Tags for This Article:

Reform (526)  Polls (382)  Caucus (141) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
January 3, 2008 at 07:48:24

Five Myths About the Iowa Caucuses

by Ryan O'Donnell     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Today, a unique American electoral event will shape one of the most contested presidential primaries in a generation. Steeped in political folklore, the Iowa caucuses conjure images of old-fashioned neighborhood meetings in high school gymnasiums. Iowa's reputation is also one of a kingmaker that has absolute authority to make or break candidates for our nation's highest office. But some of this reputation, like the following, ain't necessarily so.


1. "The winner of the nomination must win Iowa"



The candidates who beat expectations here do not necessarily have reason to re-chill the champagne left over from New Year's. History is full of contenders who lost the caucuses but won the nomination. George H.W. Bush ran far behind expectations when finishing third in 1988 behind Bob Dole and Pat Robertson, and Bill Clinton chose to skip the caucuses all together when he faced Iowa's Tom Harkin.

2. "The polls can call it"

In fact, not even the exit polls can call it. For Democrats, the point of the caucuses is delegates, not raw votes. Polls can mislead because any candidate who falls below 15% in a precinct won't win even one delegate, and finishing above this threshold doesn't guarantee more. The process hinges on the complexities of "caucus math," and the savvy of the precinct captains appointed by the campaigns.

An important factor seldom reported in horserace columns is second choices among Democrats. If after a first count, a candidate falls short of the 15% threshold, supporters have the sensible opportunity to reorganize and send their support to their second choices. This could matter for a candidate like John Edwards, who has wound up a close third in many polls, but often first among Iowans' second choices.


3. "To win, build the biggest crowds"


Caucus math matters. Because of the way delegates are spread out geographically, the candidate who wins the broadest support will likely triumph over the candidate who racks up lots of votes in populated areas, but falls short of 15% in others. Excitement and energy drives good caucus organizing, but awe-inspiring rallies alone will not translate into an equally impressive number of delegates statewide.


4. "No maneuvering or deal making here!"

By mastering the art of caucus math, campaigns can harm frontrunners by helping lower-tier candidates. Suppose that after a first count, John Edwards, Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama are the only viable candidates in a precinct, but Bill Richardson has fallen just short of a delegate. The delegate split is 2 for Edwards, 2 for Obama and 3 for Clinton. If Obama and Edwards supporters think strategically and have people to spare, they could move enough excess support to Richardson so he gains a delegate at Clinton's expense.

Outside effects can hold sway, too. The Orange Bowl will be held the same night on January 3, keeping some potential voters home. If a blizzards blows through, which voters will risk wintry driving?

5. "Iowa's schedule was set by God"

Bill Richardson suggested this summer that the first in the nation scheduling of Iowa was an act of God. In reality, it was an act of a somewhat less holy body – the Democratic Party's Commission on Party Structure and Delegate Selection in 1968, later to be headed by George McGovern. The Republican Party soon followed suit.

This year, with all the potential chaos surrounding the compressed primary schedule, the time for reform has come again. Nearly half the country will vote on "Tsunami Tuesday," (February 5), reflecting a widespread desire among the states to exercise a meaningful vote. Internal strife has erupted inside the parties themselves, as states like Michigan and Florida tangle with sanctions after they broke party rules.

The Rules Committee of the Republican Party is set to vote on January 17 to recommend a reform proposal such as the American Plan, Delaware Plan or rotating regional system. The Democratic Party shows every indication of wanting to take action as well. God (or party task forces) willing, sensible reform will be here by 2012's Orange Bowl.

More at www.FixThePrimaries.com

 

Ryan O'Donnell is Communications Director for FairVote - The Center for Voting and Democracy, a nonprofit, nonpartisan election reform group in Washington DC.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Currently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolvee.com
Mr MCurrently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolvee.com

Will any of this matter?

As I understand it the votes being cast are on the same kind of corruptible E-voting machines used in the general elections. If we can't count on them in the general elections, what makes anyone think the votes won't be corrupted in this primary?

 

by Mr M (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 1425 comments) on Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 2:28:05 PM
 


Politically, I lean Libertarian. When discussing issues, I will slam Dems and/or Republicans.

Now, when it comes to really irritating me, just make an unfounded charge; I will call out whomever makes the charge if there are no facts to back it up! Another version of this is when I see something that is just plainly silly/ridiculous.

An example could be something stated which could be very easily disproved. Another example, and I see this frequently: Rather tha...

to see more of bio, click on member name

steve scheetzPolitically, I lean Libertarian. When discussing issues, I will slam Dems and/or Republicans.

Now, when it comes to really irritating me, just make an unfounded charge; I will call out whomever makes the charge if there are no facts to back it up! Another version of this is when I see something that is just plainly silly/ridiculous.

An example could be something stated which could be very easily disproved. Another example, and I see this frequently: Rather tha...

to see more of bio, click on member name

I love this!

As soon as I read the title of this article, I knew what it was going to start saying... 

the candidate who was expected to be crowned in November was not going to be doing well at the polls, therefore, we have to come up with some excuse for her loss...

Well, it is all irrelevant, for the most part...  the Iowa Caucus is simply the first part of the election process.  

there are all sorts of deals being made..  for example..  Democrats have spent $200 PER VOTE for this...  particular exercise....

I am not about to do any sort of prediction, as to what any candidate will do in the nomination process, however...  In so saying, I will make a prediction about what will be seen in the news around the country tomorrow....

Hillary, despite the fact that she will come on 3rd, will be depicted the "winner" due to the fact that she was not trying to win Iowa..  (despite the fact that she spent $200 per vote)  

If not those stories, (of which there will be plenty)  there will be the ones excusing the loss with "Bill never won a primary till Georgia"  which is ALREADY being pushed by Bill clinton himself...

(which is already excusing the loss she will have in New Hampshire next week....) 

 Now, I will agree that it does not matter...  In fact the entire election does not matter...  We will see more of the same, because we, as a nation, will have the same big corporation whore living at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave that we have NOW.. Whether it is a republican whore or a democrat whore, it does not matter, not even a little bit...

 

Ciao, CZ 

by steve scheetz (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 587 comments) on Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 3:58:27 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

BARACK OBAMA On Gandhi's Birthday by Stephen Fox

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

PECK, PECK... SQUAWK! by Rip Rense

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

Naomi Wolf Must Watch Video: A Coup Took Place on October 1, 2008 by youtube

Sarah Palin; Secessionist-- powerful new Youtube Video by youtube

Sarah Palin Broke The Ethics Law In Alaska, And Can Be Impeached by Rev. Bill McGinnis

A Solution? by Paul Craig Roberts

Palin Guilty - Troopergate Witnesses & McCain Campaign Obstructed Justice by Steven Leser

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

Go To Top 50 Most Popular