Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Asterisks All Around

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Vin Scully. The Voice of the Dodgers. The Voice of Los Angeles. My hero!

It was the second night of the three-game series between the Dodgers and Giants and everybody was waiting breathlessly for Barry Bonds of the Giant to "not" break the all-time home run record.

As most everyone is well-aware, Barry Bonds isn't the most likeable guy in the world. The haughty, surly, smirking, aloof, drug-suspected athlete may go in the record books for homers hit, but not for being a nice guy, and certainly not a personality for young fans and future baseball players to emulate.

To add a little more venom to the mix, there's the rivalry between the Dodgers and the Giants. So, there we were gathered in front of the TV rooting for Bonds to be walked at every plate appearance, not wanting him to tie Hank Aaron's 755 lifetime home runs in L.A., even if it meant walking over the winning run.

It was better, in my mind for us to lose, than to have a Dodger pitcher take the fall for giving up that 755th homer.

Apparently, there were 52,000 fans in the stands who felt the same way, or there was a helluvah love-hate relationship between the fans and Bonds going on.

Only in L.A. could you have baseball fans give a player a standing "boovation," while at the same time snapping off hundred of pictures from their lofty perches in the stands.

Although Barry Bonds has allegedly broken the all-time home run record, I stand by my theory that nobody has broken George Herman "Babe" Ruth's career record. Ruth had a 714 homers during his career, and in 1927 one amazing achievement of 60 homes in a single season.

That was back in the day when the baseball season was far shorter. For that reason, no one can ever top Ruth's record unless they do it in the same number of games as The Babe or in as many at bats.

You can move the goal post and say yards rushing is the same, or change the height of the basket and have free throws records stand.

To say that a record is broken when the rules have change just isn't right, and is comparing apples to avocados. A runner couldn't break Roger Bannister's four-minute mile if suddenly a mile was changed from 5,280 feet to 4,280 feet.

Gertrude Ederly's record swim of the English Channel couldn't be broken if good old Mom Nature took a hand and narrowed the channel. It's ridiculous. Nor can you compare Ederly's swim to Florence Chadwick's, since Ederly swam the channel in one direction, while Chadwick did it both ways.

Then came Vinnie, riding in on the airwaves to vindicate my theory. They say there are lies, damn lies and then there are statistics. In all the years Scully's been in L.A. broadcasting games, I don't think there's a person who could ever accusing him of telling a lie -- not even a teensy-weensy fib. Scully is the man Diogenes was looking for.

The Dodgers statisticians decided to compare the apples and avocados. Using the number of "at bats" as the standard, they came up with numbers that say any hitter would have to hit well over a thousand homers to even approach Ruth's record.

So far nobody's done it. Not Roger Maris, Mickey Mantel, Hank Aaron, Sammy Sosa, Mark McGuire, and certainly not Barry Bonds...none of them.

Sorry guys -- and I'm a huge fan of some of you -- none of you have done it.

Some of the above mentioned players have been accused of taking steroids or other body-enhancing chemicals. We'll never know unless they make deathbed confessions. The drug controversy is just one more stain on the aging record book.

If the powers that be are going to call these "non-records," "records," then every one of them must have big black asterisks after them.

We do know that the only things Ruth had to fortify him were fast women, late nights, booze, nicotine and doughnuts.

If Ruth were playing today, he'd be in the Valley hitting all the nightspots and playing the next day with doughnuts stuffed in his pockets, and Vinnie would be there telling us Ruth has done it again.

That ball is outta here and on its way to Pasadena.

Babe Ruth. The Sultan of Swat. Vive le Sultan!

 

Sandy Sand began her writing career while raising three children and doing public relations work for Women's American ORT (Organization for Rehabilitation through Training). That led to a job as a reporter for the San Fernando Valley Chronicle, a (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

There are Only Three Qualifications to be President, Technically

Mystery: The Case of the Lost Schlossberg and the Found Clinton

Opinion: Distinguishing the Difference Between a News Story and an Editorial

Omigawd! Barack Obama Sparkled on "60 Minutes" Interview

A Call to Arms Against the Mormon Church. End Its Tax-exempt Status Now!

Rich Lowry on Boinking Palin ... in Thought Only

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
 Hot dogs. The Babe loved hot dogs too. ... by B York on Friday, Aug 10, 2007 at 9:31:36 AM
Ok, maybe you have a point with the at bat statist... by Robert Chapman on Friday, Aug 10, 2007 at 4:43:00 PM