain, and Sweden, formed the joint stock company EURODIF.  Sweden withdrew from the project in 1974. In 1975 Sweden’s 10 per cent share in EURODIF went to Iran as a result of an arrangement between France and Iran. The French government subsidiary company Cogema and the Iranian Government established the Sofidif (Société franco–iranienne pour l’enrichissement de l’uranium par diffusion gazeuse) enterprise with 60 per cent and 40 per cent shares, respectively. In turn, Sofidif acquired a 25 per cent share in EURODIF, which gave Iran its 10 per cent share of EURODIFI.  In  1974, the Shah lent 1 billion dollars (and another 180 million dollars in 1977) for the construction of the factory, to have the right to buy 10% of the production.  Iran remains a shareholder of Eurodif via Sofidif, a Franco-Iranian consortium shareholder which owns 25 % of Eurodif.   According  to The Wall Street Journal of  Dec. 5, 2006,  the price of enriched uranium has increased by 800 percent since 2001, and given the recent  growing interest in nuclear fuel, and the commitment of suppliers, Eurodif would likely prefer to have Iran sanctioned than recognize her legitimate right.  Especially if as before, they are not the ones who have to send soldiers to battlefields.  

 

Bulletin 26 – Dual Use: Avoiding The Nuclear Precipice of the International Network of Engineers and Scientists Against Proliferation  not only confirms  Iran’s share in Eurodif, but lends legitimacy to her wishes to exercise her inalienable right under Article IV of the NPT to enrich uranium indigenously versus the Russian import due to her past experience with foreign dealings [[1]].

 

It must also be noted that Iran has a stake in the world's biggest open-pit uranium mine in the African state of Namibia where the United States buys its uranium for its nuclear power plants[iii].  Much like the 1953 era when the Americans and the British had their eyes on Iran’s precious resources, it would seem that uranium is one more incentive for the violation of Iran.

 

Russia – John D. Grace describes Russia as an "ally and opponent" of OPEC (the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) and the same for oil consumers -- in other words, it is a "fulcrum."[iv]  In spite of Grace’s generous description of Russia, it has raised a few eyebrows in Europe when it has cut off energy supplies at will and as a political tool.    6% of the total known oil reserves are in the former Soviet Union[v].  However, as the world’s biggest supplier of natural gas and one of the largest suppliers of oil, it will greatly benefit from high oil prices due to sanctions and unrest in the Persian Gulf.   This money-strapped nation was willing to supply Iran not only with enriched uranium, but with surface-to-air missiles.  It has decided to halt its cooperation because it understands that conflicts in the Persian Gulf region will double the price of oil – much to its benefit; while at the same time to other Arab countries, much like the US is doing.  Additionally, it also realizes that a ‘nuclear accident anywhere is a nuclear accident anywhere’.  It could be that Russia has it on good authority that this irrational Administration means to bomb Bushehr .  Having weighed the danger of contamination and their surplus profit from an attack on Iran, they opted to vote for the latter.

 

China - It would seem that with China’s growing appetite for oil, their vote would be illogical.  However, China has been making remarkable discoveries of her own.  Not only has she found oil deposits in Bohai Bay near Dalian (source – China Newnet), but  after two years of exploration, it was publicly reported on March 24th that off the coast of Taiwan huge deposits of natural gas, known as the ‘ice that burns’ and labeled as the energy source of the future that had been discovered.[vi]    If Taiwan had been an ‘old war relic’ in the past, it makes her a prize worth fighting for.  Would this make China sway her vote?  Additionally, according to the BBC, China and Venezuela are working on making oil deals that will be mutually beneficial.[vii]

 

And finally, Great Britain.  She was the instigator in the 1953 coup against the democratically elected Prime Minister Mossadeq.  In a role reversal, it would seem that today, GB is the one who is helping incite war.  No doubt with her poor economy, as with the Iraq war, she would be happy with the crumbs off the US table. 

 

What is important to remember is the following:  

 

-           It was the United Nations ‘Security’ Council that stood by idly as Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran for 3 years in violation of the Geneva Conventions.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Soraya has lived and studied in-Iran, UK, France, and has obtained her Master's degree in Public Diplomacy from USC Annenberg and USC School for International Studies, Los Angeles.- She is an independent researcher, public speaker, radio (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Rude Awakening

Nukes and Temples

Abduction or Defection: The Case of Iran's Nuclear Scient

The Mushroom Effect

Samantha Power And The Age Of Genocide; Rwanda 1994 vs Gaza 2014

Blowback in Ferguson

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
I don't know how or why the US has managed to ... by Timothy V. Gatto on Thursday, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:21:49 AM