OpEdNews Op Eds

Remember Jesus Freaks?

By       Message Russ Wellen     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 129
- Advertisement -

Has any American death in recent years been greeted with more jubilation than Jerry Falwell's? (Aside from Timothy McVeigh's.)

Christopher Hitchens called him an "ugly little charlatan." Journalist and historian Rick Perlstein said, "He was of course a monster." Amanda Marcotte, who gained notoriety blogging for the John Edwards campaign, wrote: "The gates of hell swing open and Satan welcomes his beloved son."

Ms. Marcotte's sentiments are variations on a theme expressed in countless blogs and their comments: "Rot in hell, Falwell." Conservatives and fundamentalists, of course, blanched.

Sure, it's disrespectful of the dead. But to progressives and the LBG community, revisiting Falwell's tawdry history can be another important step in dismantling Christianism, Christianity's equivalent to Islamism, which seeks to superimpose religion on the state.

It began with that national embarrassment, the Terry Schiavo affair, and was given a boost by the disgracing of Ted Haggard. Now we think we've found a way to use Falwell's death to expedite the process even further. Why not dust off that old phrase "Jesus Freaks" and slap it on today's fundamentalists?

Technically, it doesn't apply because that's what members of the Jesus Movement, a byproduct of the sixties counterculture, were called -- and later called themselves. But as it waned, along with the counterculture, many of its members were folded into mainstream Christianity.

However, unlike today's fundamentalists, such as Falwell, Pat Robertson and James Dobson, who seek to impose a kind of Christian sharia (Muslim law) on the state, the original Jesus Freaks were innocuous. The mindlessness they shared with a similar phenomenon, the Hare Krishna crew, made them objects of derision.

- Advertisement -

Jesus Freaks were not only the fan, or devotee, kind of freaks, they were the round-peg-in-a-square-hole kind who don't fit into the culture at large. Yet today's fundamentalists are even more authentic in their freak-dom. In fact, they're mutants. (No letters or emails, please.)

But what would Jesus call them? Or, more to the point, how would he react to today's fundamentalists who consider their doctrines in-Falwell-ible?

To find out, let's summon up an expression of the utmost sorrow from the Bible. If you're Irish -- or a fan of Hellraiser -- you know it well: "Jesus wept."

But first, let's change the tense from past to present. Then, when Falwell, engorged with entitlement as ever, shows up at the pearly gates, what happens?

"Jesus freaks."

- Advertisement -

 

Russ Wellen is the nuclear deproliferation editor for OpEdNews. He's also on the staffs of Freezerbox and Scholars & Rogues.

"It's hard to tell people not to smoke when you have (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Foxy Knoxy and the Case of the Honorary Missing White Woman

You All Know Hanoi Jane, Now Meet Tehran Todd

School, Mall and Workplace Shootings: Why So Many?

Is a Preemptive Strike Ever Justified?

Surf-veying the Progressive Web

Michael Vick: Adding Insult to Black People's Injury