Tags for This Article:

Rights (1326)  Protest (395)  Time (387)  Murder (284)  Murder (267)  Will (186)  Boycott (72) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 7, 2008 at 12:43:40

Promoted to column top on 4/7/08:
RELOCATE OLYMPIC GAMES, DON'T BOYCOTT

by Robert Weiner     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

RELOCATE OLYMPIC GAMES, DON’T BOYCOTT--

MESSAGE TO CHINA THAT TIBET MURDERS UNACCEPTABLE, BUT WORLD’S ATHLETES MUST NOT PAY

(IN Honolulu Star-Bulletin, April 6, 2008)

By Robert Weiner and John Larmett

China is beginning to reap the rewards of the upcoming Summer Olympics in Beijing—they have just launched what they hope will be celebrations of the traditional Torch Relay on all continents.

The problem is, as soon as the Torch leaves China, the rest of the world will protest China’s inexcusable handling of Tibet, and the Olympic Torch media events will become protest events—because, China will find out, the rest of us believe in free speech.

But Torch protests are not enough. Nor is the growing movement, started by Germany and France, to withhold heads of government and delegations from the Opening Ceremony.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) should exercise the rule under the Olympic Charter, allowing it to “withdraw, at any time and with immediate effect, the organization of the Olympic games from the host city” and relocate this summer’s Games, scheduled for August 8-24, to a recent former Olympic venue such as Athens or Sydney. Both cities are equipped, able and could be quickly readied to host the Summer Games.

In order to win the right to host the 2008 Summer Olympic Games, China held out the promise that human rights would benefit if the event was staged in Beijing. But China has gone back on its word in key areas of human rights in clear violation of the Olympic spirit, with press freedom a notable victim of Beijing’s rights crackdown in Tibet ahead of the Games. The Chinese government has shot and killed over 100 innocent monks, and arrested over 1000, peacefully protesting Beijing’s ruthless suppression of their culture, religion and autonomy. If that weren’t bad enough, the pollution is so bad in Beijing that the world’s top marathoner, Haile Gebrselassie, has already decided that he will not compete.

Concerning the Olympics, China might have gotten away with assisting Darfur because the aid, inexcusable, is economic and one level removed from directly killing people, which the Sudanese government, not the Chinese, have done. They might have gotten away with pawning defective human and pet food, toys and other products to the United States and the world. They might have gotten away with predatory trade practices and the pretense of stating they will ever buy parallel products from the U.S., which has yet to happen. The Olympics are for the athletes, and politics is usually forgotten.

Murdering hundreds and arresting thousands of innocent monks because they want to state their philosophy and their right to freedom rightly has the world’s ire. Yet, canceling the Games would abuse and destroy a key forum that itself sends the message of nonviolent international cooperation. It would also unfairly penalize nearly 11,000 of the world’s athletes, make them innocent victims, and steal the highlight of the careers of most.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called on the world March 21st, as she arrived to meet the Dalai Lama at his home in India, to denounce China’s crackdown of anti-government protests in Tibet, calling the crisis “a challenge to the conscience of the world. If freedom loving people throughout the world do not speak out against China and the Chinese in Tibet, we have lost all moral authority to speak out on human rights,” Pelosi said.

President Bush has pushed hard against the Tibet violence, speaking to President Hu of China by phone last week (March 27) and urging his “reaching out to and addressing the grievance of the people in Tibet.”

Even IOC president Jacques Rogge expressed his concern over the violence in Tibet in a statement released on March 23rd: “The events in Tibet are of great concern to the IOC. This conflict should be resolved peacefully as soon as possible. Violence for whatever reason is contrary to the Olympic values and spirit.”

No one wants to harm the Chinese people – in fact, America and the world love the Chinese people. At the same time, no one wants to hurt the Olympics as a forum for world understanding through the competition and camaraderie of the athletes of over 200 nations. A way the IOC and the world can send a meaningful message to China’s government and protect the Olympic Charter’s mission statement of “encouraging and supporting the promotion of ethics in sport as well as education of youth through sport and to dedicate its efforts to ensuring that, in sport, the spirit of fair play prevails and violence is banned” is to relocate – not boycott – this summer’s Olympic Games.

[Weiner and Larmett added in press release also 4/7/08:

If a relocation proves impossible, we still can and must put more pressure on the IOC to understand the severity of the situation, encourage more world leaders to skip the opening ceremony, support the Monks who get the Internet, foster bigger Torch protests as it goes by, and give confidence to the opposition.]

Robert Weiner is a former White House public affairs director, was a spokesman at the Sydney and Salt Lake Olympics for the White House and World Anti-Doping Agency, and is an active USA Track & Field national masters athlete. John Larmett, a former foreign affairs legislative assistant in Congress, is senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates.

 

www.weinerpublic.com

Robert Weiner, NATIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ISSUES STRATEGIST Bob Weiner, a national issues and public affairs strategist, has been spokesman for and directed the public affairs offices of White House Drug Czar and Four Star General Barry McCaffrey, the House Government Operations Committee and Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY) and the House Narcotics Committee, and was Chief of Staff for the House Aging Committee and Chairman Claude Pepper (D-FL). He also was Legislative Assistant to Ed Koch of New York and a political aide to Ted Kennedy (D-MA) for his Presidential and Senate races. Bob worked at the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate as youth voter registration director in 1971-1972 when the constitution was amended to allow 18-year olds the vote. Since he left the White House in 2001, Bob heads up a public affairs and issue strategies company, Robert Weiner Associates. He is a regular political analyst on Radio America and has appeared on Bill Maher, CNN Crossfire, Today, Good Morning America, and the CBS, NBC, and ABC evening news. He is widely published in columns he writes on national issues in major papers throughout the country including recently the Washington Post, Denver Post, Miami Herald, Christian Science Monitor, New York Daily News, Baltimore Sun, Boston Globe, Cleveland Plain Dealer, Atlanta Constitution, New York Post, Washington Times, Sacramento Bee, Palm Beach Post, Salt Lake Tribune, Minneapolis Star Tribune, and Adweek. He is also regularly quoted in key media coast-to-coast, including the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, AP and Reuters, concerning the presidential campaign and national issues.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments

Los Angeles
AntonioLos Angeles

ANTI CHINESE PROPAGANDA

The  demonizing of China has reached ridiculous proportions. It is such an obvious ploy by the State Dept to mould public opinion against a very successful and competitive system. The US should not push China too far. All China has to do is switch to the Euro and sink the dollar economy, much of which is under Chinese control thanks to greedy US capitalists who thought they were going to clean up  investing in China. China can control the US with a stroke of a pen, so the US propagandists should tread carefully lest they get more than they bargained for. This BS about Tibet is another card in the encirclement of China; Phillipines, Japan, Korea, and now Tibet.

In 1951, the communists took power in Tibet. For two centuries no one had considered Tibet as an state independent of China. As late as 1950, India recognized Tibet as part of China, and the British ratified this position. Only the US hesitated. They decided they would use Tibet as an anti-communist bastion. The US were isolated in their efforts. They were unable to establish an international coalition for their position. In 1951 the Tibetan elite accepted peaceful negotiations with China. This changed in 1956 when Chinese authorities instituted an agrarian reform in Sicunai in favor of the peasants. The local ruling class did not accept that their lands would be affected and led an armed uprising. The CIA was intimately involved in this (See The CIA’s Secret War in Tibet, by Conboy). The CIA took hundreds of Tibetans to the US and trained them in guerrilla warfare. They parachuted weapons into Tibetan territory. They trained the Tibetans to shoot from horseback. The US Congress gave the Dalai Lama a gold medal. The Dalai Lama in return praised Bush as a man of freedom, democracy and human rights. Previously he had called the war in Afganistan a liberation and Viet Nam as a failure. The Dalai lama is supported by the extreme right, thanks to his rabid anti-communism. He has also made racist statements, to the effect that Tibetans must preserve the purity of their race, and he condemns marriage with non-Tibetans. According to James Miles of The Economist, the current demonstrations are violent and bloody. Young Tibetans armed with sabers and Molotov cocktails atacked Hui businesses, plundering them and setting them on fire. The Hui are a moslem minority who have lived there or centuries. Tibetan monks and youth also attacked Chinese businesses, breaking doors and windows, burning buildings and beating the Chinese who crossed their path. Some Chinese have been lynched. The situation got out of control. Currently 13 innocent civilians have died. They had been burned alive or beaten to death. The demonstrators had wounded 60 police, 5 of them critically. 300 buildings have been burned down, 214 of them stores. 56 cars were destroyed. (These figures need updating). The Chinese authorities have used no firearms. The authorities are convinced that the riots had been planned and organized ahead of time as a provocation. They blame the Dalai Lama or much of the violence.

by Antonio (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 63 comments) on Monday, April 7, 2008 at 1:36:56 PM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

The real concern of this former White House propagandist

is not Tibetan monks, but simply the opportunity to engage in some pseudo-moralistic China bashing.

Let's criticize the US war criminals first, whose horrific crimes dwarf those of the Chinese. After we assign blame and punish the criminals responsible for Iraq, the Vietnam War, countless US atrocities in South and Central America, and the US-backed strangulation of Palestine, we can discuss wrongdoing by the Chinese government, which pales in comparison.

Who cares if President Bush or Nancy Pelosi made some stupid remark about the Chinese? Both of these people are liars and war criminals, who belong in prison for treason. The US lacks the moral authority to criticize the government of any other nation. Indeed, the US is the world's leading terrorist state & "purveyor of violence," as accurately noted by MLK.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1165 comments) on Monday, April 7, 2008 at 3:14:42 PM
 


Student of history, religion, exoteric and esoteric, the Humanities in general and advocate for peace, justice and the unity of humankind, not through force, but through self-realization and mutual respect.
Mac McKinneyStudent of history, religion, exoteric and esoteric, the Humanities in general and advocate for peace, justice and the unity of humankind, not through force, but through self-realization and mutual respect.

Boycott All Teams from Countries that Abuse other Countries

No, let's stick with boycotts, but let's make it a boycott of teams. Don't sell them plane tickets, don't watch them play, don't show them on TV. I will gladly boycott the Chinese if we also boycott the United States for tearing to shreds Iraq, if we boycott Britain for its role in this sorry project too, if we boycott Israel for devastating Palestinians for 50 or so years, if we boycott Turkey for oppressing the Kurds for decades and decades, and on and on.

Meanwhile, the Great Game goes on between the United States and China, the Alpha male versus the challenger. The challenger, however, has a huge advantage. He is the Alpha male's banker, and is generally a lot smarter.

by Mac McKinney (42 articles, 68 quicklinks, 164 diaries, 1061 comments) on Monday, April 7, 2008 at 5:06:26 PM
 


American Expat in Asia
pftAmerican Expat in Asia

Boycott

Maybe we should be banned from the Olympics for War Crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I believe whats going on outside China is staged by CIA and British intelligence. 

I believe the Chinese staged whats going on in Tibet in advance of the Olympics knowing that the CIA and British might agitate in Tibet during the Olympics. We have a history of this. This allows them to shut down Tibet until after the Olympics are over, and there are other reasons I will get to.

http://en.epochtimes.com/news/8-3-28/67906.html

They also staged the hijack attempt from a 19 yo Uighur girl from Xinjiang region.   Both are considered terrorist incidents in China, and the timing is so coincidentally close to one another if they were spontaneous events. Why would they do so a thing? Same reason we do it. They learn quickly, glad we export our knowledge in how to control peoples opinions, just attack your own people and call those who did it terrorists. The Olympics have been a good excuse to increase security against "terrorism" and the local papers have been harping on the homegrown terrorist threat during the Olympics for over a year now.

But some might think there are too many risks for China to do such a thing. They want the Olympics to go off well, right?  First of all, they understand that none of their major trading partners are going to boycott them. Maybe some foreigners won't visit to see the games freeing up some tickets for the locals. Maybe some foreigners will not be able to go to Tibet as a side trip when demonstrations arranged by the CIA and Brits would have been most likely. Those are positives.

Now, one thing you have to understand about the Chinese, is they rely on the spirit of nationalism to keep their people under control. Talk of independence from Tibet, Xinjiang and Taiwan infuriate the people and unite them. Thats good for China's government to control their people.

What about boycotts by European leaders. Perfect for China. The Chinese still get hot and bothered over the Europeans exploitation of them over 100 years ago. Such disrespect being shown by foreigners simply because the government tried to suppress the terrorism of those advocating independence smacks of a double standard, and will get them all hot and bothered, and will unite them further.

Imagine a hispanic group in California deciding they want independence and start rioting. If that happened in Bushs term we would be dropping bombs on LA like we are doing in Basra.

Lest we forget the 1936 Olympics. Hitler and his jewish policies were being widely reported. Even so, The 1936 summer Olympics had the largest representation of nations participating than in any other previous Olympics, including the US.

We did boycott the 1980 Olympics over the Soviets invasion of Afghanistan. This was an invasion we desired, and induced by financing and arming insurgents to destabilize the government before the Soviets invaded (not after). None of the European nations boycotted in 1980. They won't boycott China either.

Look what we did when pakistan committed genocide of the bagladesh people, 500K-3 million dead, East Timor (200 K), Cyprus .  Nothing.

My understand of Tibet in the DL's time is things were pretty bad for the lower class, which was most of Tibet. The DL is a CIA stooge at this point. What China is doing in Tibet pales in comparison to what we do in Iraq and elsewhere.

by pft (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 464 comments) on Tuesday, April 8, 2008 at 1:26:05 AM
 

 

6 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

30 Lies Refuted about Ayers and Obama Posted by John Wilson

This Is Our Obama! Posted by Donna Roepenack

Those Who Call Obama A Muslim Posted by Rob Kall

Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not Pass by Patrick Henningsen

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

The End of American Hegemony by Paul Craig Roberts

Meet The $700 Billion Bailout Czar by Rob Kall

Martial Law? by Jayne Lyn Stahl

I Just Prevented Thousands of Californians from Having to Vote on Provisional Ballots! by Emily Levy

Go To Top 50 Most Popular