Tags for This Article:

War -Antiwar (1859)  War Civilian Targets (351)  Morality Morals (232)  War Human Cost (226)  Dept Of Defense DOD (169) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 16, 2007 at 08:25:11

Choosing the Hardest Thing

by Richard Girard     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

Choosing the Hardest Thing

by Richard Girard            

“Why are you asking us to do the hardest thing?” ―Joseph Biden, (D-Delaware) to Air America Radio host Randi Rhodes in 2004            

If—in the terms of action—the perfect is the enemy of the good, then the expedient is the enemy of the right.            

The Democrats have once again chosen expediency over principle, by extending a supplemental appropriation for the Occupation of Iraq into September.  The Democrats—particularly in the Senate—have acquiesced to the wants of the Republican White House so often, you have to wonder if they have been quietly told, “Do what we tell you to do, or we'll Wellstone you.”            

This has to stop—now.             

George W. Bush is a sociopathic bully, who will not hesitate to do anything to get his way.  He has lied, cheated, and squandered any credibility or good will the rest of the world might have for the United States, in exchange for some fleeting advantages to himself and the American Military-Industrial Complex.  Like all bullies, he will continue to threaten opponents and intimidate the public until someone tells him, “No!” and makes it stick.            

Congress must put the fear of God (and prison) into Bush, Cheney, Rice, Gonzalez, and the rest of the crypto-fascist White House, with meaningful threats of  impeachment and criminal prosecution.  If they do not, we will wake up one morning to discover that Bush has (due to a Katrina level natural disaster, a September 11th level terrorist attack, or 1929 level economic disaster) thrown out the Constitution, using National Security Presidential Directive Number 51 as the basis for his action.  If we permit that to happen, it may require an armed insurrection to throw Bush and his coterie out of office.            

Americans shouldn't be surprised that the Congress did not say no to the Sociopath-in-Chief.  The majority of human beings go through life as impervious and uncomprehending of their real effect on the world as a meteorite that strikes the Earth.  Unfortunately, high political office has never ensured a commiserate degree of situational or historical awareness.            

 “Do The Right Thing” is the title of one of Spike Lee's best movies, and the rallying cry for all people with even a shred of integrity.  One of the great tragedies that I have come to recognize in my lifetime, is that although society expects people to do the right thing, it rarely confirms accolades if they do.  The depth of this tragedy lies in my observation that it is easier (in terms of effort) to do the wrong thing (or evil) than it is to do the right thing (or good); conversely, it is easier to do the right thing (or good), than it is to undo a wrong thing (or evil).            

This is especially true when individuals and groups are driven to undertake an action (or set of actions) out of fear.  Fear weighs upon the human psyche heavier than any other emotion.  Human beings wish to be rid of their fear as quickly as possible, and we tend to ignore the consequences inherent in our precipitous reactions and ill-considered solutions to that fear.            

Worse still, unscrupulous individuals and groups will take advantage of our fears, and encourage us into taking actions which will increase these unscrupulous individuals' or groups power or influence, inevitably to our own later regret.  This fact is true whether you are describing Hitler's Germany after the Reichstag fire, the United States after September 11, 2001, or even a fictional galaxy “far, far away” in the Star Wars films.            

I bring up Star Wars as an example for one reason only: the fall of Anikin Skywalker from grace to become Darth Vader—mirrored by the simultaneous descent of the democratic Galactic Republic into a fascist Empire—is symptomatic of the basic reaction to fear that we all experience.  This six-part cinema epic of the ascent, fall, and redemption of Skywalker/Vader, has the advantage of being a well known story from popular culture, and does an exemplary job of demonstrating the ease with which you can do evil, and the near impossibility of undoing evil.  It is not history, it is myth; but as Joseph Campbell made clear in his writings, myths tell us a higher truth about ourselves and our world than any history or philosophy.            

So, you ask, if this moral wrong, if this so-called evil exists, then define it.              

As Justice Potter Stewart said of pornography, I know it when I see it, but inevitably evil has one consistent component: it devalues living things—especially human beings, individually or collectively—in their relationship to the rest of the world.            

This devaluation of life primarily takes two forms.  The first is when living beings, especially humans, are devalued or demonized until they are objectified, their value reduced and narrowed until they are thought of solely for their quantifiable utility rather than the abstract or any other qualitative value they might possess.  The second is when non-living things (e.g., monies, power, ideologies) are exalted in both their utilitarian and abstract value above the value of living things, especially human beings..            

 1  |  2  |  3

 

Richard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden. His fondest desire is to be the one to arrest Bush and Cheney after they leave office in 2009.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments

Mark A. Goldman is an activist, author, and now a Candidate for a Congress (7th District WA State) for 2008.  Only the two candidates who receive the most votes in the primary election in August will be on the November ballot.
Mark A. GoldmanMark A. Goldman is an activist, author, and now a Candidate for a Congress (7th District WA State) for 2008.  Only the two candidates who receive the most votes in the primary election in August will be on the November ballot.

Next Step

You make very good points.  I've been offering my observations since 2001.  Now I see that that words are not enough.  We need to take some bold action and I've written about that too.  But useful action can only begin by those who have similar realizations to those you have.  The most important, in my view, begins with oneself and not with trying to change other people's behavior.  I think it starts with being willing to run for office or vote for people who are willing to run who are aligned with your state of consciousness.  The problem is, that those are not currently the people most likely to win elections.  The irony is, you have to be willing to lose to win.  Leadership begins with the realization that you have to take action before that action becomes popular.  For example, Nader was the best candidate of the bunch in 2000.  When he lost, a lot of people blamed him for turning the White House over to Bush.  But Nader was still the better candidate.  No apologies needed.  Democrats didn't have the heart or the courage to vote their conscience.  Many had tried harder to knock Nader out of the race than anything else.  These people didn't believe in Democracy.  And many of Nader's supporters just lost faith and hope because they didn't have the conviction that comes with knowing and trusting one's own integrity and staying true to it.  Nader lost because his supporters were not steadfast over more than one election cycle.  They collapsed in the face of defeat and in the face of flack from Democrats who weren't willing or able to take responsibility for their own failures.  We're not going to change the consciousness or win back our country if we are weak in spirit or lacking in integrity.  But that spirit and that integrity must come from within and it must begin with each individual willing to live truly according to his or her own consciousness regardless of what other people are doing.  When we have enough individuals willing to do that, we will have a government of the People, by the People, and for the People.

by Mark A. Goldman (80 articles, 2 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 242 comments) on Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 9:51:13 AM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

No you won't

If you keep splitting the liberal vote with independents like Nader, you will be stuck with Republicans like Bush ad infinitum. Gore was a better candidate than Nader in my opinion, especially because Nader could never have won, and even if he did, he would never have gotten anything passed through Congress. You would need to change the Congress to a bunch of Ralph Naders at the same time, and that’s impossible because they wouldn't get elected in most states either.

Face it, until you have two terrible candidates running against someone with the star power of Arnold Schwarzenegger, you will never get a progressive liberal in the White House. Americans want stars, not statesmen.

After Bush, there may be a slight shift toward liberalism, but the media and the corporate puppet masters will not go away quietly.

by John R Moffett (79 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 596 comments) on Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 11:06:26 AM
 


Mark A. Goldman is an activist, author, and now a Candidate for a Congress (7th District WA State) for 2008.  Only the two candidates who receive the most votes in the primary election in August will be on the November ballot.
Mark A. GoldmanMark A. Goldman is an activist, author, and now a Candidate for a Congress (7th District WA State) for 2008.  Only the two candidates who receive the most votes in the primary election in August will be on the November ballot.

Americans want stars, not statesmen.

Well there you have it and that's my point.  "Americans want stars, not statemen."  And what do you want?  You don't care what you want, you will still vote for the person everyone else wants.  And as long as you do that Americans will get stars and not statesmen.  You are afraid to vote for what you want because you are afraid you will always lose.  But you do always lose anyway... after all, you never really get what you want.  But how could you. You never vote for what you want.  You can't win your way and you think you can't win my way.  But you've tried it your way for a long time.  This is where it's got us.  The truth matters and the truth is more powerful than superficial tripe.  That's wisdom.  Most people aren't seeking wisdom.  But until they do, we'll repeat the mistakes of the past over and over again... because the path to those mistakes appears to be so obviously intuitive when it fact it is not.  Decency is not complicated.  It's very simple.  It's so simple people can't believe it's worth considering.

by Mark A. Goldman (80 articles, 2 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 242 comments) on Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 7:47:17 PM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

Your idea condemns us to permanent slavery under existing

conditions. There is no escape, if one accepts your way of thinking, because it will always be possible to hold up "splitting the liberal vote" as the primary bugaboo. Once one accepts that splitting the "liberal" vote is the worst possible outcome, one is obliged to always vote for Democrats, who will always seem a bit better (at least to the superficial eye) than Republicans.

This is no solution, and offers no prospect of a real solution. What you are really saying, whether or not you recognize it, is that one must resign oneself to the two-party system forever, & one must always vote for Democrats -- and that this is the best that can be hoped for.

We don't have the two-party system because it "allows the populace to democratically vote for progressive change." We have it because it guarantees permanent rule by big money. As long as people accept that the universe of choice is limited to D's & R's, big money will always win. This is what you're essentially arguing that everyone must accept.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1104 comments) on Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 10:18:24 PM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

The Marshall Plan was not (as so often asserted) generosity

on the part of the US -- it was 100% self-interest. The policy makers understood perfectly well what they were trying to achieve: the reconstruction of the global capitalist system, in such a way that US dominance was central, unquestioned & unchallengeable.

This required getting Western Europe and Japan back on their feet -- but in decidedly subordinate & dependent roles. If policy makers had NOT helped get those industrialized nations back on their feet, it would not have been possible for US corporations to sell to overseas markets, and to establish the kind of dominance the US achieved in the postwar period.

It's a remarkable aspect of the US propaganda system that we are always told how "generous" the Marshall Plan was -- and almost everyone accepts the idea, unquestioningly. The less pleasant truth of the matter is that the US government is essentially hired by economic elites to carry out their bidding. Being a "nice guy," being moral and "generous" has never had the slightest thing to do with it.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1104 comments) on Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 3:44:24 PM
 


I am a retired civil servant. I was an electronics technician.
BarkerI am a retired civil servant. I was an electronics technician.

Gore blew it

Dear Richard Girard,

America lost its chance in 2000 because of Al Gore. He committed the sin of running against Ralph Nader instead of running with him. If Gore and Nader had been on the same ticket Gore would be in the White House now.
I ask you - did Gore win election in 2000? If so, did Joe Lieberman also win?

by Barker (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 109 comments) on Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 3:58:30 PM
 


The author a human who has made a important discovery."I'm just happy to be here..."  
RoageThe author a human who has made a important discovery."I'm just happy to be here..."  

Doing Good Hard?

Hi,

If doing good is hard then we are confused.

Figure out why here:

http://www.roage.com

It is easier then you think

Roage

by Roage (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 53 comments) on Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 4:04:09 PM
 


just a concerned citizen.
k kellyjust a concerned citizen.

i was with you until...

"...nations who are led by sociopaths or antisocial, anti-human ideologies, we must always remember Abraham Lincoln's admonition to Generals Sherman and Grant, about the post-Civil War American South: “Let them up easy.”  Because in the end, no matter how morally wrong their ideologies and actions, the people who constitute an enemy nation are still human beings. "

congratz, you did get this sentiment correct in that these three examples, were the epitome of  the sociopath.  

but, you need to do more research, most people do inre this issue from our not so distant past.  until quite recently history was written by the winners, who control what the ensuing generations are taught.  

i have an archival source link, it's author, an economics professor,  a northerner, takes quite a different tack on events pre/post dating the civil war.  if you truly wish to "choose the hardest thing", and reeducate yourself on this issue,  or at least entertain the idea that what up to this point you've been taught or read on the subject, just might be incomplete or even in error....

i submit:

DiLorenzo's archive 

by k kelly (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 182 comments) on Sunday, June 17, 2007 at 9:58:25 AM
 


Richard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden. His fondest desire is to be the one to arrest Bush and Cheney after they leave office in 2009.
noneRichard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden. His fondest desire is to be the one to arrest Bush and Cheney after they leave office in 2009.

be careful who you quote

Thomas DiLorenzo is one of those neo-Confederate intellectuals whose real goal, IMHO, is establishment of an aristocracy.  They have been trashing Lincoln for a decade, forgetting that he had nothing to do with Reconstruction: he was already murdered.  DiLorenzo's anarcho-capitalist libertarian viewpoint is all a smoke screen to establish a hereditary elite.

Richard Girard

by none (15 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 36 comments) on Monday, June 18, 2007 at 12:21:03 PM
 


just a concerned citizen.
k kellyjust a concerned citizen.

hereditary elite?

"DiLorenzo's anarcho-capitalist libertarian viewpoint is all a smoke screen to establish a hereditary elite."

i'd love to know, how you came to this conclusion... and to which family lines do you refer to? Are we talking continuation of existing lines, Rothchild?s? Bush's? unnamed constituency of the Bilderbergs?

although i'd admire some aspects the austrian/mises school of thought, i've never come to your conclusion with respect to anything i've ever read there.

As for other independent sources which corroborate DiLorenzo's infomation, specifically on Lincoln and his connections political/monetary to the ruling hereditary elite of that time read free online, Gustavas Myers "History of Great American Fortunes" includes info on the founding families, canadian dynasties, and also formation and function of the supreme court.

Gustavas Myers online

 

 

by k kelly (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 182 comments) on Monday, June 18, 2007 at 2:06:38 PM
 

 

10 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

"Welcome, Rich White Oligarchs!" --Daily Show Billboard Greets Republicans In Minnesota Posted by Rob Kall

Why I Won't Vote for John McCain by Phillip Butler

Carville is a Spy for Bush Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Virgo New Moon, August 30, 2008 by C.L. Pagano

McCrash: McCain's Military Record Revisited by Hill Kemp

Howard Zinn's Advice to Obama by Rob Kall

Got a Traffic Ticket in the Mail for a Right on Red at an Automated Enforcement Light? by Tumerica

The Rise and Fall of the US Dollar as the The World Reserve by John Little

"Now, This!" by Stephen Pizzo

Torture As Official Israeli Policy by Stephen Lendman

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular