Tags for This Article:

Voting (1406)  2006 Congressional Elections (372) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
October 11, 2007 at 14:12:32

Fewer Than Half of Eligible Minority and Low-Income Americans Voted in 2006, Report Shows

by Project Vote     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Project Vote released a report today, “Representational Bias in the 2006 Electorate,” by Douglass Hess that finds a continuing problem with the U.S. electorate: those who are registered and vote are not representative of the overall U.S. population eligible to vote. The proportion of the U.S. population that registers to vote and that does vote is highly skewed towards Whites, the educated and the wealthy. Furthermore, young eligible Americans, particularly young minority males, and those who have recently moved, are disproportionately represented among those who do not participate in the U.S. electorate.

“This review of the survey data strongly points to the need for civic organizations and government officials (at all levels of government) to continue to expand access to voter registration,” says Hess. “For their part, governments should view bias in the electorate as a call to embrace voter registration as an affirmative responsibility through better implementation of laws relating to the registration of young, low-income and minority voters.”

“Representational Bias in the 2006 Electorate” is the first report to analyze just-released data on the 2006 election by the US Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey (CPS). Consistent with previous years, the report finds that electoral participation – both registration and voting – is stratified by social and economic factors, including age, income, education and race and ethnicity:

- A substantial majority of eligible Americans (52 percent) did not participate in the 2006 general election, either because they were not registered (32 percent) or because they were registered but did not vote (20 percent). Of those registered, however, the majority (71 percent) did vote.

- Americans between 18 and 29 were approximately 20 percent of the eligible voter population but only 10 percent of the voting population in 2006.

- In registration, non-Hispanic Blacks lagged behind non-Hispanic Whites by 10 percentage points: 61 percent to 71 percent. Only 54 percent of Latinos and 49 percent of eligible Asian-Americans report being registered.

- In voting, non-Hispanic Blacks also lagged behind non-Hispanic Whites by 10 percentage points: 41 percent to 52 percent. Approximately 32 percent of eligible Latino and Asian-American citizens voted.

- If all eligible minorities had voted at the rate of non-Hispanic Whites, more than 7.5 million additional Americans would have participated in the 2006 elections.

“The electorate does not reflect America’s voting eligible population,” says Project Vote Deputy Director Michael Slater. “Parties, candidates and organizations need to speak to the interests and values of all Americans not just White Americans or affluent Americans. Until they do, and until existing legal and administrative barriers are lowered, we will continue to see an electorate that is stratified by race, income and age.”

Project Vote calls on civic organizations and officials at all levels of government and throughout the political process to expand opportunities for participation in U.S. elections. Specifically, Project Vote continues to press officials to ensure that the Voting Rights Act, National Voter Registration Act and Help America Vote Act are implemented fully and fairly to reduce the bias that is so evident from this report.

For a copy of the report, please visit www.ProjectVote.org

 

www.projectvote.org

Project Vote is the leading technical assistance and direct service provider to the civic participation community. Since its founding in 1982, Project Vote has provided professional training, management, evaluation and technical services on a broad continuum of key issues related to voter engagement and participation in low-income and minority communities.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

I'm an anti-civilizationist and election boycott advocate in San Diego. For reasons not to vote in faith-based elections with secret vote counts for candidates you cannot hold accountable if they fail to represent you, check out the discussions, articles, and videos on my website http://noinnovember.ning.com
Mark E. SmithI'm an anti-civilizationist and election boycott advocate in San Diego. For reasons not to vote in faith-based elections with secret vote counts for candidates you cannot hold accountable if they fail to represent you, check out the discussions, articles, and videos on my website http://noinnovember.ning.com

Remember what Jim Hightower said?

"If God had wanted us to vote, She'd have given us candidates."

Where, pray tell, is the low-income candidate on the ballot who would represent the majority of the U.S. people who happen to be low income?

Is it our fault that we don't think that any of the millionaires and billionaires we are allowed to select among in elections, would represent our interests?

Abolish the electoral college, get rid of partisan redistricting, allow proportional representation, enact instant run-off voting, get rid of the black box voting machines, restore the Fairness Doctrine to the media, bar corporations from taking any part in politics, move elections to weekends instead of workdays, and have publicly-funded elections, and we might think about registering and voting.

It takes a lot of money to run a successful campaign for office these days. Those of us who are low income, that is, the majority of Americans, cannot afford to run for office. Why should we participate in elections in which we are unable to run?

Do you think that we want taxation without representation? Do you think that we don't know that when the rich are in power they will give tax breaks only to the rich?

We're not apathetic and we're not stupid. If American Idol only gave us a choice among contestants who couldn't sing or dance, we wouldn't vote there either.  

by Mark E. Smith (21 articles, 30 quicklinks, 100 diaries, 1325 comments) on Friday, October 12, 2007 at 10:00:55 PM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

BARACK OBAMA On Gandhi's Birthday by Stephen Fox

Naomi Wolf Must Watch Video: A Coup Took Place on October 1, 2008 by youtube

PECK, PECK. . .SQUAWK! by Rip Rense

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

Sarah Palin; Secessionist-- powerful new Youtube Video by youtube

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

A Solution? by Paul Craig Roberts

Sarah Palin Broke The Ethics Law In Alaska, And Can Be Impeached by Rev. Bill McGinnis

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

Go To Top 50 Most Popular