Ann Coulter can't help herself. She's addicted to attention. Bad attention is better than no attention at all. Poor pitiful Ann just can't stand not being noticed. If she's not noticed, then she might as well not exist at all.
Like any narcissist, Ann Coulter has to be the center of attention. A narcissist can only bloom in the limelight. Coulter has no shame when it comes to soliciting fame. Bearing false witness, name calling or good old fashioned prick teasing, Ann is going to get noticed, whatever it takes. Or else there'll be hell to pay. Then again, there's hell to pay when she is noticed. Either way, Coulter knows who bought her soul and that in exchange for getting all the attention she craves that she's to raise as much hell as devilishly possible.
Ann Coulter is so insecure. Sure, she works with all her marketing might to cover up a deep underlying low self-esteem with her abrasive and asinine arrogance. But her disdain thinly veils her pain. Anybody who grovels so low to get attention surely is trying to fill a dark core of despair and spiritual emptiness. And the more she seeks the spotlight, the more she reveals her desperation.
Maybe she's insecure about her looks. I mean, she does rather look like a drag queen who's been under the knife. But the feminine hormones haven't quite kicked in yet. No matter what she tries, she just can't erase that telltale Adam's apple. Perhaps that is why she always has to dress in a slinky cocktail dress and act like she's at a meat market waiting to get pounded so everybody will know she's a real woman.
Then again, maybe Coulter uses her looks because she knows her brains are even skinnier. All that can be said for sure is that when it comes to any intellect she might have, she's not putting out. Better to blowhard.
And, instead of groveling at her pumps, any man who dares question Ann is obviously a girly-boy or a faggot. Like the time the editors at National Reviewquestioned Coulter's writing. Obviously they were girly-boys for questioning Ann.
John Edwards is obviously a "faggot" to Ann Coulter. What else to call a man who doesn't have the same values as Ann?
Such obviously is the reasoning that Coulter used to call Al Gore a "total fag." Coulter also has said that Bill Clinton "show[s] some level of latent homosexuality" because "everyone has always known, widely promiscuous heterosexual men have, as I say, a whiff of the bathhouse about them."
Well, at least Clinton is married. As to the single Ann, who does not appear to have had any significant long term romantic relationship - at least one by the conservative Christian standards she claims - what is to be made of her saying on the Geraldo Rivera show that "Let's say I go out every night, I meet a guy and have sex with him. Good for me. I'm not married."
Let's see. If a man has multiple partners then he's a homosexual, according to Coulter. But if Ann Coulter goes out every night, has sex, and never has a lasting relationship then what does that make her? Why, it makes Ann Coulter a conservative Christian commentator in George Bush's TexAmericana, the home of the chickenhawk politician and the narcissistic commentator.
B. 1952, GA, USA. D. To Be Determined. Beloved husband, father, grandfather, lover, confidant and friend of many from bikers to Zen masters; American writer and speaker, known for his criticism of Mammon's unholy trinity of big business, big (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Ann Coulter has a sceret that explains all behaviors described in this article.
She is actually a nun in a man's body. Think about this. She is deprived in many ways, foremost of which is sex. A female mympho without sex is dangerous. Her mind is no different from a nun - everything is dogma cast in stone. Yet with the inner being of a man she craves male stimulations and satisfaction, which of course only stress her female deprivation even more once delivered. She is a very rare speciment indeed for study in many fields of science.
by
TomK (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 330 comments [22 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, May 2, 2009 at 7:36:57 PM
I am no fan of Annie. Not by a long shot. Though, I must confess, I do read her columns and receive a bit of joy in poking holes in her logic.
Annie has a dual personality. She has her "professional" or perhaps "performance" personality, and I am sure she has her private personality. If she was the way that has been described in her personal life, then she would be widely hated by everyone. The record does show that she did, at last notice, have a boyfriend who was a liberal - a sworn enemy.
Taking people like Annie, Hannity, O'Rantley, Beck, Limpbrain, Olberman, Franken, Daily, Huffman, et al seriously is a big mistake. They are all class A actors, performing on a stage. They get your attention. People either love or hate their performance - and they keep on talking about their performances. It is all about making money. If they could not pander to partisanship, they would all be unemployed. Those that they offend help create their market and appeal for those that are being pandered to. They are profiting from what America has become, and they do all that they can to keep the partisanship alive and working because that is the source of their wealth.
Accept them for what they are. Beck has the only realistic self view of himself: A rodeo clown. That is all that any of them are.
Almost everyone loves a clown.
It ain't easy being me
by
The Old Codger (32 articles, 1 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 285 comments [198 recommended, 3 rejected]) on Sunday, May 3, 2009 at 1:16:09 AM
(0+)
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Contact Author
View Authors' Articles
(1+)
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0) 
