Tags for This Article:

California (1216)  Energy (495)  Power (188)  Privacy (58) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
January 13, 2008 at 08:54:30

Keep Your Frickin' Hands Off My Thermostat, California!

by Sandy Sand     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

What California is planning to do to control power usage is the Nanny State, Big Brother and "1984" on steroids rolled into one, with a little "Twilight Zone" thrown in for good measure.

These ass-covering Cretins, who've done nothing in years to revamp our electrical grids, want to control our thermostats by remote controlled radio waves.

It's absolutely a double irony that they haven't rewired the state, yet power usage over the past twenty years has remain a constant while the population -- legal and illegal -- has more than doubled.

Why has power usage remained a constant?  Because of vastly more efficient appliances, air-conditioners, heaters and light bulbs.

Keep your frickin' hands off my thermostat!

The California Energy Commission, that august body, which sets our energy-efficiency stands for home appliances, is seeking emergency power to control individual thermostats.

Odds are that will get the autocratic controls they are seeking.

It makes absolutely no difference to me that the new devices will only apply to new home construction and major home remodeling.

It's an absolute invasion of privacy to be able to come into our homes and mess with any household function...by remote control or not.

They might as well be marching through our most cherished possession -- our homes, our individual private castles -- wearing jackboot and swastikas.

Keep your frickin' paws off my thermostat!

I don't let the people who live with me touch the thermostat, so why should I let the State invade my home with their freaky radio waves and either change the temperature or shut it down altogether.

The tacit fight that continually goes on between spouses, roommates, and all co-shares of living quarters is over the thermostat.  One thinks it's too high; one thinks it's too low.

As each walks by, she or he furtively moves the dial or punched buttons...depending on how up-to-date-your system is.  It's kind of like George Carlin's one-cheek-sneak without the tell-tale odor.

We can be goddamn sure that when they're playing with their malicious radio waves at the height of a summer's afternoon, the bastards are doing it from an over-air-conditioned office while wearing parkas.

All they'll feel is that they're cold, so even though the temperature outside in my backyard is in the triple digits they can't see or feel us melting in 112-degrees.

 1  |  2

 

Sandy Sand began her writing career while raising three children and doing public relations work for Women's American ORT (Organization for Rehabilitation through Training). That led to a job as a reporter for the San Fernando Valley Chronicle, a weekly publication in Canoga Park, California. In conjunction with the Chronicle, she broadcast a tri-weekly, ten minuted newscast for KGOE AM. Following the closure of the Chronicle, Sand became the editor of the Tolucan Times and Canyon Crier newspapers in Burbank. She is currently a guest columnist for the Los Angeles Daily News and contributor to ronkayela.com

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments

SW Texas ultra-liberal
john riggsSW Texas ultra-liberal

I pity the fool

that even THINKS about touching MY thermostat. Here in the humid Texas desert wasteland the aircon is more important than food. Any attempt to externally control a privately owned machine and Bertha will speak, and when Bertha speaks she speaks very loud. Bertha is black and not  really very big but what a voice !

by john riggs (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 353 comments) on Sunday, January 13, 2008 at 10:42:00 AM
 


Harpist, unemployed blue collar worker, and Bush basher living deep in the heart of Texas.
PappyHarpist, unemployed blue collar worker, and Bush basher living deep in the heart of Texas.

Riding the slippery slope to hell...

...and without the benefit of a comfort controlled atmosphere.

I doubt that many people thought about the Big Brother-esq implications of forcing their fellow Californians out into the wilderness to have a cigarette. Is this new wrinkle in your state's fucked-up list of priorities anything less than the next step along the slippery slope to Big Brother hell? I mean!

Wouldn't it make more sense to improve the electrical infrastructure? Is that so difficult? After the ass ramming y'all endured as Enron played ping-pong with the prices for electricity, one would think that the powers that be realized perhaps the problem wasn't the users, it was the system. Someone with common sense might have realized the problem, and started taking steps to fix it.

In Texas, or should I say at least here in Big D, our electrical infrastructure is second to none. Why? Well, because someone was smart enough to realize that an overloaded system is a system destined to fail. Even in the worst of the most hellish summers here, not once has anyone in the state of Texas had to endure rolling blackouts, or any of the other shit which has proved how inadequate Cali's electrical infrastructure is. Nope, instead of thinking up Big Brother-esq schemes, we have people investing in and strengthening our grid.

But no, infrastructure improvement is far too simple a solution...and it lack that "we know what's best for the people, so we are going to force them to endure our will" je ne se quoi for which Cali seems famous.

Keep your fucking hands off my thermostat? Nope, how about "do your fucking jobs, you low life, communist fucks!" To me, that seems to be the rallying cry that needs to spring up from Baja to the Cali-Oregon border.

It's that whole common sense thing again. Does it make more sense to fix the real problem, outdated electrical infrastructure, or is it better to once again, have government play the scolding parent, or the ever watchful Big Brother?

I guess when it comes to Cali, you have answered the question.

I bet that Ahhh-nold isn't going to have one of those gadgets placed in his home...what do you think?

Blessed be!
Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 863 comments) on Sunday, January 13, 2008 at 2:03:20 PM
 


This quote summarizes the nature of my concerns and the content of personal experiences which stir my activism:

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement on human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves". --Paul Revere, House of Commons

Kathryn SmithThis quote summarizes the nature of my concerns and the content of personal experiences which stir my activism:

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement on human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves". --Paul Revere, House of Commons

"Emergency" = the argument of tyrants + the creed of slaves

Hello folks

When invoking "emergency" and "Necessity" and "national Security" in relationship to the war on terror, people (except smarter people on this and other forums) " bought it" and still do.

 But here comes one very concrete proof of the point that the term "emergency" here is being used as an excuse to tyrannize our lives.

This has nothing to do with terrorism. And since the EPA itself opposes global warming improvement matters, obviously that is not their concern.

Regardless, to control the thermostats in our own homes is as you point out Sandy (Thank you!!) an invasion of privacy, a medical risk to the physically ill, and who knows what else. Bravo Sandy! Well said.

WHAT"S NEXT?

In Russia, the government controlled peoples' thermostats and hot/cold water supplies. Even the food supplies were controlled.

Is that what we are in for?

The former Iron Curtain border was dotted with graveyards all the way to the horizon of victims shot by border guards. Why? Because they were all condemned spies. I myself, at nine years old, was gunpointed just because we stood at the border for ten minutes.

So much for "Necessity". After all, they were "protecting" the country from spies! Just as we are "protecting" the country from terrorists.

Is this the scenario we have to look forward to at the proposed border wall?

Okay, back to the point.

WHAT"s NEXT?

Control of food supplies? COntrol of hot/cold water to our homes?

These bastards have no climate concerns in mind: They are merely tyrannical.

And we've got to stop this NOW! Because if we don't, who knows what's next.

I don't know what underlies the desire to control a nation's food supplies et al: If we find out, it would be helpful so they don't label us "conspiracy nuts" and dismiss the case being made.

I believe the case to be valid.

 "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants: It is the creed of slaves". ---Paul Revere, House of Commons

by Kathryn Smith (84 articles, 1 quicklinks, 33 diaries, 306 comments) on Sunday, January 13, 2008 at 2:56:14 PM
 


Yes, I was intentionally named by my father to honor Patrick Henry, a great American patriot and brilliant orator. Perhaps someday I will follow in his footsteps. For now, I am a full-time widget designer (mechanical engineer) and a part-time artist. Some say a picture is worth 1,000 words. I say a photograph can change lives and I aspire to achieve this level of art someday. If you feel the need to prejudge me: I am 28, male, caucasian, homosexual, libertarian, homeowner, middle-class, 5'1...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Patrick HenryYes, I was intentionally named by my father to honor Patrick Henry, a great American patriot and brilliant orator. Perhaps someday I will follow in his footsteps. For now, I am a full-time widget designer (mechanical engineer) and a part-time artist. Some say a picture is worth 1,000 words. I say a photograph can change lives and I aspire to achieve this level of art someday. If you feel the need to prejudge me: I am 28, male, caucasian, homosexual, libertarian, homeowner, middle-class, 5'1...

to see more of bio, click on member name

more of the same

although this is much worse because it invades personal privacy, it is somewhat similar to a bill last year in California which required faucet manufacturers to reduce the lead in faucets.  Of course it was purported to make people safer.  The reality however is that the majority of lead you ingest from drinking water comes not from the faucet, but from the ancient municipal infrastructure (old pipes, old valves).  of course, it was easier for California to force the issue onto private manufacturers and confuse the matter, rather than just fix what is wrong.

by Patrick Henry (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 46 comments) on Sunday, January 13, 2008 at 4:14:17 PM
 


I am concerned about the intentions of our elected leaders.
Stephen HartI am concerned about the intentions of our elected leaders.

A better way to reduce energy use.

I agree with you, Sandy, but not for the same reason. If taking away your personal freedom would make a significant dent in energy use, I would be all for it. But. like automobile CAFE standards, it won't work, and it will be a political football.

You touched on the solution, though, when you noted that California has steadily reduced its per-capita energy consumption. California ranked 4th lowest in energy consumption per capita in 1997. In 2003 it ranked lowest. The reason is pretty simple - your energy costs a lot more than most people's, and you have learned to respect it.

Higher costs lead to reductions. It is that simple. But higher prices through price gouging by energy producers will not be beneficial in the long term.

The way to reduce energy consumption without taking away people's ability to choose is to shift taxes away from more benign sources to energy use. Then, by paying something more representative of the true cost of energy, we would all begin respect it. Interestingly, this would give you Californians an advantage as the rest of us learn what you already understand.

by Stephen Hart (1 articles, 1 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 23 comments) on Monday, January 14, 2008 at 2:49:11 PM
 

 

6 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

24 hrs 48 hrs
72 hrs 1 week
1 month 6 months
1 year All Time
Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

GOP whistleblower names Karl Rove in Ohio's 04 election theft
by steveheller

Epilepsy Study Incriminates Aspartame in Medications
by Dr. GLEN MABSON, Phd. Epileptic Foundation of Maui dba Pacific Epilepsy Society

Bill C51 in Canada is a MAJOR WARNING to all of us. Fascism is coming in through food and health products.
by Linn Cohen-Cole

Dalai Lama: "I Love President Bush... but... Lack(s) Understanding of Reality"
by Rob Kall

You Say You Want a Revolution?
by Olga Bonfiglio

The Greatest Bank Robbery of the Century
by William Helbig

Excuse this interruption of deadly serious matters, to ask what you're packing for the internment camp stay.
by Linn Cohen-Cole

False Flag of Terror
by Kelly Mitchell

McCain to NY Times; Damn It My Friend, Can't You See? I Am Right, Obama's Wrong. Let Me Repeat...
by Rob Kall

Lieberman At Hagee Conference: U.S. Should Attack Iran because God Hates Israel's Enemies
by Gustav Wynn