Tags for This Article:

2008 Elections (1992)  Republicans-GOP (1254)  2008 Election Presidential Primary (1029)  2008 Election Presidential (998)  Right Wing (324)  2008 Presidential Debates (241)  Right Wing Mindset Culture (235) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 29, 2007 at 10:22:20

Headlined on 11/29/07:
YouTube Republican Debate – Taking "You" Right Out of the Picture

by Rev. Robert Vinciguerra

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

 
GOP Will Piss On You

In July, the Rev. Rob Times wrote praise for the Democratic YouTube debate. It was an event showcased the integration of the modern day Internet generation and the democratic process that is as old as our nation, allowing for Americans to once again feel a unique sense of participation in their once unique form of government.

Following the Democratic YouTube debate, Republican leaders expressed concern regarding the colorful format of the event. There were even rumblings of a possible cancellation.

 

The first YouTube debate embodied the creativity of Americans who found a new way to express themselves both artistically and politically at the same time. The result was a patchwork of various view expressed in the most imaginative and ingenious ways; a true testament to our diverse and industrious citizenry.

It would appear, however, that the Republican organizers of the second YouTube debate had other thoughts. Reservations that GOP leaders (and candidates) had after the smashingly successful Democratic debate led to the prohibition of inventive and expressively insightful questions that were submitted by users.

Gone were painstakingly developed animations. Gone were questions in song. Gone were insightful short films developed to make a statement about our country to men who may well lead it for the next four years to come.

It’s not as if there was any shortage of creative content, either. All five thousand videos are available for viewing on YouTube.com; many of them are exceptionally well produced.

Debate moderator Anderson Cooper even began the unceremonious event with a list of what audiences around the country won’t be seeing:

Dennis Kucinich may have seen a UFO, but we'll have no little green men here in Florida… We won't be seeing Richard Nixon, or little kids used to make adult points, though, there is one question where kids may make an appearance. And don't worry; we tried to keep out of most of the Abe Lincolns and Ben Franklins, and all the animals, both stuffed...”

Translation: Any and all efforts by the American voters to show how original and resourceful we really are have been stifled by a Republican party that is too afraid of a younger electorate –  the demographic cross section of the country that is the most technologically savvy and the most likely to participate in this, and similar sorts of events.

The types of video questions that did make it to the air were generally generic straightforward videos of people looking directly into a webcam and asking a question.

While the videos chosen for primetime didn’t abolish the spirit of putting ‘we the people’ in the moderator’s chair by being able to ask direct questions of our candidates on national TV, the feeling of the entire event was very 1990’s-ish.

In retrospect, the debate may as well not have been associated with YouTube at all. CNN could’ve simply solicited video tape submissions, ‘man on the street’ questions, and the moderator could have asked questions of the candidates that were submitted by mail; all of which are, and have been, elements in American politics for decades. Unfortunately, this debate was nothing new.  

The decision by Republican leaders to censor submissions leaves them with an air of snobbish aristocracy about them; that their candidates are too high and dignified to respond to such silly sediments from ‘regular’ people.

It also is the embodiment of a Republican Party that still has a lot of its ideology and philosophy set in deep the past. This is yet another example where America has moved forward but conservatives are clinging on to an earlier time that is now antiquated. In stark contrast, the Democratic Party shows its willing to accept change, adapt, and progressive lead on every issue that faces the country.

 

www,revrob.com

Founder of "The Rev. Rob Times," (www.revrob.com) Rev. Robert A. Vinciguerra has been a longtime student of journalism. Currently, he holds a government job where is a technical writer, instructional designer, and an IT trainer. From Phoenix, Arizona.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

Conservative prolife anti-death penalty tree hugger. Believe that less government is good government, government cannot solve anyone's personal problems, the government taking money from one group of people and giving it to another group of people is a crime, and that people should take responsibility for their own lives.
Mad JayhawkConservative prolife anti-death penalty tree hugger. Believe that less government is good government, government cannot solve anyone's personal problems, the government taking money from one group of people and giving it to another group of people is a crime, and that people should take responsibility for their own lives.

Republican Debate

Quite a few of the questions were actually from Clinton and Edwards supporters and staff members and not Republicans or 'ordinary folks'.  The questions were selected by CNN and not the Republicans.

CNN even selected a question from a member of Clinton's staff and then paid his way to FL to ask a followup. Apparently Senator Clinton isn't happy with planting questions in her own events so she has expanded her dirty campaigning to planting questions in other's events.

To criticize Republicans for a debate that they did not control and that did not inlcude many questions on significant issues facing our country is sad.  Your partisan rush to condemn Republicans caused you to overlook or ignore or misrepresent the debate and who was responsible for what. 

This is a ridiculous format for both parties.  I would have vigorously applauded any candidate from either party who did not attend a farce like this or who walked off the stage in disgust.  We put our presidential candidates through living hell to get nominated and then elected and a made-for-TV piece of low-class political theater like this is insane.  In France the presidential election from start to finish is over in something like 3 weeks.  It is very very short compared to our presidential contests.

by Mad Jayhawk (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 232 comments) on Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:20:35 PM
 


A former (for now) local politician and political activist turned business owner. 40, single.
PetercapecodA former (for now) local politician and political activist turned business owner. 40, single.

the problem with this "debate"

This article was more critical of the debate than it was of the Republican Party.  In the last commenter's rush to defend the Party, he overlooked the central argument of the article - that the videography was staler than that shown in the first debate.  I don't think we need to call the parties "responsible" for their respective debate formats to criticize the change in format for the second debate.  There are obviously Republican supporters who enjoy singing and originality in front of cameras, just as there are Democratic ones.  Whoever was responsible for silencing those voices deserves public criticism.

by Petercapecod (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 7 comments) on Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:13:27 PM
 


"I am a patriot in the tradition or Mark Twain who stated that 'a patriot is one who supports his country 100% of the time...and the government when it deserves it." As such I am passionate about protecting the rights of US citizens under the Constitution and a believer in the principle of Eternal Vigilance."
Abraham007"I am a patriot in the tradition or Mark Twain who stated that 'a patriot is one who supports his country 100% of the time...and the government when it deserves it." As such I am passionate about protecting the rights of US citizens under the Constitution and a believer in the principle of Eternal Vigilance."

Decadence on Parade

That was my reaction to the candidates, with the exception of Ron Paul. These guys are so clearly bought---as are the majority of Democratic candidates---by the Corporatocracy, there isn't an ounce of difference among them regarding the agendas they'd follow if elected. Again, the only clear difference is Ron Paul who has a differentiated point of view: he is actually concerned about the shredding of the US Constitution and the growing threat of Fascism in the United States. Any real differences between Democrats and Republicans? They are "two heads of the same hydra" and will eat us alive if we let them.

by Abraham007 (5 articles, 36 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 41 comments) on Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:41:02 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Anne Kilkenny Full Email on Sarah Palin by Rady Ananda

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's Theory Falls Apart by Len Hart

Librarians Against Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

What Sarah Palin Didn't Tell Us by Mary Shaw

Did Sarah Palin REALLY call Barack Obama "Sambo"? by syQodem

Is McCain Campaign Interfering In Alaska Troopergate Investigation of Palin? by Rob Kall

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

It's Sunday - So Where's Sarah? by steve young

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular