I commend Congressman Robert Wexler (D-FL) for holding many in this administration's feet to the fire and asking the difficult questions that need to be answered. In particular, he is trying to get to the bottom of HOW the CIA was allowed to ILLEGALLY torture individuals.
The following is a transcript of testimony between Wexler and FBI Director Mueller that took place in a House Judiciary Committee on April 23, 2008. Read it for yourself. Then when you are done reading it, ask yourself if you think that Mr. Mueller answered the congressman's questions adequately????
Robert Wexler: Thank you Mr. Chairman. Mr. Director, in January of 2006, the New York Times reported that the NSA wireless wiretapping program had produced thousands of leads each month that the FBI had to track down, but that no Al-Qaeda networks were discovered. During a July 17, 2007 briefing, FBI deputy director John Pistole indicated that the FBI was not aware of any Al-Qaeda sleeper cells operating in the United States. In August of 2007 Congress passed the Protect America Act, giving the intelligence community greater access to electronic communications coming into and out of the United States. I have two questions in this regard.
RW: Has the FBI found any sleeper cells yet? One…
RW: Two. Has the NSA’s wireless wiretapping programs either before the Protect America Act or after led to the prosecution and conviction of any terrorists in the United States?
Robert Mueller: Well, as to your first question as to whether we have found affiliates or, as you would call them, cells of Al-Qaeda in the United States, yes we have. Again, I cannot get into it in public session, but I would say yes we have. With regard to the relationship of a particular case or individual to the terrorist surveillance program, again that is something that would have to be covered in a closed session.
RW: Alright, Mr. Director. An LA Times article from October, 2007 quotes one senior federal enforcement official as saying quote “the CIA determined they were going to torture people, and we made the decision not to be involved” end quote. The article goes on to say that some FBI officials went to you and that you quote “pulled many of the agents back from playing even a supporting role in the investigations to avoid exposing them to legal jeopardy” end quote.
RW: My question Mr. Director, I congratulate you for pulling the FBI agents back, but why did you not take more substantial steps to stop the interrogation techniques that your own FBI agents were telling you were illegal? Why did you not initiate criminal investigations when your agents told you the CIA and the Department of Defense were engaging in illegal interrogation techniques, and rather than simply pulling your agents out, shouldn’t you have directed them to prevent any illegal interrogations from taking place?
RM: I can go so far sir as to tell you that a protocol in the FBI is not to use coercion in any of our interrogations or our questioning and we have abided by our protocol.
RW: I appreciate that. What is the protocol say when the FBI knows that the CIA is engaging or the Department of Defense is engaging in an illegal technique? What does the protocol say in that circumstance?
RM: We would bring it up to appropriate authorities and determine whether the techniques were legal or illegal.
RW: Did you bring it up to appropriate authorities?
RM: All I can tell you is that we followed our own protocols.
RW: So you can’t tell us whether you brought it; when your own FBI agents came to you and said the CIA is doing something illegal which caused you to say don’t you get involved; you can’t tell us whether you then went to whatever authority?
I agree with everything that has been said so far (now that's really going out on a limb?). My only regret is that when Wexler's 15 seconds was up, the NEXT representative to question Mueller should have continued the same line of questioning.
How else will we ever get any answers if we don't even ask the questions that need answering? It's time that we DEMAND answers, instead of letting the little "do-boys" in this administration get off the hook with their nonanswers that are cloaked in doublespeak. They offer our congressman and women to provide private backroom explanations and justifications for their clandestine illegal actions.
Never mind the idea that providing a candid explanation for what they've done and what they continue to do might present a further threat to national security, the threat is to our national integrity.
Yes, I am sure the reason Mueller danced around Wexler's questions was because he wanted to spare us all the humility of learning the real answers. Keep up the great work in pursuing truth and justice and upholding the ideals and values of our great country, Bob! (You know which one.)
by
Kris Malmquist (9 articles, 0 quicklinks, 18 diaries, 80 comments)
on Friday, April 25, 2008 at 3:35:43 AM
