Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Does "Faulty Planning" by Pentagon Surprise Anyone?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Does “Faulty Planning” by Army Intelligence Really Surprise Anyone?

The New York Times on February 8, 2008, reporting that the US Army “Buried" a study on faulty Iraq planning, recalled my own brief experience with Army Intelligence in the 1960s.

The recent RAND Corporation report, commissioned by the Army as a vehicle for learning how to plan future operations better, was apparently too rich in learning opportunities for the Army brass, as the RAND report strongly criticized nearly every facet of the Bush war machine. In fact, the Army now wants to put a lid on the report (that our tax dollars purchased) and have RAND rewrite it, with a due date in, say, 2025.

Imagine, also, that the Army actually needed to hire the RAND Corporation to learn these choice morsels of wisdom:

1. President Bush and Condi Rice failed to resolve significant pre-invasion differences among rival agencies;

2. Donald Rumsfeld was inappropriately assigned to oversee postwar Iraq despite the Army’s lack of capacity for civilian reconstruction planning and execution;


3. Former Army General Colin L. Powell’s State Department produced a voluminous study on the future of Iraq that was of “uneven” [read “terrible”] quality and “did not constitute an actionable plan…;”

4. Gen. Tommy Franks, whose Central Command oversaw the military operation in Iraq, had a “fundamental misunderstanding” of what the military needed to secure postwar Iraq;

5. The Pentagon’s military planners assumed that the reconstruction requirements would be minimal;

6. There was never an attempt to develop a single plan that integrated humanitarian assistance, reconstruction, governance, infrastructure development and postwar security;

7. The Bush Administration did not provide strategic policy guidance for postwar Iraq until shortly before major combat operations commenced;

8. That problem was compounded by General Franks, saying he took a narrow view of the military’s responsibilities after Saddam Hussein was ousted and assumed that American civilian agencies would do much to rebuild the country;

9. The Army’s poor planning had the inadvertent effect of strengthening the insurgency.

Could there be even one literate adult, in the United States or abroad, who hasn’t already reached these conclusions after a cursory reading of the “news” stream from ABC, CBS, Fox, CNN, or MSNBC?

Recall, as well, the New York Times story regarding Army Intelligence activities from October 13, 2006:

Internal military [Intelligence] documents released Thursday provide new details about the Defense Department's collection of information on demonstrations nationwide last year by students, Quakers and others opposed to the Iraq war……

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

I am a progressive activist. After 28 years in health care management I left in disgust at the mess that commercial health insurance companies have created. I must work to live (self-employed) and enjoy performing with several classical & jazz (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum