Tags for This Article:

USA United States Of America (7159)  Democracy (1727)  Propaganda (1063)  Presidential Campaign (501)  Culture (464)  Presidential Campaign Democratic (406)  Presidential Campaign Democratic (296)  Presidential Campaign Republican (244)  Foreign Diplomacy (176)  Presidential Campaign Republican (160)  Mental Health-Therapy (153)  Political Opportunism GOP (132)  Giuliani Rudy (125)  Psychology Emotional Intelligence (106)  Psychology Emotional Intelligence (104)  Domestic Policy (60) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
May 3, 2007 at 06:53:09

A Democratic Deterrent against the Politics of Fear

by Peter Michaelson     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

Rudy Giuliani has unveiled his presidential campaign strategy: He will pursue the Republican Party’s goal of encouraging Americans to be fearful, thereby weakening the country.

Giuliani didn’t reveal his strategy in such forthright terms. Nonetheless, he practically paraphrased Gordon Gekko’s famous saying, “Greed is good,” from the 1987 movie “Wall Street.” In Giuliani’s worldview, fear is good if it keeps a Democrat from becoming president. A Democratic president, the front-running Republican said last week, would “wave the white flag” in Iraq, put us back on defense, and cause greater loss of life.

The Democrats are prepared for this line of attack. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) quickly retorted that Giuliani had taken the politics of fear to a new low. However, Democrats can say a lot more to the American people about why this Republican line of attack is a verbal assault upon us all.

When fear is used as a political tool, the generated fear isn’t directed solely at terrorists or political opponents. It spreads indiscriminately into the nation’s social fabric. Before terrorism, Republicans used both fear of communism and of crime as their tickets to power. Handguns, security systems, guards, gated communities, surveillance cameras, and domestic spying all proliferated. The support of fearful citizens enabled Pentagon budgets to increase, facilitated our production of weapons of mass destruction, and blasted a gaping hole in our privacy.

To put an end to the politics of fear, we need to understand the nature of irrational fear. Why are we so fearful of being killed by terrorists when dying in a car crash is a thousand times more likely? We haven’t been able to shake off all of the fears that we carry from childhood. These include fear of the dark, monsters, ghosts, bugs, animals, as well as fear of going to sleep, loss of a parent, and abandonment. As adults, we put aside the obviously silly fears, but an emotional residue stays beneath the surface. It consists of a chronic, often repressed anxiety about our vulnerability and the threat of allegedly hostile, menacing individuals or forces.

Why isn’t a national campaign underway to educate people about the roots of irrational fear? We can learn how to distinguish valid fears from irrational fears. We need to understand that catering to our irrational fears make us more fearful. Irrational fear causes us to be compulsive and desperate about security and protection. Irrational fears can become contagious and produce nation-wide emotional reactions that lead to political and military blunders. When fear subsides, we see the world more objectively. We also strengthen and broaden our feeling of freedom.

As adults, we project our inner fears into the environment, and we “see” what we believe are legitimate reasons for having guns or a national security state. In other words, because of our inner fears we’ll see the outer world (domestic and international) as more menacing and hostile than it is or has to be. In foreign affairs, this undermines our belief in the power of diplomacy, which is our integrity, virtue, and deal-making wizardry wrapped in our verbal dexterity. Doubting our diplomatic power undermines the personal and civic virtue upon which our democracy depends. We are less able, for instance, to push back the creeping authoritarianism emanating from corporations, institutions, and government.

Giuliani’s strategy has worked in the past for the Republican Party because irrational fear attaches itself to irrational leaders. A passive, thirty-or-so percent of the population will vote compulsively for authoritarians and mindlessly march to their drum. On their flank are many millions of others who, though still passive, can be positively influenced. They can be persuaded to step out from behind their fear to become more rational and to connect with the spirit of citizenship.

How can this be done? Democrats can raise this issue of irrational fear and show more interest in solutions to the problem. Sympathy and understanding can be expressed for citizens who, well before 9/11, were trying to cope with future shock and predatory economics in this Age of Anxiety. In part, fear is widely felt because the people are getting so little back in the way of recognition and respect (except for empty words) from the political and economic establishment, which is spending far too much on the military. When leaders doubt our value, we more easily slip into the fear of self-doubt.

Only the bravest leaders, not political connivers, can inspire us to move back from the brink. Words can be found to inspire us to create more national unity through trust, civility, tolerance, and respect. It’s time to test the idea that our greatest security and freedom, and perhaps also our greatest happiness, are established through our fearlessness.

 

www.QuestForSelf.com

Peter Michaelson is a psychotherapist and author in Plymouth, MI. He offers telephone sessions and specializes in marriage and partnership conflict resolution. PDF files of his books are available at www.QuestForSelf.com.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments

Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Phony Fear

Thanks Peter,

As you well know, totalitarian governments (and most world religions) use fear mongering and group hatred to control human behavior. The roots of this manipulatory tactic go back as far as human kind.

The average person learns early in life to stop worrying about real threats and dangers, like falling off ladders and getting killed by a drunk driver, and to start worrying about imaginary threats, like immigrants, gays and terrorists. They don’t come to these fallacious conclusions based on information, but rather on fear-mongering coming from the government.

Most people will die prematurely from preventable diseases, but that doesn’t stop them from eating fatty foods or drinking too much alcohol. They think they are in control of those “problems”. But un-known, un-seen “terrorists”? That is a boogeyman that will work people into a frenzy. Karl Rove figured that out a long time ago.

 

by John R Moffett (80 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 601 comments) on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 12:51:49 PM
 


Paul Lehto practiced law in Washington State for 12 years in business law and consumer fraud, including most recently several years in election law, and is now a clean elections advocate. His forthcoming book is tentatively titled DEFENDING DEMOCRACY.  
Paul LehtoPaul Lehto practiced law in Washington State for 12 years in business law and consumer fraud, including most recently several years in election law, and is now a clean elections advocate. His forthcoming book is tentatively titled DEFENDING DEMOCRACY.  

Seems like this country's Founders weren't afraid

Seems like this country's Founders weren't afraid to take on the world's largest military and most formidable power, which controlled their own (then) government.   Thanks to Bush administration actions and inactions, we've lost a major american city and thousands of lives (Katrina aftermath of levee failure and Administration inaction).   


So, what is it that we are supposed to be so darn afraid of, other than the Bush administration itself (and then only if we are made of lesser stuff than our Founders and forebears)???  

 

Too bad we didn't know the political party of the Prez otherwise almost all of us would agree on stuff like this.

by Paul Lehto (26 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 35 comments) on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 3:26:23 PM
 


Paul Lehto practiced law in Washington State for 12 years in business law and consumer fraud, including most recently several years in election law, and is now a clean elections advocate. His forthcoming book is tentatively titled DEFENDING DEMOCRACY.  
Paul LehtoPaul Lehto practiced law in Washington State for 12 years in business law and consumer fraud, including most recently several years in election law, and is now a clean elections advocate. His forthcoming book is tentatively titled DEFENDING DEMOCRACY.  

Seems like this country's Founders weren't afraid

Seems like this country's Founders weren't afraid to take on the world's largest military and most formidable power, which controlled their own (then) government.   Thanks to Bush administration actions and inactions, we've lost a major american city and thousands of lives (Katrina aftermath of levee failure and Administration inaction).   


So, what is it that we are supposed to be so darn afraid of, other than the Bush administration itself (and then only if we are made of lesser stuff than our Founders and forebears)???  

 

Too bad we didn't know the political party of the Prez otherwise almost all of us would agree on stuff like this.

by Paul Lehto (26 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 35 comments) on Thursday, May 3, 2007 at 3:26:54 PM
 

 

3 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Anne Kilkenny Full Email on Sarah Palin by Rady Ananda

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

Librarians Against Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

Is McCain Campaign Interfering In Alaska Troopergate Investigation of Palin? by Rob Kall

Protester who interrupted McCain's speech is an Iraq War Veteran by Mary MacElveen

Live OEN Street Medic Report From Occupied St Paul by Michael Cavlan

Why We're Planning to Prosecute Cheney and Bush by David Swanson

McCain's heroic story isn't the whole story; questions need asking by Don Williams

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular