Tags for This Article:

People (2547)  Race (465)  Conflict (164) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
March 22, 2008 at 09:54:14

Deeper into Racism

by Peter Michaelson     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Barack Obama’s great speech on racism this week could have gone deeper into the American psyche. But he did begin to plumb the further reaches of this social dysfunction that continues to plague us.

 

Obama’s speech examined America’s continuing struggle to rise above racial hostility. He denounced racial bitterness and encouraged us to move forward in harmony. He also tried to help us understand the anger from the past that his pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, has expressed in his sermons.

 

If we go deeper into the source of racism, we can make faster progress in alleviating it. Racism is a form of self-defeat and national sabotage, and it is caused by unresolved conflicts and negative emotions in the human psyche. In one respect, a racist is a person who is desperate to feel superior to others in order to cover up his emotional entanglement in the conviction of his own inferiority. That conviction of inferiority is an aspect of the racist’s dark side that typically he or she declines to understand or even to acknowledge.

 

This kind of an entanglement in the dark side has many variations. The power-hungry politician compulsively seeks the emotional validation that comes from feeling powerful because he or she feels unworthy or insignificant without it. In the same way, a greedy businessman can seek wealth in order to feel superior to others, just as a person who pursues sexual conquest does so for a surge of personal validation.

 

In the same vein, a person who can’t stomach the idea of a black man or a woman as president is someone who, because of inner entanglement in the dark side, would feel personally reduced by the experience. Similarly, a pseudo-patriot is a person who feels compelled to identify with the greatness of his nation in order to compensate for how small or insignificant he feels without this emotional connection.

 

Politicians can’t speak to us so frankly about our human failings because too many of us would be offended and reject their words with defensive hostility. (People disliked it when Jimmy Carter, in a much less threatening way, tried to tell us what was good for us.) However, Obama alluded to the dark side when in his speech he shined a light, as Maureen Dowd put it in The New York Times, “on that clannish place where grudges and grievances flourish.”

 

Racism is a negative, primitive way to bolster one’s self-image. As a psychological cover-up, it doesn’t work as well as it did in the Jim Crow era because the racist no longer has widespread social acceptance for his form of dysfunctional acting out. Racism has now become more subtle.

 

People hide their racism even from themselves. For instance, many people will vote against Obama for racist reasons, while doing so in “good conscience” because they have deluded themselves into believing in the objectivity of the political attacks against him. This is why Obama is particularly vulnerable to negative campaigning. It explains, for instance, why so many are willing to go on believing that Obama is a Muslim.

 

Disqualifying a candidate on the basis of race or gender is a symptom of our dark side. Even though this negativity or dark side can be unconscious, we are ultimately responsible for it if we want to consider ourselves full-fledged human beings. When we acknowledge our dark side through honest or humble contemplation, we can put it aside, thereby enabling us to perceive the political candidates more objectively and to act in the spirit of what’s good for America.

 

These impulses that radiate from our dark side are just as strong as our sex drive and just as able to screw up our lives. To sense the power of these impulses, read The March of Folly, a history of national self-defeat by Pulitzer-Prize winning author Barbara Tuchman. More awareness of our dark side would help us to avoid acting out the ultimate self-defeat of denying global warming.

The dark side is a kind of inner tyranny and we need to rebel against it. The greatest freedom is freedom from our dark side.

 

Peter Michaelson is an author and psychotherapist with a private practice in Ann Arbor, MI. He offers telephone sessions and specializes in marriage and partnership conflict resolution. His blog, books, and PDF files (of his books)are available at www.QuestForSelf.com.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Having lived six decades now, I've had a lot of experiences! Grew up in a family often oppressed because of our faith - we stood for peace and against war, and for the rights of all regardless of ethnic background. Active from youth in peace and civil rights. Vietnam-era draft resister. Worked for a while for peace and social justice groups, and then became a civil servant. Felt a call to a consistent life ethic, and am currently serving as President of Consistent Life. All this is out of Chr...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Bill SamuelHaving lived six decades now, I've had a lot of experiences! Grew up in a family often oppressed because of our faith - we stood for peace and against war, and for the rights of all regardless of ethnic background. Active from youth in peace and civil rights. Vietnam-era draft resister. Worked for a while for peace and social justice groups, and then became a civil servant. Felt a call to a consistent life ethic, and am currently serving as President of Consistent Life. All this is out of Chr...

to see more of bio, click on member name

The Problem and Obama's Response

Obama tried to thread a middle ground in his speech.  While acknowledging some continuing effects of racism, he specifically denounced Wright for calling racism endemic in America.  If the continuing effects of racism are profound in America, which Obama appeared to acknowledge, than Wright is correct in calling racism endemic.

Obama clearly felt politically that he had to denounce the statements by Wright that seemed inflammatory to many white Americans.  And the course he took of trying to explain some of what Wright was pointing out in language that might be easier for some to hear, while denouncing prophetic statements of truth by Wright, could well be the best one in terms of Obama's political future.

However, one wonders if Obama's blunting of the truth by the strength of his denunciation of prophetic remarks by Wright won't actually feed the misimpression by probably a large majority of white Americans that any lingering effects of racism are very minor and don't need much attention.  Obama emphasized, in contrasting his position with Wright's, progress that has been made.  While he is correct that there has been progress, whites who want to believe that so much progress has been made that blacks should stop talking about and seeking action on all the institutional racism that remains will feel they have been vindicated by the most prominent African-American in politics today.

I realize the difficult position Obama was in.  If he didn't denounce some of the most controversial remarks by Wright, it very well might have doomed his Presidential effort - and race would have once again been conclusive politically and McCain would not have had to said a word for that to happen.  But did he go too far, and thereby put barriers in the way of further progress?  I don't think Wright's statement that racism is endemic was one of the more inflammatory remarks.  It doesn't carry the emotions of some of the other remarks.  I think Obama could have done what he needed to in the speech without specifically denouncing the idea that racism was endemic in America. 

by Bill Samuel (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 277 comments) on Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 8:34:12 PM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

Many more people will vote for Obama because of racism.

Why is it always reported and confirmed that the "blacks" will vote for Obama? Is this racist?

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 608 comments) on Monday, March 24, 2008 at 2:15:56 AM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

The Mailer That Put the Final Nail in the McCain Campaign Coffin by Rob Kall

On Naomi Wolf's Sounding the Alarm by Dr. Dennis Loo

Race in the 2008 Election by Sally Liuzzo-Prado

FEMA Official States Bush Is Planning To Implement Martial Law by William Cormier

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

Sarah Palin; Secessionist-- powerful new Youtube Video by youtube

Capitalism Condemned in Scriptures; Let's Dump It by Jay Janson

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

Sarah Palin Broke The Ethics Law In Alaska, And Can Be Impeached by Rev. Bill McGinnis

Cindy McCain Blames Vets for PTSD by Stuart Steinberg

Go To Top 50 Most Popular