Tags for This Article:

Iraq (5132)  Military (2805)  Iran (2397)  Israel (1395)  Peace (1309)  Peace (1243)  Pentagon (1000)  Terrorism (889)  Money (781)  Israel-Palestinian Conflict (539)  Weapons (530)  Israeli Lebanon Conflict (387)  Discrimination (288)  Syria (197)  Israel-Palestine (190)  Taxpayers (171)  Gaza (155)  Lebanon (108) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
August 7, 2007 at 07:20:11

A Modest Proposal: U.S. Statehood for Israel?

by Rosa Schmidt Azadi     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

I’m only half kidding.

Just think of the possibilities. Making Israel the 51st U.S. state could be a win-win-win solution for our country, for Israel, and for Middle East peace. The way I see it, Israel’s security would get a boost at a lower cost to the U.S. taxpayer, and the biggest cause of conflict in the Middle East would be resolved, reducing the threat of terrorism.

Stay with me on this for a minute.

Improving security in Israel.

We’re supplying Israel with billions of dollars in weaponry and we look like their only friend at the United Nations. Right? This is supposedly to defend them from attack by their sworn enemies, who are legion. Many Americans have a deep emotional commitment to the people in Israel and so we are bending over backward to protect them from threats both real and perceived.

But if Israel were the 51st state of the USA, things would be different. I doubt anyone would seriously attack the world’s only superpower. Every state is defended by the U.S. armed forces, which we’re already funding out of our tax dollars, and the United States has plenty of missiles and spy satellites. Plenty enough to watch over the newest state as well as all 50 others.

Israel is too far from the U.S. to feel protected, you say? Well, if Japan was betting on Hawaii being too far from the “contiguous United States” when they attacked Pearl Harbor, they had another think coming.

Imagine this, too. Once Israel became a state they would officially benefit from the services of the CIA and wouldn’t need their own spy agency (Mossad) anymore. That would be a relief to Americans who were so disappointed to hear that Israeli agents had spied on the U.S. and deceptively lobbied Congress. Also, what a relief it would be to hear no more rumors about how Mossad was secretly behind an unrealistic number of dastardly deeds in an unrealistic number of locations all over the world. (These rumors are not helping the struggle against anti-semitism.)

Saving U.S. taxpayers money.

If Israel were a state, we wouldn’t need to give them billions of our hard-earned dollars in military aid every year any more than we had to send the governor of Alaska billions of dollars to defend his state from the nearby USSR during the Cold War.

As a bonus to the U.S. bottom line, individuals and businesses in Israel would pay into the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) like everyone else who receives the protection of the U.S. Defense and State Departments. And they'd also benefit from the services of all the other federal agencies.

Promoting peace in the Middle East (and reducing terrorism).

Statehood is not just about Israel’s security and U.S. taxpayers’ comfort, though. Think how Israeli statehood might benefit the peace process and Middle East peace in general. This would help reduce terrorism.

First, Israel’s borders and land disputes would have to be settled before statehood could be granted, and naturally the U.S. would be interested in getting the best possible bargain. Other countries would also weigh in with their opinions and help mediate. This might be the perfect chance to offer compensation or repatriation to dispossessed Palestinian refugees. With an ultimate prize so big, the price would be worth it, and Israel wouldn’t have to worry about paying the cost all alone.

Second, we probably wouldn’t hear many complaints from the Palestinians and Arab Israelis about discrimination or “apartheid” after Israel joins the United States. Why? Because Israel’s state legislature would have to abide by the U.S. Constitution in its guarantee of religious freedom, separation of church and state, and equal civil/legal rights to all residents. We could also expect to see a sharp drop in terrorist recruitment as conditions improve.

Third, and equally important, transforming Israel from a major military power into one of 51 states in the USA would go a long way toward stabilizing the region. Neighboring countries would understand that, just as the Texas State National Guard cannot on their own authority attack Tijuana and the New York State National Guard cannot attack Montreal, the Israel State National Guard (which would replace the Israeli Defense Force) couldn't launch preemptive strikes into towns in the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, or Iran. And that would mean we U.S. taxpayers wouldn’t have to “balance” the billions in military aid we send to Israel with yet more billions in military aid to Israel’s neighbors. Nor would we have to worry about being drawn into conflagrations that we don’t want and that Congress wouldn’t approve if they knew about them in advance (e.g., bombing Iran).

 1  |  2

 

Rosa Schmidt is an American married to an Iranian, hence the second last name, Azadi.  She's a long-time peace activist with a background in anthropology, education, and public health.  She's also one of the people who walked away from the falling Twin Towers on 9/11 and returned to help with the recovery effort.  Out of this experience of destruction, death, and horror came a deeper commitment to human life everywhere and specifically to non-violence.  Retired and splitting her time between rural New York and urban Iran, Rosa Schmidt is doing all she can to promote world peace. 

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 comments

A writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and forth, takes a peep at the leader, honks a little bit from behind, distracts everyone and writes on what he sees. Time passes and as he wants to return back to his place he discovers someone else there. Thus he either has to wait until they land for rest...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Mark SashineA writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and forth, takes a peep at the leader, honks a little bit from behind, distracts everyone and writes on what he sees. Time passes and as he wants to return back to his place he discovers someone else there. Thus he either has to wait until they land for rest...

to see more of bio, click on member name

nice perspective

Oh, well Israelis  need at least to  petition for  becoming a state and  it is very doubtful they will do that.  You also had forgotten that  if they become a 51st state they would need to adopt English as a  main language or else...  Also, the perspective of  suddenly  the Israeli Prime- Minister  becoming a Governor, IDF becoming Israeli national guard ( with subsequent deployment to  Iraq) and also IRS! OMG ( I mean Jewish God here), I sincerely doubt that the Israeli elite would abide to the IRS scrutiny.  I guess the same problem will be with Habad Jews in Israel  because within the US they would have to work for living. So..many problems, see?

 

by Mark Sashine (46 articles, 19 quicklinks, 235 diaries, 3358 comments) on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 8:39:02 AM
 


Geery lived off the grid for 15 years in an earth-sheltered, solar heated home, while his kids learned in school that solar energy isn't feasible. NAPTA hosts a page on Geery's foibles in education, and explains how he got his butt fired from a tenured teaching position. Here's a short clip of his most recent solar contraption; for more on that project, and Geery's contention that the Wright Brothers took a wrong turn, please visit his airship page (hyperblimp.com). Apparently, Geery is the only...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Daniel GeeryGeery lived off the grid for 15 years in an earth-sheltered, solar heated home, while his kids learned in school that solar energy isn't feasible. NAPTA hosts a page on Geery's foibles in education, and explains how he got his butt fired from a tenured teaching position. Here's a short clip of his most recent solar contraption; for more on that project, and Geery's contention that the Wright Brothers took a wrong turn, please visit his airship page (hyperblimp.com). Apparently, Geery is the only...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Good idea

And while we're at it, let's add Palestine, Pakistan, Russia, and China.  Seriously.

In fact, let's make every country a state.  That way we won't have all these border problems, resource issues, illegal aliens, global trade hassles, pollution from other countries, U.N. fiascos, and so on.

I mean, we are one species.  Aren't we?

by Daniel Geery (26 articles, 58 quicklinks, 121 diaries, 677 comments) on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 10:21:47 AM
 



Evelyn

A nice idea

One other benefit to this modest proposal is that Palestinians could all become US citizens. Many of the world's underprivileged go to a great deal of trouble to emigrate to the US, but all that would be eliminated. They could stay in their ancestral land and still be US citizens. Many Israelis already have dual citizenship in the US and Israel, so this would also clarify their status. I like it. I don't expect it, but I like it.

by Evelyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 8 comments) on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 11:30:47 AM
 


57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Andris57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

nice idea?

The problem with the Israeli/Palisinian conflict is that the israelis appropriated/confiscated the palistinian lands. Many of the 'refugees' have titlesto land israeli occupy. In fact the US embassy is located on just such a piece of land. The injustices even by the Israeli government to its Arab citizens are stunning.

Most of these Palistinians that come to US do so to better them selves, 3 squares not being shot at and basic services. Making 3million of them US citizens would do what? the area would still be in poverty.. all the good land has been appropriated. Then there's the problem of all the refugee Palistinians in Lebanon, Syria, Iran es sec.

How would you stop them from migrating to the US mainland? two class citizens?

Would you really want to import the Israeli prejudices "God gave us this land" how would legitimize this ?  Their whole ethos is built on superiority (they believe they are God's chosen people). would you want legitimize all this? The claims for compensation would clog courts  for decades. Do really believe the Israelis would give up stolen  land to the Palistinians? The animosity  on both side wouldn't simply vanish? Both sides have histories of  brutal urban terrorism and extremism. It is a naive silly idea.

And as I have  already stated it wouldn't help it would alienate the other Arab states and a war would suit no one. One nuke against Americans would spoil your whole day.

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 532 comments) on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 6:26:23 PM
 


Male Nurse , married with two children still at home.  Neither of which will go to fight an illegal war for Bush .
MarkMale Nurse , married with two children still at home.  Neither of which will go to fight an illegal war for Bush .

Isreal as a State

Nice proposal but several things come to mind. First of all Mossad will not cooperate with the CIA. They have their own entrenched power & will not give it up. Second, George Bush will not abide by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty so why would Isreal? We would still have to give them billions of dollars because Isreal could not exsist without it. Also, George Bush will never agree to give Palestinian land back because he is a right-wing christian counting on the final conflect to take place in Isreal to bring about the second coming. I am a Christian also, but realize that peace on earth will never be won as long as Bush is president.

by Mark (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 12:15:20 PM
 


Kathlyn Stone is a Minnesota-based writer covering science and medicine, health care and related policies. She publishes www.fleshandstone.net, a health and science news site.
Kathlyn StoneKathlyn Stone is a Minnesota-based writer covering science and medicine, health care and related policies. She publishes www.fleshandstone.net, a health and science news site.

Please make your comment without personal attacks.

It is clear to me the Rosa did give a lot of thought to writing this article.

You can call her idea wild, unorthodox, pie-in-the sky, but you can't call it or her stupid.

Resorting to name calling and implying someone is ignorant just because you disagree with them does not change minds. It makes them stop listening to you.

by Kathlyn Stone (34 articles, 209 quicklinks, 22 diaries, 577 comments) on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 2:43:18 PM
 


57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Andris57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

US Statehood ??

To even contemplate Israel as a state displays an incredible lack of knowledge and an unbelieveable arrogance about the power of the US.

Terrorism if you call it that would continue and  Israel's statehood would invite it to the mainland wholesale. If it didn't cause complete chaos in the Middle East it would start the next world war. Nostradamus' predictions would come true. !000 years of peace but at what cost.

If you could some how get past the Israeli own resistance jingoism, religious extremeism perhaps.

Finally the idea that no one would "dare attack the most powerful nation on earth"....do you read the papers? The US heirarchy is still trying to fight  1940 type wars. ie set piece hardware/troops vesus troops and are failing against the asymetric wars. Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and now Iraq.

Of course The US would get attacked  and by more groups than you've got congresspersons. In stead of the occasional spectacular instance you'd have down town Bagdad in NY, LA, Washington and Galloping Falls where ever. The game has changed, tragically the US political and military leadership are behind the play.

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 532 comments) on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 5:58:12 PM
 


Rob Kall is executive editor and publisher of OpEdNews.com, President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com. He is a frequent Speaker on Politics, Impeachment, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates. He recently retired as o...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Rob KallRob Kall is executive editor and publisher of OpEdNews.com, President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com. He is a frequent Speaker on Politics, Impeachment, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates. He recently retired as o...

to see more of bio, click on member name

What a thought

I love the take several commenters took, that it could be the beginning of all states being equal and together. Then there are those who use any opportunity to lean antisemitic. To those I say, get a life. Sure, there are fundamentalist Jews who buy the bible crap about being God's chosen, just as there are fundamentalists in the Christian and Muslim faiths, who are extremists.  But characterizign all Jews that way.... well, duh!!! Narrow thinking and vision, if not hate speech.

by Rob Kall (748 articles, 3833 quicklinks, 320 diaries, 1610 comments) on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 10:48:02 PM
 


Brett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.
Brett PaatschBrett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.

Idea has some merit

Actually I think a United States of the World is probably inevitable if humanity doesn't wipe itself out first because one environment will require cohesive management or stewardship if you prefer.

The real contest is between democracy and capitalism.  Capitalism isn't in the extending human rights business.

I also think that it is likely that the only way government of the people by the people for the people will work is if all the worlds people are represented.  Politicians aren't in the business of representing non-voting foreigners. Nor facing elections every four years are they long term thinkers. 

America is not headed in the direction of being a hub and adding states.  It is heading in the direction of being the place where the wealthy live under the protections of the bill of rights and use it as a base to acquire wealth on the global market.  America is becoming not a democracy but a plutocracy (if it isn't already) and extending rights to non-Americans goes against all the trends in recent lawmaking and foreign policy. Foreigners are for exploiting.

United States Presidents are effectively above all laws now with respect to what they can do to non-citizens.  (Habeas Corpus, extraordinary rendition, unsigning the International Criminal Court). Add the Presidential power to pardon their supporters and the US Presidency is something that corporations will come to see as a strategic asset. 

by Brett Paatsch (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 21 diaries, 953 comments) on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 at 12:27:20 AM
 


Been around the block a few times.
Blue PilgrimBeen around the block a few times.

Not a good idea for several reasons

One is that Israel is not "America", and the US has enough trouble just running itself. The idea is based on the presumption that it's a good thing to be part of the US -- which is becoming increasingly apparent is not a good thing. No, I don't think the US shold, like the Blob which ate New York, should take over the world, or become anymore of an empire that it already tried to be. And, of course, the cultural gap is quite wide, and would cause many problems.

Another problem is that there are too many zionists in Israel -- as there are in the US, and that's bad for Judaism. Zionists are arguably the most anti-semitic group -- anti-Judaism -- that has emerged since the Nazis. They undermine the most important principles of Judaism as much as Bush undermines the principles of America, and John Hagee and Pat Robertson undermine the principles of Christianity, and the neocons undermine the principles of conservatism. These people make me ashamed of those parts of me which are Jewish, American, and Christian. They even make me ashamed to call myself human.

It would be terrible for the Palestinians -- already suffering from the US anti-Palestinian and anti-Muslim attitudes and policies -- such as the recent coup by Fatah against the democrqticaly elected Hamas government by the US and Israel, and the crimes against humanity in Gaza. To think the US government would protect a class of people from discrimination is to forget the American Indians, the Blacks, and numerous other groups.

No -- America is hardly a nation capable of managing a state or a nation -- even it's own.

by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 998 comments) on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 at 2:09:27 AM
 


Rosa Schmidt is an American married to an Iranian, hence the second last name, Azadi.  She's a long-time peace activist with a background in anthropology, education, and public health.  She's also one of the people who walked away from the falling Twin Towers on 9/11 and returned to help with the recovery effort.  Out of this experience of destruction, death, and horror came a deeper commitment to human life everywhere and specifically to non-violence.  Retired and sp...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Rosa Schmidt AzadiRosa Schmidt is an American married to an Iranian, hence the second last name, Azadi.  She's a long-time peace activist with a background in anthropology, education, and public health.  She's also one of the people who walked away from the falling Twin Towers on 9/11 and returned to help with the recovery effort.  Out of this experience of destruction, death, and horror came a deeper commitment to human life everywhere and specifically to non-violence.  Retired and sp...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Thanks for the comments

I was really curious how people would respond to this article. I guess it was read, and maybe people thought about some of the issues and contradictions. I hope so. Anyway, my "ethnic-terrorist" husband (just a little joke about racial profiling--he's actually pacifist-oriented like me) and I read the earliest comments aloud together with delight and laughter, and I thank everyone who responded, those who responded with tongue in cheek and those who responded in a more serious manner.

I had hoped some folks would think about the role played in the Middle East by the US as well as the best-supporting-actress role played by Israel. Most comments talked only about Israel. Oh well. Maybe that's what I get for letting the article run over onto a second page. Or maybe I was too subtle.

I'm a New Yorker, so the US relationship with Israel is something I have to think about a lot. Emotional defensiveness about the unusual relationship seems to be a huge stumbling block for the peace movement. Nobody seems to have found a solution to the bad to worse to hellish situation we've contributed to creating in the Middle East, much less a win-win-win solution, and neither have I. But I know that we must.

Rosa 

by Rosa Schmidt Azadi (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 50 comments) on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 at 3:45:40 PM
 


Brett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.
Brett PaatschBrett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.

There are some really good things about America

and some Americans Rosa.

It might take a thousand years to get a United States of the World if humanity has to keep doing it the hard way but the intellectual lessons learned aren't forgotted by everyone.  

Even if the United States did not exist, the US Constitution would still exist as a intellectual and historical construct. As a prototype. Even if the UN goes the way of the League of Nations some people somewhere will learn and be ready to rebuild.

There is absolutely no possibility of America conquering the whole world by force of arms but if American citizens could just walk their talk there might be a possibility of America leading the world by example.  Good ideas, values and friendships can be welcomed where armies of conquerors aren't.

No United States of the World nor any United States of America would be worth living in if citizens aren't free to improve themselves and their human condition on their merits though.  Rule of law will always matter or there will inevitably be war on some scale and as long as some people are chosen to represent other people in government and so placed by those other people in positions of trust then oaths of office will have to treated solemnly and seriously. 

No it is not a serious proposition for Israel to be another state of the USA today. But it is a very serious proposition that all states and all people will sooner or later co-exist under a global umbrella with regional differences as US states have differences.  Perhaps if the US turns into a forth reich, then in a thousand years or so when ancient historians are telling stories of America it will be China or Europe that is the hub of global civilization rather than America. Perhaps Iran or Pakistan? Imagine what the US would be like if your bill of rights was being used to protect citizens living in states that were strongly and predominantly muslim in composition. 

by Brett Paatsch (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 21 diaries, 953 comments) on Thursday, August 9, 2007 at 1:13:29 AM
 


Author of four books, part-time college professor, Ph.D American history Carnegie Mellon University.Graduate work in Clark University, Gratz College of Jewish studies.
philip rosenAuthor of four books, part-time college professor, Ph.D American history Carnegie Mellon University.Graduate work in Clark University, Gratz College of Jewish studies.

51st state

Another bash Israel blog. Arabs attacking Arabs are the biggest cause of conflict in Middle East. Do you read the papers? Were there no Israel Sunnis and Shites would fight, Fatah and Hamas would fight. Kurds and Turks, Lebanon Army and terrorists, terrorists in Arabia and Bandar government etc.

I wish our CIA, which let us down 9/11, were as good as Mossad.

You bash Israel types never want Israel to defend itself.

by philip rosen (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 93 comments) on Friday, August 10, 2007 at 1:24:52 PM
 


Rosa Schmidt is an American married to an Iranian, hence the second last name, Azadi.  She's a long-time peace activist with a background in anthropology, education, and public health.  She's also one of the people who walked away from the falling Twin Towers on 9/11 and returned to help with the recovery effort.  Out of this experience of destruction, death, and horror came a deeper commitment to human life everywhere and specifically to non-violence.  Retired and sp...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Rosa Schmidt AzadiRosa Schmidt is an American married to an Iranian, hence the second last name, Azadi.  She's a long-time peace activist with a background in anthropology, education, and public health.  She's also one of the people who walked away from the falling Twin Towers on 9/11 and returned to help with the recovery effort.  Out of this experience of destruction, death, and horror came a deeper commitment to human life everywhere and specifically to non-violence.  Retired and sp...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Why not write an article and try to prove those assertions?

May I suggest that you write a serious article in which you try to document that Israel has nothing to do with violence in the Middle East? 

This is not the first time I've heard people assert that local groups of Arabs, Kurds, Turks, etc. have been fighting each other for centuries, that all these Middle Eastern people are basically a hopeless and violent crew.  According to that line of thinking , poor Israel just unfortunately moved into a violent neighborhood and is trying to keep a low profile. And I guess poor America is trying to be a neutral referee.

But I think these broad statements about Middle Easterners are fabricated as an excuse for what the US and Israel are actually doing to control and exploit the region.  Nobody wants to have a bad conscience, do we? 

In my assessment, "divide and rule" is a technique that both the US and Israel have used to try to control the Middle East.  As often as not they've stirred up rivalries and pitted neighbors against neighbors (e.g., Hamas vs. Fatah, Lebanese Muslims vs. Lebanese Christians, Arabs vs. Iranians, Iranian Kurds and Baluchis vs. other Iranians, and perhaps even Iraqi Shia vs. Iraqi Sunni). 

If I'm wrong, you'll be able to prove it with historical documentation.

by Rosa Schmidt Azadi (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 50 comments) on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 at 4:05:01 AM
 


John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog:
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

johndoraemiJohn Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog:
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

Rewarding Aggression is Illegal

My problem with this and most mainstream "solutions" to the "Palestinian problem" is that it rewards Israeli aggression, and that is morally wrong.  It's also illegal under the UN Charter, but that didn't prevent the creation of the state of Israel in the first place, despite the terrorism and military atrocities that drove out the Palestinians in 1948.

This is an historic wrong, a monumental crime that approaches genocide over these last sixty years.  Israeli leaders have attempted to erase Palestine from existence, claiming among other absurdities, that the land was "without a people", a clear lie.

Not that America hadn't committed the same crimes, as in the genocide of the native tribes across the continent.  But, now with the age of "international law" and the signing and ratification of the UN Charter, these things are clearly, in black and white, unlawful crimes that cannot be rewarded, as this article proposes.  I don't see the adding of Israel as a US state to be anything other than a reward for Israel, for it's outright criminal and genocidal behavior.

To stand against Israeli ambitions makes one an "anti-semite" as you can see in this thread.  So be it.  I stand against Israel.  Against apartheid.  Against the genocide of the Palestinians.  I don't want a single, solitary penny of our taxes sent to that criminal regime which actively corrupts my own government here in the US.

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog
crimesofthestate.blogspot.com
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by johndoraemi (17 articles, 12 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 170 comments) on Friday, August 17, 2007 at 11:51:44 PM
 

 

19 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

"Welcome, Rich White Oligarchs!" --Daily Show Billboard Greets Republicans In Minnesota Posted by Rob Kall

Why I Won't Vote for John McCain by Phillip Butler

Carville is a Spy for Bush Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Howard Zinn's Advice to Obama by Rob Kall

McCrash: McCain's Military Record Revisited by Hill Kemp

The Rise and Fall of the US Dollar as the The World Reserve by John Little

"Now, This!" by Stephen Pizzo

Virgo New Moon, August 30, 2008 by C.L. Pagano

Torture As Official Israeli Policy by Stephen Lendman

Got a Traffic Ticket in the Mail for a Right on Red at an Automated Enforcement Light? by Tumerica

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months