Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Trampling American Empire

By       Message Ron Fullwood     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -
With wonderful deathless ditties
We build up the world's great cities,
And out of a fabulous story
We fashion an empire's glory:
One man with a dream, at pleasure,
Shall go forth and conquer a crown;
And three with a new song's measure
Can trample an empire down. -- O'Shaughnessy



The U.S. military oligarchy, empowered by their purchased figurehead in the Oval office, has never been more transparent about their quest to revive and expand the Faustian patronage of American empire. To secure their colonialist plunder in Iraq and firmly establish their new U.S. satellite, the Bush regime is laying the groundwork for reloading and reinvigorating the military protection scheme that once gave NATO its relevance after WWII, codifying the imperialism of American hegemony with the collective destructive threat of its massive arsenals.

The Pentagon is looking for Congress to give them the key to the Treasury to flood the Middle East with compromising gifts of weapons and armaments to compliant countries and regimes to counter the 'threat' they've contrived out of Iran's apparent enrichment an insignificant amount of uranium. Their siren song has the same self-serving stanzas that lured legislators, after the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, into allowing the rape of the Treasury for 'emergency' appropriations and covert funding, approved in secret sessions under the seemingly unassailable guise of 'national security'.

The Bush regime is insisting to the world that Iran, with their infant nuclear program, poses a threat to its neighbors, against which the U.S. is duty-bound to lead an international defense, notwithstanding the lack of any proof at all that Iran has actually threatened anyone outside of defense of their own borders. They are set to convince Congress to give them $1.6b for the establishment of an 'anti-missile' base in Eastern Europe to defend against, what they claim, is a threat to the region from Iran's ballistic missiles.

Under consideration are sites in countries like Poland and the Czech Republic. Their rationale for these sites is for a wall of defense against missiles aimed at other countries in Europe, or even farther, the United States. I wonder if anyone in Congress will consider that Iran has no intercontinental missiles. Of course, we have no way of knowing what Iran is doing in those fictional underground labs that were conjured-up to justify the need for the Bush regime's new nuclear bunker-busters. Perhaps Bush can conjure a intercontinental missile program there also.

Iran doesn't have to be anything more than steamed at this point, as the present U.S. missile defense boondoggle hasn't produced anything that works, much less any system that threatens. But, countries like Russia will understandably prick up their ears at the sound of American empire's siren song.

The prospect of nations like Poland and the Czech Republic aligning with the U.S against Russia's economic ally is bound to be seen as an affront; a step back from the cooperation that marked the security agreements made between Russia and NATO after Sept.11. The U.S. and Russia generally cooperate in Afghanistan, Serbia and Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia. Whatever consensus there may have been on the Middle East has been damaged by Russia's objections to the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

The Bush regime's militarism hearkens back to the Cold War and reminds Russia that the original mission of NATO was to resist the expansion and influence of the former Soviet Union. The emergence of the newly-independent states was an opportunity for the U.S. to expand their own influence in Europe through the patronage of their coddled military industry. Now, Bush imperialism is a mockery of the underlying principles of the cooperation among nations that would serve to restrain the imperialist ambitions of militarily powerful countries against the lesser-equipped ones.
- Advertisement -


The United States spends an estimated $120b a year on its NATO commitment to defend Europe. One of the advocates for the NATO protection scheme was Bruce Jackson, former Vice President for Strategy and Planning at Lockheed Martin. Jackson was the founder and president of the Project on Transitional Democracy, an organization which guided 'newly independent', former Soviet provinces through the congressional appropriations process to connect the foreign leaders with U.S. tax dollars. His influence led to the acceptance of many of these countries into NATO compliance and membership. The introduction of these former provinces into the NATO resulted in a boon for weapon's manufacturers as the new republics were required to modernize their military forces to comply with NATO defense requirements.

Former Lockheed secretary, Bruce Jackson and former Lockheed counsel, National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley worked closely together on the Committee to Expand NATO. Jackson was president of this entity, based in the Washington offices of the right-wing American Enterprise Institute; Hadley was its secretary.

U.S. ambassador to NATO, Nicholas Burns explained Jackson's role to the Dallas Morning News in 2002: "In Europe, he coaches officials of candidate countries on whom to see, what to say and how to behave in Washington. He also browbeats them on what reforms they need to make and what issues they must address, such as lingering anti-Semitism, if they expect the Senate to let them into NATO."

These days it's anti-Iranism which is required for membership in the new Pentagon patronage club. Their current funnel for inserting defense dollars into compliant foreign states is the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. The head of the agency, Air Force Lt Gen. Jeffrey Kohler, in a Reuters article this week, boasted about the organization's $10.6b in U.S. government arms sales last year and the approval of about about $13b this year.

DSCA programs facilitate the transfer of defense articles and services to international organizations and 'friendly' foreign governments via sales, grants, leases, or loans'. That includes the delivery of defense weapon systems to foreign governments, U.S. Service school training to international students, U.S. personnel advice to other governments on their internal defense, and other materials and mechanizations which support U.S. military muckraking and meddling abroad.
- Advertisement -


The Secretary of State provides the supervision and management for the military protection racket, including determining whether what programs a given country will have, as well as their scope and content. The Secretary of Defense implements the patronage programs, handing over defense articles and services to our purchased allies.

"Our job is not to rack up sales," Gen. Kohler was quoted as saying. "Our job is to help people get the capabilities they need."

Asked about which countries were the focus of sales, he said: "Let 's just say everybody that is not Iran."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Ron Fullwood, is an activist from Columbia, Md. and the author of the book 'Power of Mischief' : Military Industry Executives are Making Bush Policy and the Country is Paying the Price

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

John McCain Stands With Bigots and Racists

Further Down That Bloody Path In Iraq

Calling the Bluff on the Limits of American Power and Influence

What's Really Going On In Space?

Allowing China a Dominant Role in Afghanistan's Future

Bush's Enduring Militarism in Iraq