Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
15 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

A Child's Guide to US-Iran Relations

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


opednews.com

There's no denying that Iran is an unsavory state. It funds Hezbollah. Its record on women's rights is abysmal. It hangs citizens -- including gay teens -- in public. Also, new evidence suggests that not Libya, but Iran, was responsible for the explosion of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie.

But, contrary to the administration's claims, no hard evidence exists that Iran ships arms to Iraq. Nor does the International Atomic Energy Agency believe it's capable of developing nuclear weapons in the foreseeable future. While only a fool would put such behavior past Iran, as pretexts for war they're at lest as threadbare as those the administration used on Iraq.

After all, why attack Iran now when we didn't in response to more obvious offenses, such as the hostage crisis, the Marine Barracks bombing or Hezbollah's campaign against Israel in Lebanon?

Recently noted analyst Gareth Porter cited a paper called "Rebuilding America's Defenses." Written in 2000, it served as the Neocons' blueprint for the Bush administration's military policy.

They actually admitted that Iran was "more the status quo power" –- in other words, no real threat. Then why obsess about Iran? It seems, Porter quotes the paper, that it wasn't the nukes so much as the "constraining effect" a nuclear Iran would have on the administration's plans for regional transformation.

They expect to achieve said transformation by means of another Neocon catch phrase. "Regime change" though, as Peter Galbraith writes, is "identified with the most discredited part of the Iranian opposition and unwanted by the reformers who have the most appeal to Iranians." Of course, neither can anyone come up with an example of bombing driving out a country's rulers.

In fact, it would require sending in troops on the ground to usher Mahmoud and the ruling mullahs out. Shades of Operation Eagle Claw (the star-crossed attempt to rescue the American hostages in 1980).

Why did Iran impose the Great Embassy Embarrassment on us anyway? What triggered it, if you'll recall, was our decision to admit the deposed Shah into the US for cancer treatment. But the US and Iran have a longer history.

You remember history. It's that stuff that those who don't remember it should and those who remember it too much shouldn't.

The US and Iran's mutual history –- all history, in fact –- can be broken down to two basic grievances that even a child can understand. In other words: He hit me first and it's not fair.

In 1952, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now BP) controlled oil in Iran. At 85% British and 15% Iranian ownership, it sounds like a model for the arrangement the US seeks with Iraq. Worse, the British sought to further leverage their advantage by withholding their financial records from the Iranian government.

In response, Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammed Mossadeq, nationalized the company -- just Iran's 15%, though. That didn't stop the United States, which stood to benefit from Britain's hand in the Iranian till, from organizing protests to overthrow Mossadeq.

Once reinstated, our designated despot, the Shah, made his country safe for the West again. Today the administration expects Iranians to accept on faith that democracy will break out in the wake of regime change. But we forget that the rest of the world doesn't have as short a memory as us. It was only 50 years that we nipped Iran's democracy in the bud.

In other words, it's obvious who hit who first.

Unjust as that was, another element of Iran-U.S. relations is even more likely to elicit that plaintive cry no parent is spared: "It's not fair." In the words of Iran's President Ahmadinejad, "Justice demands that those who want to hold talks with us shut down their nuclear fuel cycle program too. Then, we can hold dialogue under a fair atmosphere." [Emphasis added.]

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Russ Wellen is the nuclear deproliferation editor for OpEdNews. He's also on the staffs of Freezerbox and Scholars & Rogues.

"It's more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Foxy Knoxy and the Case of the Honorary Missing White Woman

You All Know Hanoi Jane, Now Meet Tehran Todd

School, Mall and Workplace Shootings: Why So Many?

Is a Preemptive Strike Ever Justified?

Michael Vick: Adding Insult to Black People's Injury

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

'Most obscene Bully' of all time is.......... by richard on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 12:23:20 PM
Gotta hand it to the Bushies for ever so convenien... by Sandy Sand on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 1:38:40 PM
click here... by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 1:41:10 PM
Oversimplified? I'd say quite the opposite.... by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 1:50:26 PM
 I think Iran should have nuclear power and t... by Dom Jermano on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 2:42:52 PM
"If America provided more money to create alt... by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:31:50 PM
Sorry friend, but overthrowing a country's dem... by bramdean on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 5:27:22 PM
that those are not the relationships between peopl... by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 7:04:32 PM
America's goons have been responsible for the ... by richard on Thursday, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:09:04 AM
Congress better grow some balls and stop this esca... by Michael Chavers on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 7:28:27 PM
And I see that Joseph Lieberman's bill to atta... by ibrahim turner on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:30:42 PM
"A few articles on the Internet, and even hun... by Russ Wellen on Thursday, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:38:12 PM
You're right -- doesn't help. Neither, app... by ibrahim turner on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 12:55:49 AM
When the s**t hits the fan, the troops in Iraq wil... by ibrahim turner on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 1:13:49 AM
or whatever they are called. Remember those anonam... by ibrahim turner on Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 at 1:25:15 AM