Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
March 7, 2008 at 12:31:37

View Ratings | Rate It

Senator Obama Should Apologize to the U.S. Senate

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Patricia L Johnson (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Patricia L Johnson - Writer

Senator Obama has repeatedly attempted to put Senator Clinton on the defensive by bringing up her vote on H.J. Res. 114, the Joint Resolution providing President Bush with authorization for the use of Military Force Against Iraq.  In much the same manner as a Monday morning quarterback, Senator Obama has criticized the "yea" vote by Senator Clinton.

The problem with his criticism is there aren't too many people that don't feel we should not have attacked the Republic of Iraq.  Unfortunately, these same individuals were not  behind closed doors when confidential security data was being presented to Senators. 

In retrospect, Senator Obama has even been published as stating had he been privy to the intelligence the Senators were provided,  at the time, he may very well have voted 'yea' on the bill. 

If you recall correctly, this vote was taken in October of 2002, barely a year after the 9/11 attack on U.S. soil.  At the time, Senator Obama was NOT a member of the United States Senate.  How he would've, could've or should've voted on this bill is virtually meaningless because 'outsiders' simply do not have access to confidential intelligence reports prepared for members of the United States Senate.

Was Senator Clinton the only U.S. Senator to favor this bill?  Of course not, the vote on the bill was 77-23 which means a full 77 percent of U.S. Senators, after being exposed to the intelligence supplied by our agencies, felt the bill should  be passed.  In addition to Senator Clinton, the following U.S. Senators voted in favor of the bill and their names are listed at the end of this piece.

President George W. Bush had only been in office for barely over a year when this bill was brought before Congress.  He had not been in office long enough, at that time, for anyone to question motives as this country was still in a state of shock over the attacks of September 11, 2001.

H.J. Res. 114 was introduced into the House by, then Speaker of the House, Dennis J. Hastert on October 2, 2002 and was passed by the House and Senate in record breaking time with PL 107-243 being signed into law by President Bush on October 16, 2002.

In a nine-day  period of time this bill was introduced, went to the House Committee on International Relations, went through amendments, was placed on the House calendar for a vote, went to the Senate, was amended, went to the Senate floor for a vote and passed the Senate on October 11, 2002, without amendment.

Five days later it was signed into law by President Bush.

On October 4, 2002 the CBO released their cost estimate of this bill and their narrative begins with the following statement [emphasis added]:

"H. J. Res 114 would authorize the President to use the armed forces of the United States as he determines necessary and appropriate to defend the United States against the threat posed by Iraq and to enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

By itself, the resolution would not authorize any funding for the use of force, nor would it affect direct spending or receipts. While the resolution is a step toward building consensus for the use of force, it also might improve the chances of a diplomatic settlement without the use of force. The resolution would leave the decision to use force to the discretion of the President." Nevertheless, if the President should use the resolution to initiate a war against Iraq, the budgetary effects would be significant.

It is an absolute disgrace that Senator Obama would criticize Senator Clinton, or any of the 77 Senators that voted to pass this joint resolution.  When you add in the 296 House votes you're talking about a total of 373 members of the United States Congress that voted 'yea' to giving President George W. Bush the authority to use military force, if needed.  They didn't authorize him to attack, they authorized him to use military force if necessary to protect U.S. interests.

President George W. Bush chose to attack Iraq.

To have a Junior Senator criticize actions of other members of Congress, when he wasn't even involved in the discussions, for the sole purpose of benefiting his political aspirations,  is disgraceful and Senator Obama should be ashamed.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Richard E Walrath and Patricia L Johnson are co-owners of the Articles and Answers News and Information sites.  Articles and Answers 2007 and more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Disingenuous Article by Mac McKinney on Friday, Mar 7, 2008 at 1:39:42 PM
Obama on Clinton's war vote by Marilyn Frith on Friday, Mar 7, 2008 at 7:36:28 PM
The senate and the war by Jim Stinson on Friday, Mar 7, 2008 at 2:16:45 PM
Oops by Jim Stinson on Friday, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:37:01 PM
Hillary's Iraq Vote by Ron Burnett on Friday, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:29:11 PM
Somehow WE knew by Charlie L on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:24:32 AM
hindsight, a beautiful thing by Marilyn Frith on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:59:54 AM
Hindsight or Forsight? by PrMaine on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:55:55 AM
No we won't give Hillary a break by ncvoter on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:57:16 PM
That was not my question, folks by Marilyn Frith on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 2:52:12 PM
The U.S. Senators voting yes should apologize to the world by Michael Collins on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:24:18 AM
Hillary's vote no "accident", she is ready to start more war by ncvoter on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:53:29 PM
Most of us wanted UN backing before attacking Iraq. by DCDobbs on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:11:30 PM
If this article was intentional satire, it would be clever. by Richard Mynick on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 2:50:06 PM
Hillary's haunted by her past by Ron Burnett on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:04:47 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum