Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 8, 2006 at 12:03:41

View Ratings | Rate It

The Real Road to 9/11

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Randolph T. Holhut (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: randyholhut - Writer

The Bush administration, the most tightly disciplined and secretive White House in memory, has worked for the last five years to obscure the true story of the events surrounding the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

With the fifth anniversary of 9/11 coming up, it's worth remembering the extent of how the Bush administration ignored the threat that al-Qaida posed, and how they used 9/11 to lead this nation into a long, costly and bloody war and occupation in Iraq.

When George W. Bush took office in January 2001, the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, a Defense Department-chartered commission headed by former U.S. Senators Gary Hart and Warren Rudman, had just produced a report that concluded that "a direct attack against American citizens on American soil is likely over the next quarter century."


While Congress apparently was taking the Hart-Rudman report seriously, the Bush administration decided to shove it aside and prepare its own response to the issue.

In May 2001, the Bush administration announced that Vice President Dick Cheney would study the problem of domestic terrorism and assign primary responsibility for dealing with it to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Before the Bush administration decided to go its own way, Hart and Rudman had briefed then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and urged them to spend more time dealing with terrorism.

Nothing happened, and the Hart-Rudman commission's report was ignored. Not even The New York Times chose to report on the commission's findings until Sept. 12, 2001, the day after the 9/11 attacks.

As for the Cheney report, it was never completed.

The story the Bush people have stuck to all along is that the threats they received were too vague to be acted upon. But how do you account for these two stories from July 2001?

The G8 annual economic summit - which President Bush attended - was held that month in Genoa, Italy. The summit featured extraordinary security, including ground-to-air missile batteries. According to a report at the time in the The Times of London, "the Italian Defense Ministry ha(d) taken the precaution after a tip by 'a friendly foreign intelligence service' that Islamic suicide bombers might try to attack the summit in a small aircraft or helicopter."

During that same month, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft stopped taking commercial flights. CBS News reported at the time the reason Ashcroft started flying exclusively in private aircraft was because of a "threat assessment" by the FBI.

Here were two instances where threats were received and acted upon. But no one thought to notify other Americans that something might be up?

Another one of those advance warnings was a report in July 2001 from the FBI's Phoenix office that suspects in a terrorist investigation linked to al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden were attending flight school. The New York Times reported that one of the people who saw the report filed by Special Agent Kenneth Williams was John O'Neill, the FBI's leading expert on bin Laden and one of its top counter-terrorism people.

O'Neill apparently took the memo seriously and tried to warn the higher-ups about it. Nothing was done. It was never shared with the CIA or other intelligence agencies; not even the top echelon of the FBI ever saw it. In the midst of this inaction, the Bush administration was supposedly backing off tracking bin Laden because it was more interested in cutting a deal with the Taliban in Afghanistan - which was harboring bin Laden - so a oil pipeline could be built.

O'Neill quit the FBI in disgust in August 2001 to take a job as chief of security at the World Trade Center. The pipeline negotiations broke down later that month. Bin Laden's forces struck on Sept. 11, and O'Neill died at the hands of the people he had fought so hard to thwart.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Randolph T. Holhut has been a journalist in New England for more than 25 years. He edited "The George Seldes Reader" (Barricade Books). He can be reached at randyholhut@yahoo.com.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 
What about the indirect attack? by amazin on Saturday, Sep 9, 2006 at 12:30:33 AM
NSPD 1 by Richard Girard on Saturday, Sep 9, 2006 at 2:22:30 PM
real road to no where by Pat Herrick on Saturday, Sep 9, 2006 at 2:45:11 PM
the real road to no where by Pat Herrick on Saturday, Sep 9, 2006 at 2:53:50 PM
Not to mention (yes, to mention)... by johndoraemi on Saturday, Sep 9, 2006 at 10:59:14 PM
Bushit that Osamanabitch by Dom Jermano on Sunday, Sep 10, 2006 at 4:32:47 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum