Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Who's Screwing America's Female Democrats?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (282 fans)

opednews.com

Women, Who make up the Majority of the Democratic Party, are being Stabbed in the back, by a Few Senate Leaders, a Governor and a whole bunch of spineless Women's Organizations.

Democratic women are about to be stabbed in the back. It started out as a plan by Chuck Schumer, Harry Reid and Ed Rendell. They saw that Bob Casey, jr., son of a former PA governor, polled well against Santorum. So they made up their minds that THEY would decide who would be the Democratic candidate to run in the 2006 PA senate race.

There's one problem with that. Casey, like his father, is anti-abortion, anti-embryonic stemcell. That's a big problem. This race will be the most closely watched election in the nation. The right wing democrats who have been sabotaging the integrity, values and leadership of the Democratic party are dying to claim that a Casey win proves that the way for Democrats to win is to oppose abortion-- to oppose the woman's right that was fought for for decades.

If Casey wins, this could be the most damaging, most devastating thing to impact upon women's rights in decades. It could be, and will be horrible.

It doesn't matter that Santorum is a loser, than any decent candidate can kick his butt, including good candidates who back women's rights.

It doesn't matter that Casey has a track record of having a big lead and then losing in a competitive race.


It doesn't matter that the choice of Casey in this race has put women's rights on the line.

Regardless, some of the biggest names in the Democratic side of the senate have come to PA to support and raise money for Casey-- Hillary, Barrack, John Kerry. They're all doing their share of the effort to sabotage the rights of women.

Now here's what I don't understand. The women's rights advocacy groups appear to be doing nothing. Like Jews in the Warsaw ghetto, they are hoping that Casey will not screw them, even though he has already said that he supported Alito. It's hard to understand why they have not spoken out against Casey and for either one of the two pro-women's right candidates who are running. I'm supporting one of those candidates-- Chuck Pennacchio-- because I desperately, passionately, intensely, teeth grittingly want to get rid of Rick Santorum and I don't think Casey can or will do it. I think Pennacchio has a much better shot.

I don't understand why the women's organizations-- National organization of Women N.O.W. or NARAL are not out there, telling their members in PA and all over the USA and the world to contribute to Pennacchio's campaign. I don't understand why these women's organizations aren't telling Rendell and Schumen and the DSCC (democratic campaign committee) how they are outraged that they would even consider betraying women, who make up over 60% of the Democratic party in PA, by running a candidate who doesn't fully support women's rights.

But then again, PA is a bit of a backward state. Remember, over 60%-- actually, in our poll, 64% of Democrats-- are women in PA. Yet there is only one candidate running for the whole PA senate who is a woman. Do you get the feeling that there is something wrong with the Democratic leadership in PA, like maybe, the old guys who have been running it, screwing it up, failing to build a winning team, failing to elect a US senator in a routine election in 44 years, should be replaced-- that new blood should be taking over the PA Democratic party? But I digress.

Where the hell is NARAL President Nancy Keenan, or NOW prresident Kim Gandy? Why aren't they beating the bushes for support for Pennacchio? If Pennacchio beats Casey in the primary, in spite of the support from the meddlling outside state senators, he'll be on the cover of every news magazine and in a position to raise millions. These women must be very confused or deluded if they're fantasizing that life will be better without Santorum. These leaders of women's organizations are failing the people who fund their organizations by failing to flat out oppose Casey. Maybe they are colluding with and making deals with the senators who "annointed" Casey. Maybe they are fooling themselves into thinking they can cut some kind of deal that will make up for remaining silent, allowing Casey to win the primary so he can go on to face Santorum.

Bad move. Bad thinking, Bad strategizing. Maybe these organizations are due to be replaced, or at least the leaders should be replaced. The Women in PA need to get together, and they better do it fast, since the women's organizations in place are totally failing them. They women better get organized and fight Casey with tooth and nail. But it's not just PA.

The Democrats who are willing to sell out by supporting an anti-women's rights candidate (and don't dare quibble that outside of women having the right to control their bodies, Casey's okay. That is the main right!!) will be happy to adopt a POLICY of selecting candidates who take t the position that they oppose abortion, if Casey wins.

This is the test case. This is what sell-out senators from other states are helping to raise milliions of dollars to push through.

I'm writing this article, listing organizations and names because I'm hoping that readers will write to the leaders of these national organizations and their PA affiliates to shame them, to demand that they get off their butts and do something.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and website architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), and publisher of Storycon.org, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Listen to over 200 of Rob's Podcast interviews here.

Rob is, with Opednews.com the first media winner of the Pillar Award for supporting Whistleblowers and the first amendment.


With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom-up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey and Positive Psychology. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. Watch me speaking on Bottom up economics at the Occupy G8 Economic Summit, here.

See more Rob Kall articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about Rob and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article. For Rob's work in non-political realms mostly before 2000, see his C.V..

And here's a one hour radio interview where I was a guest- on Envision This, on 10/23/13. And here is the transcript. 

And Rob's quotes are here.

To watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, former Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video.

Rob's radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also hosted a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table


Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Libertarian Legacy? Ron Paul's Campaign Manager, 49, Dies Uninsured, Of Pneumonia, Leaving family $400,000 Debt

Interview: McCain Fellow Hanoi Hilton POW & Naval Academy Dorm-mate; Why He Won't Vote For McCain

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Excuse Me! Women have control over their body! We... by on Saturday, Mar 18, 2006 at 2:24:27 PM
Believe me, you are in the minority of the prolife... by Rob Kall on Sunday, Mar 19, 2006 at 9:21:54 AM
In 1981 The U.S. Supreme Court gave women the rig... by on Sunday, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:25:52 AM
National organization of Women N.O.W. or NARAL are... by Robert Chapman on Sunday, Mar 19, 2006 at 1:54:02 PM
Harry S Truman was fond of saying: "if you give th... by frank stellaugh on Sunday, Mar 19, 2006 at 2:46:17 PM
This in Reply to Robert Chapman. Re Pennacchio's p... by Rob Kall on Sunday, Mar 19, 2006 at 4:32:37 PM
Regarding Prelingoal and Mr. Kall's latest remarks... by Robert Chapman on Sunday, Mar 19, 2006 at 5:31:18 PM
Who the heck thinks Casey is a progressive? He is... by Austin on Monday, Mar 20, 2006 at 9:15:52 AM