Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (10 comments)

Did Israeli Jets Violate Syrian Airspace to Test New Russian Defense Technology Also In Iran

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

When "enemy" nations acquire new military technologies, how do you assess their capabilities? How do you determine whether the manufacturers claims for the technology are accurate?

Last week, Syria reported that several Israeli jets violated Syrian airspace.

Now, the Israeli news site, debka.com suggests that the fly-over exposed the failure of new, Russian technology that both Syria and Iran just installed to protect their airspace.

DEBKAfile's military experts conclude from the way Damascus described the episode Wednesday, Sept. 6, that the Pantsyr-S1E missiles, purchased from Russia to repel air assailants, failed to down the Israeli jets accused of penetrating northern Syrian airspace from the Mediterranean the night before.

The new Pantsyr missiles therefore leave Syrian and Iranian airspace vulnerable to hostile intrusion.

This finding is VERY important to any nation interested in and considering attacking a country using this new technology for defense-- like the USA, and Dick Cheney's plans for Iran.

It is often suggested, by detractors, that debka.com is a surrogate of the mossad . This report could be a publicity effort for Israel, that demonstrates Israel's role in helping the US prepare for an attack against Iran. Or, it could be a test by Israel to determine the abilities of the new systems so Israel is more ready to attack, or at least threaten attack of Iran.



Either way, it looks to me like this was far more than the accidental territorial violation Israel reported it to be. It removes one impediment to attacking Iran-- one which no-one has discussed.

Of course, it also reveals that Russia has a stake in the looming conflict. This could be good or bad. Russia is making a lot of money selling to Iran, as the sabers are brandished. The more the US raises the threat of conflict, it is likely that Iran will spend more with Russia and possibly China. The more Iran is driven to Russia and China,  (China is believed to be supplying the Taliban with weapons, using Iran as the channel. )

The bad news is that Russia and China are siding with Iran, providing military technology. The good news is that the Russian and Chinese connections to Iran may be enough to dissuade chickenhawks Bush and Cheney from actually attacking, and may even be enough to get Cheney and Bush to prevent Israel from attacking Iran too.  

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Why is it "bad news" that someone is helping Iran? by Rosa Schmidt Azadi on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007 at 9:54:51 AM
read it again. by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:02:01 AM
Unless of course.................... by Ernest on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:46:18 AM
Interesting take by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:20:49 AM
ITS JUST GOOD POKER by WML on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007 at 2:45:54 PM
There's another Poker analogy by Charlie L on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007 at 6:48:39 PM
Our esteemed host wrote: by Dana Pico on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007 at 8:04:58 PM
Israeli Jets Violate Syrian Airspace to Test New Russian by Eddy Schmid on Wednesday, Sep 12, 2007 at 6:13:03 AM
Let's say this........... by Ernest on Wednesday, Sep 12, 2007 at 7:33:41 AM
Iran and Sunburn by Steve Beckow on Monday, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:05:23 AM