Tags for This Article:

Integrity (350)  Activism (326)  Courage (307)  Activism (201)  Wisdom (118)  Psychology (104) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
October 18, 2007 at 00:06:51

What Can I Do?

by Peter Michaelson     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Across the country, gatherings of alarmed citizens are discussing our descent into tyranny. At these meetings a frequent question is asked, often presented in mournful desperation: What can I do?

 

Many of the individuals who ask this question are not really interested in a concrete here’s-what-to-do answer. They are stuck emotionally in a passive spot in their psyche. Their question is a cover-up of their unconscious collusion in their painful passivity. (Each of us can find plenty to do to help our country. Start with MoveOn.org’s 50 Ways to Love Your Country, and add to that list a thousand everyday ways that, while exercising our integrity and courage, we manifest our vision of America.)

 

The question (What can I do?) is superficial. Here are deeper, more helpful questions: Why am I doing nothing when I understand the gravity of our plight? Do I feel I have nothing worthwhile to offer? Am I secretly afraid to emerge from this sense of helplessness?

 

Bear with me for a few minutes to consider some in-depth psychology. And please forgive me for being pedantic. Normally, I write in a lighter vein. This deep in the psyche, though, my serious side takes over.

 

Two primary forms of energy or emotional processing are at play in our psyche—aggression and passivity. They are like two formats—or two different but related software programs—through which we individually experience ourselves and life. Usually, though, they are in conflict and produce much mental and emotional suffering.

 

An individual can become emotionally fixated with aggression and control and then identify strongly with those attributes, while another individual is more familiar with feelings of submission and powerlessness at the opposite pole in the psyche. Because aggression and passivity cover so much ground in our psyche, they inhibit the development of our own autonomous self, which provides us with inner peace, wisdom, resolve, and a sense of meaning.

 

Politically aware individuals who are passive are in a painful predicament. They subject themselves to inner criticism for their inertia, while they sink into feelings of hopelessness. Although their inaction is the result of an emotional block, they can feel it is due to some fundamental deficiency at the core of their being. Feelings of being unworthy and useless are common.

 

Typically, passive individuals feel completely stymied in shaping their own lives and forging a personal destiny. They can feel even more overwhelmed at the idea of contributing to a national undertaking of citizenship assertiveness, although they know their participation is vital.

 

A politically aware individual who operates in the world outside the sticky web of passivity does not ask mournfully, “What can I do?” This person is already doing something effective. This individual finds personal satisfaction, even pleasure, in the expression of his of her power and creativity in the great cause of democracy’s salvation.

 

Those who feel paralyzed or immobilized can quickly extricate themselves from that predicament. They begin to examine their emotional block and to understand that all of us are going to stumble over whatever is unresolved within. They can practice inner vigilance, whereby they consistently detect those thoughts and beliefs that reveal their underlying passivity. Our intelligence and good intentions rectify the weakness once the unconscious configuration is exposed.

 

On a related issue, some progressive activists become frustrated because they’re convinced they’re not effective. Or they may be discouraged or frightened by intimidation and harassment (i.e. being put on a no-fly list or an FBI list.) This week two letter writers to the New York Times, in reply to Frank Rich’s column, “The ‘Good Germans’ Among Us,” said their activism since 2003 has been of little avail. One writer signed off, “I am profoundly discouraged. What can we do?” The other ended her letter this way: “We have been betrayed by our government, ignored by our representatives and failed by our press. Please tell me, Mr. Rich, what would you have us do now?”

 

Chronic feelings of defeat at this point in our struggle are also primarily due to unresolved passivity. Any spirited activist will tell us, “If we don’t give up, we won’t be defeated. We will prevail.” We are in a dramatic showdown comparable to the civil-rights struggle, which for more than a decade in the mid-20th century was intense and exhausting.

 

Every petition we sign, letter we write, Congressional representative we contact, person we inform, and demonstration we march in undermines the liars, thieves, hypocrites, and murderers. This love for our country is all that stands between us and outright tyranny. The stronger we are emotionally, the more we practice some detachment, take delight in our fortitude, and move forward relishing the well-deserved satisfaction of our gallantry.

 

Peter Michaelson is an author and psychotherapist with a private practice in Ann Arbor, MI. He offers telephone sessions and specializes in marriage and partnership conflict resolution. His blog, books, and PDF files (of his books)are available at www.QuestForSelf.com.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

* * * * *

Tim Riley is a father, husband, technical writer, and internet news hound avidly interested in progressive politics, environmentalism, social justice, and playing with his two children.

Tim Riley* * * * *

Tim Riley is a father, husband, technical writer, and internet news hound avidly interested in progressive politics, environmentalism, social justice, and playing with his two children.

Too deep. The question is often practical not superficial.

The question, What can I do?, is often just practical and not so deep. Thankfully the author doesn't leave us without a practical reference:

Each of us can find plenty to do to help our country. Start with MoveOn.org’s 50 Ways to Love Your Country, and add to that list a thousand everyday ways that, while exercising our integrity and courage, we manifest our vision of America.

Well, let's get more practical to get over the obstacles to action. You don't need a thousand ways to act, just pick one or a few to start. :-)  Some wonderfully ambitious person named Anitra Freeman posted 93 Things she wants to do: http://www.listsofbests.com/list/22847  She adds 43 things to do, to the first fifty of her list gleaned from: MoveOn.org's "50+ Ways to Love Your Country".  Don't get overwhelmed by our massive problems and the unlimited number of potential actions that we may take to respond to those situations of urgent need.  Everything counts  The 43Things.com project is ambitious, 50+ Ways to Love Your Country is great, and a list of thousand everyday ways to exercise integrity is completely daunting.  Get inspired by the lists and just pick a couple.  If you can't personally divert the course of the global juggernaut and shift macroeconomic market forces by yourself, well take heart... all change starts from within.  Be more peace full and practice unusual acts of kindness.  Expand your own sphere of influence and make progressive and proactive changes more personal.

Peter Michaelson later offers us:

Every petition we sign, letter we write, Congressional representative we contact, person we inform, and demonstration we march in undermines the liars, thieves, hypocrites, and murderers.

Amen. The social force of our collective efforts can be seen in the polls. The Bush regime and anyone willing to read the polls already knows that the war is massively opposed by a super-majority. Unfortunately either they don't care what the majority thinks or they don't believe we have the power to do anything about it. They have the corporate media minders filtering the truth, broadcasting disinformation and skewed framing.  Well bad news for the corporate mouthpieces: A super majority is already awake and aware of the spin and many of the lies.  Their credibility is stretched so thinly that many people don't even pay them attention any more. 

Yeah, so what else can you do?

Let's stop the Next War.
     
As the MSM will filter and actively suppress pro-peace points of view, we must use the most efficient, persuasive, and creative means possible to stop the neo-cons who would use our national resources for violent and illegal wars of aggression.

Older methods such as protests, marches, and vigils must be employed to engage and encourage those willing to accept information yelled en masse or quietly prayed, but it should be understood that preaching to the choir doesn't convince those on the outside.  I think that even massive protests fail to win many converts. They do show those paying attention that a plurality exists, but unfortunately the media begrudgingly gives the most shallow coverage and anybody on the outside of the movement gets none of the emotive persuasion, just some filtered noise, and maybe a single soundbite. Protests, marches, and vigils are very important to rally support and to distribute information to those already predisposed to seeking the truth and going out of their way to listen with an open mind, but we all know that the masses must be reached otherwise.    

What can I do?  I personally like talking with friends, family and associates.  They challenge me to actively listen and engage with patience, love, and hopefully insight.   I try to give voice to ideas that can protect us from justifications for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

Innoculate your friends, family, and associates with mental images that counter justifications for another failed pre-emptive war.  Use the model of innoculation to help people resist the suggestion that war and violent responses are the answer to any problem.


I like to work ideas like the following into conversations about war.  (Apologies for the length and lack of organization.)

Bombing campaigns are inherently immoral because they kill indiscriminately.

Collateral damage is innocent people getting blown to bloody bits for no good reason.  Why are we in Iraq again?
America is threatening attack in the Middle East and some countries threaten to defend themselves.  Isn't that natural?  Why are we occupying Iraq and setting up a puppet government next door to Iran?  OIL and projection of power by intimidation and threat.

Nothing can justify pre-emptive war and bombing from 20000 feet in the sky.  It should be a war crime to kill people indiscriminately and so sloppily.   

Beware of another false flag attack to kick start Americans into revenge mode again. They did it to get us to attack Iraq and now they want to do it to us again to get Iran.

Those neo-cons in the White House are trying to manufacture popular consent to attack Iran. They are beating the drums of war and creating tensions by making inflammatory statements saying that all military options are on the table, and calling all moslems - Islamo-fascists. TV pundits on Fox and other stations don't give other cultures due respect and engage in relgious intolerance that borders on suggesting pre-emptive homicidal genocide. 

Anyone who suggests using a nuclear warhead for anything other than a defensive retaliation should be prosecuted and tried for verbally advocating war crimes and crimes against humanity.  I pity the poor fools listening to hate radio justifying war crimes.

A Christian nation would be trying to make friends with the world and not trying to threaten and bomb them to Hell.  Jesus wouldn't do that.

The Bush Administration always says one thing and then does another.  They say they want to try diplomacy with Iran, when they are actually creating roadblocks to talks by setting unrealistic preconditions that prevent any talks from even starting.  Iran has a right under international treaty to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes and we won't even talk to them officially until they give up that right.

A war on Iran would be another war for Oil, the real reason we went to war with Iraq was to prevent the creation of a oil trading bourse denominated in Euros, and now that Iran wants to set up that exact same kind of trading bourse, the Bush Administration makes deep rumblings threatening to attack Iran when the IAEA declares their nuclear program peaceful and manageable by international regulation and inspections.

Isn't it time America, take care of America's business here at home?  We can buy oil on the world market, we shouldn't have to subsidize the oil industry by killing people on the other side of the planet.

How can we morally justify bombing people in another country without being accessories to murder?  What would Jesus do and who would Jesus bomb? 

America has become just a tool for an amoral corporate empire.

I think the neo-cons have Nancy Pelosi and other key members of Congress under threats of massive, violent retaliation if real action like impeachment is placed back on the table, but that is another article for another time.

by Tim Riley (7 articles, 5 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 130 comments) on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 7:27:49 AM
 


Sandy Sand began her writing career while raising three children and doing public relations work for Women's American ORT (Organization for Rehabilitation through Training). That led to a job as a reporter for the San Fernando Valley Chronicle, a weekly publication in Canoga Park, California. In conjunction with the Chronicle, she broadcast a tri-weekly, 10-minute newscast for KGOE AM. Following the closure of the Chronicle, Sand became the editor of the Tolucan Times and Canyon Crier newspapers...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Sandy SandSandy Sand began her writing career while raising three children and doing public relations work for Women's American ORT (Organization for Rehabilitation through Training). That led to a job as a reporter for the San Fernando Valley Chronicle, a weekly publication in Canoga Park, California. In conjunction with the Chronicle, she broadcast a tri-weekly, 10-minute newscast for KGOE AM. Following the closure of the Chronicle, Sand became the editor of the Tolucan Times and Canyon Crier newspapers...

to see more of bio, click on member name

One Man Has An Answer

Here is an excerpt ffrom a comment I got on my post on 10/15:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_sandy_sa_071015_playing_fast__26_loose.htm

I see only one hope and I don't know why it hasn't been tried. It would seem to me that if all the so-called progressive sites co-ordinated a massive General Strike in the fashion of following Gandhi's efforts against the imperialism of England "we the people" might then be heard.

I've emailed near all the sites and asked why they don't do this and all I get in response is requests for money.

The powers ignore our protests, phone calls, letters and emails. But if we could get just 10% of the populace to stay home from work, school and not buy anything for just one day you better believe the effect this would have would get their attention. If it grew to 50% we'd get our country back tomorrow.  

This I would donate to even tough I've been unemployed since Katrina. (You might say I'm on my one-man personal General Strike)

by Com_n_Sense (0 articles, 321 comments) on Monday, October 15, 2007 at 2:18:59 PM 

Unfortunately, I had to tell Mr. M that I didn't think such an effort would ever fly.  But, who knows?  If enough people get fed up and frustrated enough, and somebody with enough clout gets something like this started, maybe it would work.

In light of Bush actually saying "W.W. III" -- which he's well on his way to starting, if he hasn't already -- out loud to other than Laura or Barney, maybe that time is here and now.

We've reach the point where anything is worth a try.
 

by Sandy Sand (143 articles, 0 quicklinks, 195 diaries, 1376 comments) on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 10:46:56 AM
 


Voluntarily retired California county elected official.
Shirley BianchiVoluntarily retired California county elected official.

What I Can Do

An excellent article. 

I live way out in the boonies, am at an age where marching in protests is becoming a tad difficult, and really hate what is going on.  But...I do have this computer, and the internet.  So...I write Letters to the Editor, write Viewpoints, and talk about this Administration to whomever will listen.

I've been a tad frustrated, of course, but yesterday I had a conversation with a friend who is a confirmed Republican.  She wanted my opinion on whether this Administration was involved in or knew about 9/11.  We talked for about 45 minutes, and her final comment was that she wouldn't know anything about what was going on if she didn't have a friend who actually kept up on things.

My point is, if this 80 year old, confirmed Republican whose family only watches Fox News is getting a clue, there is hope for the country after all.  As the old 1960's comment says, "Do what you can, where you are, with what you have."  Or "Bloom where you are planted."

 

 

 

by Shirley Bianchi (10 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 95 comments) on Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 12:36:39 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

BARACK OBAMA On Gandhi's Birthday by Stephen Fox

Naomi Wolf Must Watch Video: A Coup Took Place on October 1, 2008 by youtube

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

PECK, PECK. . .SQUAWK! by Rip Rense

Sarah Palin; Secessionist-- powerful new Youtube Video by youtube

A Solution? by Paul Craig Roberts

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

Sarah Palin Broke The Ethics Law In Alaska, And Can Be Impeached by Rev. Bill McGinnis

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

Go To Top 50 Most Popular