![]() |
|
|
September 16, 2007 at 20:45:51
by Robert Sargent Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|
...remember Abu Musab al Zarqawi, a Jordanian terrorist, al Qaeda affiliate; ran a training camp in Afghanistan for al Qaeda, then migrated -- after we went into Afghanistan and shut him down there, he went to Baghdad, took up residence there before we ever launched into Iraq; organized the al Qaeda operations inside Iraq before we even arrived on the scene, and then, of course, led the charge for Iraq until we killed him last June.... This is al Qaeda operating in Iraq. And as I say, they were present before we invaded Iraq. - Dick Cheney interview with Rush Limbaugh 4/5/07 Now this from NBC's Chief Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski's March 2, 2004 article "Avoiding Attacking Suspected Terrorist Mastermind": "In June 2002, U.S. officials say intelligence had revealed that Zarqawi and members of al-Qaeda had set up a weapons lab at Kirma, in northern Iraq, producing deadly ricin and cyanide. The Pentagon quickly drafted plans to attack the camp with cruise missiles and air-strikes and sent it to the White House, where, according to U.S. government sources, the plan was debated to death in the National Security Council...Four months later, intelligence showed Zarqawi was planning to use ricin in terrorist attacks in Europe. The Pentagon drew up a second strike plan, and the White House again killed in...In January 2003, the threat turned real. Police in London arrested six terror suspects and discovered a ricin lab connected to the camp in Iraq...The Pentagon drew up still another attack plan, and for the third time, the National Security Council killed it."
Military officials quoted in the article explained "the administration feared destroying the terrorist camp in Iraq could undercut its case for war against Saddam."
The Miklaszewski article, which cited unnamed sources, was confirmed in a 2006 ABC TV interview with Mike Scheuer, who in 2002 was head of the CIA's Osama bin Laden unit: "Almost every day we sent a package to the White House that had overhead imagery of the house he [Zarqawi] was staying in. It was a terrorist training camp . . . experimenting with ricin and anthrax . . . any collateral damage there would have been terrorists."
On May 7th, 2004, Nick Berg, a U.S. civilian seeking telecommunications work in Iraq, was, according to the CIA, personally beheaded by Abu Musab al Zarqawi. In 2007, Dick Cheney is still citing Zarqawi's presence in Iraq as justification for our invasion. What the Vice President fails to mention, of course, is that it was not Saddam Hussein, but the Bush Administration, for the purpose of maintaining a false pretext for war, that was allowing a safe haven for al Qaeda in Iraq.
Nick Berg was collateral damage in a propaganda war.
I read Miklaszewski's article for the first time less than a year ago. The calculating and paradoxically thuggish nature of the President's inaction became, for me, a Holden Caulfield confronted with profane graffiti moment, causing me to become insanely mad, if not madly insane. Willful, wanton, and malicious malfeasance of this magnitude, with intent to exploit America's patriotic innocence and naivete, were it somehow not outright treason, surely would, at a minimum, command impeachment, would it not?
Jim Miklaszewski's report came eight months before the re-election of George W. Bush. I never heard anything about it. John Kerry was swift-boated for his heroic service in Vietnam, yet the intentional act of preserving al Qaeda in Iraq - at the risk of deadly attacks on European civilians and possible attacks in the U.S., and which ultimately led to the beheading of Nick Berg and the deaths of hundreds, probably thousands of other innocent civilians, for the purpose of securing a bogus argument for war; indeed, as described in the famous Downing Street memo, "fixing the intelligence around the policy" - was not even tangentially an issue for the 2004 presidential election. Astonishing. Stunning. Preposterous! Strange, and ironic - an electorate quick to sign on to war, yet in other ways as passive, detached and ambivalent as Herman Melville's Bartleby - a civilian and presumably educated population that would "prefer not to" consider, let alone be responsible for, the implications and long-term ramifications of an imperial, aggressive, and Machiavellian presidency - this presidency!
Americans almost universally agree that terrorism is an unacceptable, evil means by which to attempt to achieve a political objective. What the Bush Administration is guilty of, in case anyone is fuzzy about this, is sustaining an al Qaeda terrorist operation for its political value, at the price of Nick Berg's head as well as the death, dismemberment, and otherwise physical and/or emotional wreckage of other innocent civilians - lots of them. Thousands!
So here I sit, alone in the dark, bleary eyed, hot MacBook in my lap; distraught; exasperated - seemingly alone in Melvillian despair. Ah, the apathy! Ah, Nick Berg! "Ah, humanity!".
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 3 comments |
|
Impotent in the face of evil
Not the evil of al-Qaida or terrorists or even our home-grown terrorists in the form of street gangs, but the evil within our own government, the evil that leads, directs and dictates from the White House. For the current administration we should temporarily change the name to the Black House. We, all of us, the Congress, the press have been impotent since the 2000 election came into dispute. We've all been steam-rollered by Bush and gang. Over the past six plus years there have been so many things to get our ire up, and they're mixing together in muddled mess. When I first read your piece I thought -- Daniel Pearl. Then it took me five hours and a half-night's sleep to recall Pearl's name. With Bush, like Emily LeTella on SNL famously said at the end of her schticks: There's always something. Yes, it's enraging that Nick Berg died at Bush's hands, but so are the deaths of at least 3,779 U.S. soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and Afghanis. I'm in a rage over W.'s trashing of the Constitution, his signing statements, warrantless wire tapping and presidential edicts, just to name four. The outrages are coming too fast and too furiously. They must be cheaper by the dozen, because there seems to be at least a bakers dozen a day. And they all don't come from Washington; they fly at us from D.C. all the way down through our local officials. The piling on of the outrages reminds me of the back of my desk chair. I get up so early in the morning that it's chilly, so I put on a blouse over my sleeveless tee, and before long I'm broiling, so I take it off and throw it over the back of my chair. Before I know it, there are so many blouses on the chairback that it's ready to topple. That's how I feel about the outrages. Everyday there are so many I feel like I'm going to topple over and my head is going to explode. How to get people to get interested in their own government? I don't have a clue. I suspect most are too busy keeping body and soul together...except they do have time to get all a twitter over Britney, or Anna Nichole, or O.J. But, then they're easy to get one's head wrapped around without it exploding. by Sandy Sand (198 articles, 0 quicklinks, 227 diaries, 1548 comments [2 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Sep 17, 2007 at 7:07:20 AM
|
|
Reply: Emily Litella?
I thought it was Gilda's (RIP...I love that girl!) Rosanne Rosanna Danna that always said that to Jane Curtain... by Robert Sargent (10 articles, 0 quicklinks, 26 diaries, 318 comments) on Monday, Sep 17, 2007 at 8:40:07 AM
|
|
Reply: I think your right.
So is RIP. It probably was Roseanne Roseanna Danna. You didn't get my shorts up in a bunch. "They" do! I thought if I worked I might not have time to get riled, then I remembered that you and so many people I know work and get worked up. Like I said, there's always something. by Sandy Sand (198 articles, 0 quicklinks, 227 diaries, 1548 comments [2 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:47:02 AM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |